Cardiovascular event risk assessment in psoriasis patients treated with tumor necrosis factor-α inhibitors versus methotrexate.

BACKGROUND: Psoriasis is associated with increased risk for cardiovascular disease. OBJECTIVE: To compare major cardiovascular event risk in psoriasis patients receiving methotrexate or tumor necrosis factor-α inhibitor (TNFi) and to assess TNFi treatment duration impact on major cardiovascular event risk. METHODS: Adult psoriasis patients with ≥2 TNFi or methotrexate prescriptions in the Truven MarketScan Databases (Q1 2000-Q3 2011) were classified as TNFi or methotrexate users. The index date for each of these drugs was the TNFi initiation date or a randomly selected methotrexate dispensing date, respectively. Cardiovascular event risks and cumulative TNFi effect were analyzed by using multivariate Cox proportional-hazards models. RESULTS: By 12 months, TNFi users (N = 9148) had fewer cardiovascular events than methotrexate users (N = 8581) (Kaplan-Meier rates: 1.45% vs 4.09%: P < .01). TNFi users had overall lower cardiovascular event hazards than methotrexate users (hazard ratio = 0.55; P < .01). Over 24 months' median follow-up, every 6 months of cumulative exposure to TNFis were associated with an 11% cardiovascular event risk reduction (P = .02). LIMITATIONS: Lack of clinical assessment measures. CONCLUSIONS: Psoriasis patients receiving TNFis had a lower major cardiovascular event risk compared to those receiving methotrexate. Cumulative exposure to TNFis was associated with a reduced risk for major cardiovascular events.

Longer durations of antitumour necrosis factor treatment are associated with reduced risk of cardiovascular events in patients with rheumatoid arthritis.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the effects of treatment with antitumour necrosis factor (TNF) agents, methotrexate, or other non-biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) on cardiovascular event risks among patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). METHODS: We conducted a retrospective study using data from the MarketScan claims database. Patients with RA with ≥1 prescription for an index drug were included. Each patient's use of an index drug was calculated cumulatively as a time-varying exposure. The incidence of cardiovascular events among patients with RA was determined. Associations between drug exposures and occurrence of cardiovascular events were assessed with Cox proportional hazards models. RESULTS: Of 113 677 patients identified, 35.8%, 41.1% and 23.1% received anti-TNF agents, methotrexate and other DMARDs, respectively. Patients were treated for an average of 7.6 months; 2138 patients (1.9%) had a cardiovascular event following their index prescription. Each additional 6 months of anti-TNF therapy use versus non-use reduced the risk (HR; 95% CI) for any cardiovascular event by 12% (0.88; 0.81 to 0.95, p=0.002). Anti-TNF therapy was associated with a 13% and 12% reduction in cardiovascular events in patients aged ≥50 years (0.87; 0.80 to 0.95, p=0.002) and in those without prior methotrexate use (0.88; 0.78 to 0.99, p=0.04), respectively. Cumulative use of 1, 2 or 3 years of anti-TNF therapy versus non-use is expected to reduce cardiovascular event risks by 21%, 38% and 51%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Anti-TNF therapy was associated with a significantly lower risk of cardiovascular events among patients with RA, older patients with RA and patients without prior exposure to methotrexate.

Psoriasis patients' willingness to accept side-effect risks for improved treatment efficacy.

BACKGROUND: Previous studies suggest that efficacy is more important than side-effect risks to psoriasis patients. However, those studies did not consider potentially fatal risks of biologic treatments. OBJECTIVE: To quantify the risks patients are willing to accept for improvements in psoriasis symptoms. METHODS: Adults with a self-reported physician diagnosis of psoriasis were recruited through the National Psoriasis Foundation. Using a discrete-choice experiment, patients completed a series of nine choice questions, each including a pair of hypothetical treatments. Treatments were defined by severity of plaques, body surface area (BSA), and 10-year risks of tuberculosis, serious infection and lymphoma. RESULTS: For complete clearance of 25% BSA with mild plaques, respondents (n = 1608) were willing to accept a 20% (95% confidence interval: 9-26%) risk of serious infection, 10% (5-15%) risk of tuberculosis and 2% (1-3%) risk of lymphoma. For complete clearance of 25% BSA with severe plaques, respondents were willing to accept a 54% (48-62%) risk of serious infection, 36% (28-49%) risk of tuberculosis and 8% (7-9%) risk of lymphoma. LIMITATIONS: Respondents were asked to evaluate hypothetical scenarios. Actual treatment choices may differ. CONCLUSION: Respondents were willing to accept risks above likely clinical exposures for improvements in psoriasis symptoms. Individual risk tolerances may vary.

