ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Rectal mucosal advancement flaps (RMAF) and fistula plugs (FP) are techniques used to manage complex anal fistulas. The purpose of this study was to review and compare the results of these methods of repair. METHODS: A retrospective review of all complex anal fistulas treated by either a RMAF or a FP at Auckland City Hospital from 2004 to 2008. Comparisons were made in terms of successful healing rates, time to failure and the use of magnetic resonance imaging. RESULTS: Overall, 70 operations were performed on 55 patients (55.7% male). The mean age was 44.9 years. Twenty-one patients (30%) had had at least one previous unsuccessful repair. Indications for repair included 57 high cryptoglandular anal (81%), 4 Crohn's anal (6%), 7 rectovaginal (10%), 1 rectourethral (1%) and 1 pouch-vaginal fistula (1%). All patients were followed up with a mean of 4.5 months. Forty-eight RMAFs (69% of total) were performed with 16 successful repairs (33%). Twenty-two FPs (31% of total) were performed with 7 successful repairs (32%, P = 0.9). In failed repairs, there was no difference in terms of mean time to failure (RMAF 4.8 months versus FP 4.1 months, P = 0.62). Magnetic resonance imaging was performed in 21 patients (37%) before the repair. The success rate in these patients was 20%. CONCLUSIONS: The results of treatment of complex anal fistulas are disappointing. The choice of operation of either a RMAF or a FP did not alter the poor healing rates of about one third of patients in each group.
Subject(s)
Digestive System Surgical Procedures/methods , Intestinal Mucosa/transplantation , Rectal Fistula/surgery , Surgical Flaps , Tampons, Surgical , Adult , Bioprosthesis , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Length of Stay , Magnetic Resonance Imaging , Male , Middle Aged , Rectal Fistula/diagnosis , Retrospective Studies , Treatment Outcome , Wound HealingABSTRACT
The advantages of endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) are probably related to the avoidance of the three major physiological insults associated with open abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair: laparotomy, aortic cross-clamping and ischemia reperfusion injury. Continuing aneurysm expansion indicates a failure to exclude the AAA from the circulation. We describe our experience with open surgery of post-EVAR sac expansion. A consecutive series of 68 EVAR patients was followed up. Endovascular and minimally invasive procedures were the initial treatment option. Failure of these attempts to curtail AAA sac expansion or type 2 large endoleaks (EL) resulted in opening of the aneurysm sac. The procedure includes positioning of a deflated occlusion balloon proximal to the stent graft (SG). Laparotomy with opening of the eneurysm sac was then performed. The thrombus was removed and backbleeding vessels oversewn. The aneurysm sac was then plicated over the SG. Four patients (5.9%) were diagnosed as having either persistent large type 2 EL or sac enlargement. In all patients the procedure was accomplished successfully. One patient died from acute myocardial infarction perioperatively. Three patients recovered uneventfully and follow-up computed tomography confirmed the absence of endoleak and a disappearance of the AAA. We believe that whenever EVAR fails to exclude the aneurysm from the circulation, open exploration without graft replacement should be considered.
