Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
J Educ Health Promot ; 12: 112, 2023.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37397124

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Epilepsy is one of the major neuron-damaging neurological disorders. Generalized tonic-clonic seizure (GTCS) is the commonest one. Refractory patterns cannot be controlled by simple monotherapy with antiepileptic drugs (AEDs). Valproic acid (VPA) is one of the widely prescribed AEDs but it may not control many cases up to its maximum tolerable doses. In this study, we have seen the safety and efficacy of clobazam to control seizure in the adult population as an add-on drug over valproate, in cases of valproate uncontrolled seizures. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients on VPA monotherapy but not responding to it were recruited after applying inclusion and exclusion criteria and clobazam was added. There were two follow-ups at the interval of 6 months each. Seizure frequency and quality of life inventory in epilepsy-31 items (QOLIE-31) score were recorded to denote efficacy, and the occurrence of any adverse effect was also noted to elicit safety. RESULTS: Out of 101 patients, 78 were male and 23 were female. The most common age group was 18-30 y. Seizure frequency from 2.99 ± 0.95 decreased significantly on the third visit to 0.25 ± 0.43. QOLIE-31 scores of seizure worry, overall quality, emotional well-being, and cognition improved in the second follow-up. Fatigue, somnolence, and weight gain were the major side effects. CONCLUSION: Clobazam could be a good choice as an add-on in GTCS not controlled with VPA monotherapy. Clobazam definitely reduces seizure frequency and seizure worry and improves cognitive function and overall quality of life.

2.
J Educ Health Promot ; 11: 333, 2022.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36568002

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Diagnostic dilemma arises when patients with clinical suspicion of COVID-19 disease having moderate-to-severe respiratory symptoms yield negative result for COVID-19 in reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). This study evaluated the clinical, laboratory and HRCT thorax findings among RT-PCR-negative COVID-19 suspects with moderate-to-severe disease. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A hospital-based retrospective observational study was conducted between July 2021 to December 2021, among 60 moderate and severe symptomatic COVID-19 suspects admitted in the severe acute respiratory illness (SARI) ward and intensive care unit (ICU), who were negative for COVID-19 in RT-PCR. Data were abstracted from the medical records section of the hospital using a predesigned data abstraction form and presented by descriptive statistics. RESULTS: Mean age of study participants was 55.5 years (SD 14.1 years), and majority were males (n = 43, 71.7%). Common presenting symptoms were fever (n = 60, 100%), dyspnea (n = 57, 95%), and cough (n = 54, 90%). The common laboratory findings were rise of C-reactive protein (n = 60, 100%), NLR (n = 49, 81.7%), d-dimer (n = 47, 78.3%), ferritin (n = 46, 76.7%), and LDH (n = 40, 66.7%). HRCT scan of thorax revealed ground glass opacities with or without consolidations located bilaterally with diffuse or peripheral distribution, interlobar septal thickening (n = 43, 74.1%), vascular thickening (n = 35, ≥58.3%), and sub-pleural lines (n = 32, 53.3%). Median CT-SS value was 15 (IQR 11-19), and majority (n = 56, 93.3%) belonged to CO-RADS ≥4. CONCLUSION: Diagnosis of COVID-19 can be presumed in RT-PCR-negative suspected COVID-19 patients with moderate-to-severe disease, with marked rise of inflammatory markers and HRCT revealing typical findings of COVID-19 pneumonia.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...