Psoriasis and risk of diabetes-associated microvascular and macrovascular complications.

BACKGROUND: Psoriasis's effect on diabetes onset is well documented, but its effect on course of diabetes is poorly understood. OBJECTIVE: We sought to compare risks of developing microvascular and macrovascular complications between diabetic patients with and without psoriasis. METHODS: Adults with 2 or more diabetes diagnoses selected from MarketScan databases (Truven Health Analytics Inc, Ann Arbor, MI) (2000-2006) were classified into 2 cohorts: 2 or more psoriasis diagnoses and without psoriasis diagnosis. Patients with psoriasis were matched using propensity score, and exactly matched using age, sex, and diabetes characteristics with patients without psoriasis. Outcomes were compared between cohorts using Cox regression models. RESULTS: In all, 6164 diabetic patients with psoriasis (27% moderate to severe) were matched to 6164 diabetic patients without psoriasis. Patients with psoriasis were significantly more likely to develop microvascular events than patients without psoriasis overall (hazard ratio [HR] 1.14, P < .001) and by psoriasis severity (mild: HR 1.13, P = .004; moderate to severe: HR 1.16, P = .038). Risk of macrovascular events was higher for patients without psoriasis overall (HR 1.13, P = .001) and those with mild psoriasis (HR 1.15, P = .003), but not for moderate to severe cases (HR 1.10, P = .210). LIMITATIONS: Psoriasis to diabetes association may be underestimated. CONCLUSION: Among diabetic patients, psoriasis is generally associated with higher rates of microvascular and macrovascular complications. Greater psoriasis severity did not increase risk of diabetic complications.

Nomenclature and traceability debate for biosimilars: small-molecule surrogates lend support for distinguishable nonproprietary names.

INTRODUCTION: The purpose of the present study was to investigate the traceability of adverse events (AEs) for branded and generic drugs with identical nonproprietary names and to consider potential implications for the traceability of AEs for branded and biosimilar biologics. METHODS: Adverse event reports in the Food and Drug Administration AE Reporting System (FAERS) were compared with those in a commercial insurance claims database (Truven Health MarketScan(®)) for 2 drugs (levetiracetam and enoxaparin sodium) with manufacturing or prescribing considerations potentially analogous to those of some biosimilars. Monthly rates of branded- and generic-attributed AEs were estimated pre- and post-generic entry. Post-entry branded-to-generic AE relative rate ratios were calculated. RESULTS: In FAERS, monthly AE rate ratios during the post-generic period showed a pattern in which AE rates for the branded products were greater than for the generic products. Differences in rates of brand- and generic-attributed AEs were statistically significant for both study drugs; the AE rate for the branded products peaked at approximately 10 times that of the generic levetiracetam products and approximately 4 times that of the generic enoxaparin sodium products. In contrast, monthly ratios for the MarketScan data were relatively constant over time. CONCLUSION: Use of the same nonproprietary name for generic and branded products may contribute to poor traceability of AEs reported in the FAERS database due to the significant misattribution of AEs to branded products (when those AEs were in fact associated with patient use of generic products). To ensure accurate and robust safety surveillance and traceability for biosimilar products in the United States, improved product identification mechanisms, such as related but distinguishable nonproprietary names for biosimilars and reference biologics, should be considered.

Increased risk of venous thromboembolic events with corticosteroid vs biologic therapy for inflammatory bowel disease.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: We investigated whether treatment of active inflammatory bowel disease with biologic agents is associated with a reduced risk of venous thromboembolic events (VTEs) compared with corticosteroid therapy. METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of 15,100 adults with inflammatory bowel disease who were identified from the Truven Health MarketScan databases. We analyzed data from patients who received 6 months of continuous medical and prescription coverage before and 12 months after their first diagnosis and had no VTE during the 6 months before they first received biologic or corticosteroid therapy. The outcome assessed was any VTE that occurred during the 12-month follow-up period. A multivariate logistic regression model was used to evaluate the effects of biologic, corticosteroid, and combination therapies (biologics and corticosteroids) on VTE risk. RESULTS: Three hundred twenty-five VTEs occurred during the study period (in 2.25% of patients receiving only corticosteroids, in 0.44% of patients receiving biologics, and in 2.49% of patients receiving combination therapy). Compared with patients receiving only corticosteroids, the odds ratio for VTE in patients receiving only biologics was 0.21 (95% confidence interval, 0.05-0.87) in the multivariate model, and the odds ratio for VTE in patients on combination therapy was 1.01. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with treatment with only a biologic agent, corticosteroid therapy is associated with a nearly 5-fold increase in risk for VTE. Combination therapy with corticosteroids and biologic agents was associated with the same risk for VTE as that of corticosteroids alone. Corticosteroids therefore appear to increase risk for VTE.

