Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
PLoS One ; 15(1): e0227697, 2020.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31971945

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Cutaneous leishmaniasis is a neglected disease known to cause significant morbidity among the poor. We investigated a suspected outbreak to determine the magnitude of cases, characterize the cases and identify risk factors of cutaneous leishmaniasis in Gilgil, a peri-urban settlement in Central Kenya. METHODS: Hospital records for the period 2010-2016 were reviewed and additional cases were identified through active case search. Clinical diagnosis of cutaneous leishmaniasis was made based on presence of ulcerative, nodular or papular skin lesion. The study enrolled 58 cases matched by age and neighbourhood to 116 controls in a case control study. Data was collected using structured questionnaires and simple proportions, means and medians were computed, and logistic regression models were constructed for analysis of individual, indoor and outdoor risk factors. RESULTS: Of the 255 suspected cases of cutaneous leishmaniasis identified, females constituted 56% (142/255) and the median age was 7 years (IQR 7-21). Cases occurred in clusters and up to 43% of cases originated from Gitare (73/255) and Kambi-Turkana (36/255) villages. A continuous transmission pattern was depicted throughout the period under review. Individual risk factors included staying outside the residence in the evening after sunset (OR 4.1, CI 1.2-16.2) and visiting forests (OR 4.56, CI 2.04-10.22). Sharing residence with a case (OR 14.4, CI 3.8-79.3), residing in a thatched house (OR 7.9, CI 1.9-45.7) and cracked walls (OR 2.3, CI 1.0-4.9) were identified among indoor factors while sighting rock hyraxes near residence (OR 5.3, CI 2.2-12.7), residing near a forest (OR 7.8, CI 2.8-26.4) and having a close neighbour with cutaneous leishmaniasis (OR 6.8, CI 2.8-16.0) were identified among outdoor factors. CONCLUSIONS: We identify a large burden of cutaneous leishmaniasis in Gilgil with evidence of individual, indoor and outdoor factors of disease spread. The role of environmental factors and rodents in disease transmission should be investigated further.


Subject(s)
Leishmaniasis, Cutaneous/epidemiology , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Animals , Case-Control Studies , Child , Child, Preschool , Disease Vectors , Female , Housing , Humans , Kenya/epidemiology , Leishmaniasis, Cutaneous/transmission , Logistic Models , Male , Middle Aged , Neglected Diseases/epidemiology , Residence Characteristics , Risk Factors , Urban Population , Young Adult
2.
Pan Afr Med J ; 28(Suppl 1): 12, 2017.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30167037

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: in February 2015, an outbreak of acute watery diarrhea was reported in two sub counties in western Kenya. Vibrio cholerae 01 serotype Ogawa was isolated from 26 cases and from water samples collected from a river mainly used by residents of the two sub-counties for domestic purposes. We carried out an investigation to determine factors associated with the outbreak. METHODS: we conducted a frequency matched case control study in the community. We defined cases as episodes of watery diarrhea (at least three motions in 24 hours) in persons ≥ 2 years who were residents of Rongo or Ndhiwa sub-counties from January 23-February 25, 2015. Cases were systematically recruited from a cholera line list and matched to two controls (persons without diarrhea since January 23, 2015) by age category and residence. A structured questionnaire was administered to evaluate exposures in cases and controls and multivariable logistic regression done to determine independent factors associated with the outbreak. RESULTS: we recruited 52 cases and 104 controls. Females constituted 61% (95/156) of all participants. Overall latrine coverage was 58% (90/156). Latrine coverage was 44% (23/52) for cases and 64% (67/104) for controls. Having no latrine at home (aOR = 10.9; 95% CI: 3.02-39.21), practicing communal hand washing in a basin (aOR = 6.5; 95% CI: 2.30-18.11) and vending of food as an occupation (aOR = 3.4; 95% CI: 1.06-10.74) were independently associated with the outbreak. CONCLUSION: poor latrine coverage and personal hygiene practices were identified as the main drivers of the outbreak. We recommended improved public health education on latrine usage and promotion of hand washing with soap and water in the community.


Subject(s)
Cholera/epidemiology , Diarrhea/epidemiology , Disease Outbreaks , Vibrio cholerae O1/isolation & purification , Adolescent , Adult , Case-Control Studies , Child , Child, Preschool , Diarrhea/microbiology , Female , Hand Disinfection/standards , Humans , Hygiene/standards , Kenya/epidemiology , Logistic Models , Male , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors , Surveys and Questionnaires , Toilet Facilities/standards , Young Adult
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...