An 18-month follow-up study after randomized treatment of phimosis in boys with topical steroid versus placebo.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the treatment of phimosis using topical steroid. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This was a follow-up study after a prospective, randomized, double-blind study. A total of 137 boys with phimosis were randomly assigned to either betamethasone treatment or placebo for 4 weeks, with application of the cream twice daily. Non-responders to treatment were offered steroid treatment for a further 4 weeks. All patients were invited to a follow-up examination after 18 months. RESULTS: The mean pre-treatment phimosis grades in the steroid and control groups were 5.08+/-0.66 and 4.97+/-0.70, respectively. At the 4-week follow-up, 49 boys (74%) in the steroid group were cured, compared to only 31 (44%) in the control group. Fourteen boys were circumcised after another 4 weeks of treatment; 43 of the remaining 57 boys (17 in the steroid group; 40 in the control group) had been cured. After a total of 92 boys took part in the 18-month follow-up study: 79 had been cured and 13 had suffered a relapse. Twenty-six patients did not took part in the follow-up investigation. No side-effects were noted. CONCLUSIONS: When treatment is necessary for phimosis, we recommend application of topical steroid as first-line treatment because surgery can then be avoided in 85% of cases. This first randomized, double-blind, follow-up study shows that the treatment effect persists for at least 18 months.

Combined sinus tract endoscopy and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in management of pancreatic necrosis and abscess.

BACKGROUND: We report our experience of sinus tract endoscopy (STE) and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) in the treatment of pancreatic necrosis and abscess. METHODS: Thirteen patients with extensive pancreatic necrosis were firstly managed with either percutaneous drainage (PD group; n = 9) or open necrosectomy (ON group; n = 4). Debridement of necrotic tissue was subsequently performed via the drain tract by STE. ERCP was performed only when there was a suspicious of persistent pancreatic duct disruption or choledocholithiasis. RESULTS: In the PD group, the median number of STE sessions required was 3 (range 2-8). The median hospital and ICU stay were 84 days (range 29-163 days) and 0 day (range 0-64 days), respectively, with an overall success rate of 67%. In the ON group, the median number of STE sessions required was 6.5 (range 1-18). The median hospital and ICU stay were 82 days (range 58-194 days) and 19 days (range 4-24 days), respectively. No mortality or failure was noted in the latter group. ERCP was required in nine of 13 patients. CONCLUSION: Combined ERCP and STE is a useful adjunct in treating pancreatic necrosis or abscess.

Can visual distraction decrease the dose of patient-controlled sedation required during colonoscopy? A prospective randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS: We previously demonstrated that audio distraction using relaxation music could lead to a decrease in the dose of sedative medication required and improve patient satisfaction during colonoscopy. This prospective randomized controlled trial was designed to test the hypotheses that visual distraction may also decrease the requirement for sedatives and that audio and visual distraction may have additive beneficial effects when used in combination. PATIENTS AND METHODS: 165 consecutive patients who underwent elective colonoscopy were randomly allocated into three groups to receive different modes of sedation: group 1 received visual distraction and patient-controlled sedation (PCS); group 2 received audiovisual distraction and PCS; group 3 received PCS alone. A mixture of propofol and alfentanil, delivered by a Graseby 3300 PCA pump, was used for PCS in these groups. Each bolus of PCS delivered 4.8 mg propofol and 12 micro g alfentanil. Measured outcomes included the dose of PCS used, complications, recovery time, pain score, satisfaction score, and willingness to use the same mode of sedation if the procedure were to be repeated. RESULTS: Eight patients were excluded after randomization. The mean+/-SD dose of propofol used in group 2 (0.81 mg/kg +/- 0.49) was significantly less than the dose used in group 1 (1.17 mg/kg +/- 0.81) and that used in group 3 (1.18 mg/kg +/- 0.60) ( P < 0.01, one-way analysis of variance). The mean +/- SD pain score was also lower in group 2 (5.1 +/- 2.5), compared with the pain scores in group 1 (6.2 +/- 2.2) and group 3 (7.0 +/- 2.4) ( P < 0.01, one-way analysis of variance). The mean +/- SD satisfaction score was higher in groups 1 (8.2 +/- 2.4)) and 2 (8.4 +/- 2.4), compared with the score in group 3 (6.1 +/- 2.9) ( P < 0.01, one-way analysis of variance). A majority of patients in groups 1 (73 %) and 2 (85 %) said that they would be willing to use the same mode of sedation again, compared with only 53 % in group 3 ( P < 0.01, chi-squared test). CONCLUSIONS: Visual distraction alone did not decrease the dose of sedative medication required for colonoscopy. When audio distraction was added, both the dose of sedative medication required and the pain score decreased significantly. Both visual and audiovisual distraction might improve patients' acceptance of colonoscopy.

Early clinical outcomes after subfascial endoscopic perforator surgery (SEPS) and saphenous vein surgery in chronic venous insufficiency.

BACKGROUND: Subfascial endoscopic perforator surgery (SEPS) has recently become popular as a minimally invasive way to treat chronic venous insufficiency (CVI) of the lower extremities. We report the early clinical outcomes of SEPS and saphenous vein surgery in a prospective series of Chinese patients who presented with severe CVI. METHODS: All patients referred to our hospital for the management of severe CVI (class IV disease or above) after January 1998 underwent SEPS using an ultrasonic scalpel in conjunction with saphenous vein surgery. All patients were followed up prospectively to assess ulcer healing, ulcer recurrence, and symptoms after SEPS. Clinical outcome was evaluated by the scoring system suggested by the Consensus Committee of the American Venous Forum on Chronic Venous Disease. RESULTS: Over a 24-month period, we performed 36 SEPS on 31 patients. Nineteen lower extremities (53%) had active or healing ulcers. Sapheno-femoral ligation was also performed in 33 limbs (92%). Four limbs (11%) developed superficial wound infection, and two (6%) had saphenous nerve dysesthesia. The mean clinical score and disability score decreased from 8.42 to 3.42 and 1.45 to 0.31 respectively, after a median follow-up of 14 months (range, 6-22) (p < 0.005). Eleven ulcers (58%) healed within 6 weeks after surgery. At 1-year follow-up, ulcer recurrence was found in two legs (11%). CONCLUSION: SEPS is safe and feasible. Early clinical results have shown a promising outcome in patients with severe chronic venous insufficiency.

Effect of topical steroid on non-retractile prepubertal foreskin by a prospective, randomized, double-blind study.

OBJECTIVE: The present study, conducted in Hong Kong, aimed to evaluate the effect of topical steroid in non-retractile prepubertal foreskin by a prospective, randomized, double-blind design. MATERIAL AND METHODS: 137 boys with non-retractile foreskin were randomized to betamethasone (n = 66) or placebo (n = 71 ) for 4 weeks with application of the cream twice daily. Non-responders to treatment were offered steroid treatment for a further 4 weeks. RESULTS: The mean pretreatment grade of the foreskin in the steroid and control groups was 5.08 +/- 0.66 and 4.97 +/- 0.70, respectively. At the 4-week follow-up, 49 of the former (74%) had a retractile foreskin (grade less than or equal to 3, mean 2.38 +/- 1.41). In contrast, only 31 of the control group (44%) had a retractile foreskin (less than or equal to 3, mean 3.55 +/- 1.55) (p < 0.001). Only 14 boys were circumcised because 43 of the remaining 57 boys had a retractile foreskin after 4 weeks of treatment. CONCLUSION: when treatment is necessary, application of topical steroid as a first line of treatment may avoid surgery in almost 90% of cases.