Comprehensive disease control (CDC): what does achieving CDC mean for patients with rheumatoid arthritis?

BACKGROUND: This study assessed the impact of simultaneous achievement of clinical, functional and structural efficacy, herein referred to as comprehensive disease control (CDC), on short-term and long-term work-related outcomes, health-related quality of life (HRQoL), pain and fatigue. METHODS: Data were pooled from three randomised trials of adalimumab plus methotrexate for treatment of early-stage or late-stage rheumatoid arthritis (RA). CDC was defined as 28-joint Disease Activity Score using C reactive protein <2.6, Health Assessment Questionnaire <0.5 and change from baseline in modified Total Sharp Score ≤0.5. Changes in scores at weeks 26 and 52 for work-related outcomes, Short Form 36 (SF-36) physical (PCS) and mental component scores (MCS), a Visual Analogue Scale measuring pain (VAS-Pain) and Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue (FACIT-F) were compared between patient groups defined by achievement of CDC at week 26 using linear regression with adjustment for baseline scores. RESULTS: Patients with RA who achieved CDC at week 26 (n=200) had significantly greater improvements in VAS-Pain (46.9 vs 26.9; p<0.0001), FACIT-F (13.3 vs 7.5; p<0.0001), SF-36 PCS (19.7 vs 8.9; p<0.0001) and SF-36 MCS (8.1 vs 5.0; p=0.0004) than those who did not (n=1267). Results were consistent at week 52 and among methotrexate-naive patients with early RA, methotrexate-experienced patients with late-stage RA and patients with inadequate response to methotrexate. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with RA who achieved CDC at week 26 had improved short-term and long-term HRQoL, pain, fatigue and work-related outcomes compared with patients who do not. These results demonstrate that the joint achievement of all CDC components provides meaningful benefits to patients. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBERS: DE019: NCT00195702, PREMIER: NCT00195702, OPTIMA: NCT00195702.

The impact of moderate-to-severe Crohn's Disease on employees' salary growth.

BACKGROUND: Moderate-to-severe Crohn's Disease (CD) has been shown to reduce daily activities; however, little is known of the impact on employees' salary growth. METHODS: Employment and health care benefit data were extracted from the OptumHealth Reporting and Insights database, aggregating data from 23 self-insured U.S. companies with approximately 2.5 million covered beneficiaries. Employees diagnosed with moderate-to-severe CD (i.e., ≥1 prescription fill for systemic corticosteroids, immunosuppressive drugs, methotrexate or cyclosporine, or biologic agents within 6 months after the first observed CD diagnosis) between January 1999 and December 2006 were retrospectively matched with controls without CD based on year of birth, sex, industry, and geographic region. Employees' salaries and salary growth rates were estimated and compared between cohorts. Both descriptive comparison and multivariate regression analyses controlling for baseline characteristics and differences in comorbidities were performed. RESULTS: A total of 918 employees with moderate-to-severe CD were matched to 2154 CD-free controls. The 2 cohorts did not differ in their annual salary in the first year of observation. However, regression analyses revealed that the 2 groups had significantly different adjusted annualized salary growth rates (0.69% versus 1.01%, P < 0.001), and employees with CD had a 31% lower salary increase rate than controls. A total income loss of $3195 per person was estimated for employees with CD compared with their CD-free peers over a cumulative 5 years after the first calendar year. CONCLUSIONS: In the United States, employees with moderate-to-severe CD had a substantially lower salary growth rate than their peers without CD, suggesting an impaired career progression.

Adalimumab therapy is associated with reduced risk of hospitalization in patients with ulcerative colitis.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Adalimumab is effective for induction and maintenance of remission in patients with moderate to severe ulcerative colitis (UC). We assessed whether adalimumab, in addition to standard UC therapy, reduced the risk for hospitalization (from all causes, from complications of UC, or from complications of UC or the drugs used to treat it) and colectomy in patients with moderate to severe UC compared with placebo. METHODS: Data were combined from patients that received induction therapy (a 160-mg dose followed by an 80-mg dose of adalimumab) or placebo in 2 trials (ULTRA 1 and ULTRA 2; n = 963). The risks of hospitalization and colectomy were compared between groups using unadjusted rates during the 8-week induction period, and patient-year-adjusted rates during 52 weeks. Statistical differences between groups were determined using the χ(2) method and Z score normal approximations. Numbers of hospitalizations were compared using Poisson regression with time offset. RESULTS: Significant reductions in risk of all-cause, UC-related, and UC- or drug-related hospitalizations (by 40%, 50%, and 47%, respectively; P < .05 for all comparisons) were observed within the first 8 weeks of adalimumab therapy compared with placebo. Significantly lower incidence rates for all-cause (0.18 vs 0.26; P = .03), UC-related (0.12 vs 0.22; P = .002), and UC- or drug-related (0.14 vs 0.24; P = .005) hospitalizations were observed during 52 weeks of adalimumab therapy compared with placebo. Rates of colectomy did not differ significantly between patients given adalimumab vs placebo. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with moderate to severe UC, the addition of adalimumab to standard of care treatment reduced the number of hospitalizations for any cause, as well as for UC-related and UC- or drug-related complications, compared with placebo. ClinicalTrials.gov numbers, NCT00385736 and NCT00408629.

Adalimumab induces deep remission in patients with Crohn's disease.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Patients with moderate to severe ileocolonic Crohn's disease (CD) who received adalimumab induction and maintenance therapy had greater rates of mucosal healing than patients who received placebo after adalimumab induction therapy in a 52-week trial (EXTend the Safety and Efficacy of Adalimumab Through ENDoscopic Healing). We investigated whether this treatment also induced deep remission-a composite clinical and endoscopic end point. METHODS: Rates of deep remission, defined as the absence of mucosal ulceration and CD Activity Index scores less than 150, were compared between patients given continuous adalimumab and those given only induction therapy followed by placebo. We assessed the relationships between deep remission and other outcomes among patients who received adalimumab. The outcomes of patients with deep remission were compared with those of patients with only the absence of mucosal ulceration or only clinical remission. RESULTS: Rates of deep remission were 16% in patients given adalimumab vs 10% in those given placebo (P = .34) at week 12, and 19% vs 0% (P < .001) at week 52. Rates of deep remission were greatest among patients who received adalimumab and had CD for 2 years or less (33% at weeks 12 and 52). At week 52, patients who achieved deep remission at week 12 required significantly fewer adalimumab treatment adjustments, hospitalizations, and CD-related surgeries; had significantly less activity impairment; and had better quality of life and physical function compared with patients not achieving deep remission. Deep remission generally was associated with better outcomes than only an absence of mucosal ulceration; outcomes of patients with deep remission vs only clinical remission were similar. Deep remission was associated with estimated total cost savings of $10,360 (from weeks 12 through 52) compared with lack of deep remission. CONCLUSIONS: In an exploratory study of patients with moderate to severe ileocolonic CD who received adalimumab induction and maintenance therapy, patients achieving deep remission appeared to have better 1-year outcomes than those not achieving deep remission. These findings should be validated in large, prospective trials. ClinicalTrials.gov number: NCT00348283.

Adalimumab improves patient-reported outcomes and reduces indirect costs in patients with moderate to severe Crohn's disease: results from the CARE trial.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Crohn's disease negatively affects patients' quality of life and ability to work. We investigated the impact of adalimumab on work productivity, daily activities, and quality of life in an open-label trial (N=945). The population comprised both infliximab-naïve and -exposed patients, including infliximab primary non-responders. METHODS: Patients received adalimumab induction therapy (160 mg/80 mg at Weeks 0/2), followed by adalimumab 40 mg every other week for up to 20 weeks (patients with flares/non-response could receive 40 mg weekly at/after Week 12). The Work Productivity and Activity Impairment Questionnaire and Short Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire were assessed. Indirect cost savings were estimated based on the average work productivity improvements at Week 20. RESULTS: Mean baseline scores indicated severe productivity impairment and poor quality of life. At Week 20, 60% of infliximab-naïve and 47% of infliximab primary non-responders achieved clinically important improvements (≥9 points) on the Short Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire, and 51% and 43%, respectively, achieved the minimum clinically important difference (improvement ≥7 percentage points) for total work productivity impairment (non-responder imputation). At Week 20, 64% of infliximab-naïve and 55% of infliximab primary non-responders achieved clinically important improvements in total activity impairment. Estimated 20-week total indirect productivity-related cost savings were €3070 per infliximab-naïve patient and €2059 per infliximab-exposed patient. CONCLUSIONS: Adalimumab therapy significantly improved work productivity and disease-specific quality of life for patients with moderate to severe Crohn's disease. Patients who failed prior infliximab therapy and patients naïve to infliximab benefited from adalimumab, with potentially greater benefits for infliximab-naïve patients (NCT00409617).

Qualitative assessment of the content validity of the Dermatology Life Quality Index in patients with moderate to severe psoriasis.

BACKGROUND: The patient-reported Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) measures the impact of dermatologic diseases on patients' lives. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the content validity of the DLQI in patients with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis. METHODS: In a two-part interview, participants were first asked open-ended questions about the impact of psoriasis-related complaints and symptoms on their lives and activities. The DLQI was then administered and cognitive debriefing interviews assessed participants' understanding of the instructions, items, and response scales, and relevance of the specific items to their experience with psoriasis. RESULTS: Twenty-one patients were interviewed at two US sites. Mean age was 48.8 years, 67% were white, and 43% reported Hispanic/Latino ethnicity. The majority reported living with a partner or spouse (81%) and working full time or part time (57%). Patients' spontaneous responses to open-ended questions were consistent with DLQI concepts and generally did not provide additional concepts. Most participants reported that the instructions, item content, and response scales were clear and easy to understand and relevant. CONCLUSIONS: The content of the DLQI included all important and relevant concepts from the perspective of patients with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis. This study provides further support for the content validity of the DLQI in this population.

Adalimumab for the treatment of moderate to severe Hidradenitis suppurativa: a parallel randomized trial.

BACKGROUND: Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) is a chronic, painful skin disease characterized by abscesses, nodules, and draining fistulas in the axilla and groin of young adults. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of adalimumab, an anti-tumor necrosis factor-α antibody, in patients with moderate to severe HS. DESIGN: Phase 2, parallel, randomized, placebo-controlled trial consisting of a blinded 16-week period (period 1) and an open-label 36-week period (period 2). All study personnel, investigators, and patients remained blinded to treatment group throughout the study. (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT00918255) SETTING: 26 academic and private practice medical centers in the United States and Europe. PATIENTS: 154 adult patients with moderate to severe HS who were unresponsive or intolerant to oral antibiotics. INTERVENTION: Patients were assigned in a 1:1:1 ratio to adalimumab, 40 mg/wk; adalimumab, 40 mg every other week (EOW); or placebo. All patients received adalimumab, 40 mg EOW, at the beginning of period 2 but switched to weekly dosing if the response was suboptimal (HS Physician's Global Assessment [PGA] score of moderate or worse) at weeks 28 or 31. MEASUREMENTS: The primary outcome measure (clinical response) was the proportion of patients achieving an HS-PGA score of clear, minimal, or mild with at least a 2-grade improvement relative to baseline at week 16. RESULTS: At week 16, 3.9% of placebo patients (2 of 51), 9.6% of EOW patients (5 of 52), and 17.6% of weekly patients (9 of 51) achieved clinical response (EOW vs. placebo strata-adjusted difference, 5.6% [95% CI, -4.0% to 15.3%]; P = 0.25; weekly vs. placebo strata-adjusted difference, 13.7% [CI, 1.7% to 25.7%]; P = 0.025). Serious adverse event rates were 3.9%, 5.8%, and 7.8% for placebo, EOW, and weekly patients, respectively (EOW vs. placebo difference, 1.8% [CI, -6.4% to 10.1%]; weekly vs. placebo difference, 3.9% [CI, -5.2% to 13.0%]). Significantly greater improvements in patient-reported outcomes and pain were seen in the weekly dosing group than in the placebo group. A decrease in response was seen after the switch from weekly to EOW dosing in period 2. LIMITATIONS: Weeks 16 to 52 of the study were open-label. The study was not powered to assess the risk for known serious adverse effects of adalimumab, such as tuberculosis, other serious infections, and demyelinating disorders. CONCLUSION: Adalimumab dosed once per week alleviates moderate to severe HS. PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE: Abbott Laboratories.

Cost per responder associated with biologic therapies for Crohn's disease, psoriasis, and rheumatoid arthritis.

INTRODUCTION: Biologic therapies have demonstrated efficacy and safety in several chronic systemic disorders. The authors indirectly compared response rates and costs per responder associated with biologic treatments for moderate-to-severe Crohn's disease (CD), psoriasis (Ps), and/or rheumatoid arthritis (RA). METHODS: A systematic literature search was performed to identify phase 3 randomized controlled trials of biologics for CD (adalimumab, infliximab), Ps (adalimumab, etanercept, infliximab, ustekinumab 45 mg, ustekinumab 90 mg), or methotrexate-refractory RA (abatacept, adalimumab, certolizumab, etanercept, golimumab, infliximab, rituximab, tocilizumab). Food and Drug Administration-approved dosing schedules were evaluated. Published response rates were extracted, with response defined in CD, Ps, and RA as: ≥70-point reduction in CD Activity Index at 12 months; ≥75% improvement in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index at 3 months; and ≥50% improvement in American College of Rheumatology component scores at 6 months. Within each indication, mixed-treatment comparison meta-analyses were conducted to derive pooled estimates and 95% CIs of response rate difference versus placebo for each biologic, adjusting for cross-trial variation in control-arm response rates. Cost per responder was estimated for each biologic as projected per patient drug costs (2011 US$) divided by response rate difference. RESULTS: Altogether, 23 publications were selected. In CD, 12-month cost per responder was estimated at $116,291 (95% CI $71,637-208,348) for adalimumab and $125,169 (95% CI $60,532-267,101) for infliximab. Among biologics approved in Ps, 3-month cost per responder was lowest for adalimumab ($9,756; 95% CI $8,668-11,131), infliximab ($12,828; 95% CI $11,772-13,922), and ustekinumab 45 mg ($13,821; 95% CI $12,599-15,167). In RA, biologics with the lowest 6-month cost per responder were adalimumab ($27,853; 95% CI $19,284-40,270), etanercept ($29,140; 95% CI $14,170-61,030), and tocilizumab ($31,363; 95% CI $14,713-64,232). CONCLUSION: Meta-analyses of clinical trials found considerable variation in cost-effectiveness of biologic therapies for CD, Ps, and RA. These results may help determine biologic utilization in these chronic diseases.

Comparison of medical costs among patients using adalimumab and infliximab: a retrospective study (COMPAIRS).

BACKGROUND: Anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF) medications have similar efficacy in Crohn's disease (CD), but have not been compared in the real world. This study compared health costs and utilization for patients with CD newly initiating anti-TNF therapy with adalimumab (ADA) or infliximab (IFX) by using insurance data. METHODS: CD patients initiating ADA or IFX therapy were identified from the MarketScan database. ADA and IFX groups were matched using a propensity score. The primary endpoint was direct costs of healthcare for the 6 months following initiation. The secondary endpoints compared healthcare utilization between groups. RESULTS: After propensity matching, characteristics were similar between the ADA (n = 623) and IFX (n = 623) groups. During the 6-month interval following anti-TNF initiation, healthcare costs were significantly lower for ADA compared with IFX. Total healthcare cost was $18,885 for ADA and $24,355 for IFX, a difference in cost of $5,470 (P < 0.0001). CD-related costs made up the majority of the costs: $16,454 for ADA and $22,316 for IFX (P < 0.0001). The largest difference in cost was seen in outpatient visits: $2,082 difference between the two groups (P < 0.0001). Both all-cause and CD-related hospitalization decreased for both ADA and IFX groups. Emergency room and hospitalization use in the 6-month follow-up period was not statistically different between groups, although numerically slightly higher in the IFX group. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with CD using ADA had lower healthcare costs than patients using IFX; this difference was partly driven by outpatient medical costs.

Risks of developing psychiatric disorders in pediatric patients with psoriasis.

BACKGROUND: Symptoms of psoriasis can be embarrassing and distressing, and may increase risk of developing psychiatric disorders in young people. OBJECTIVE: We sought to compare incidences of psychiatric disorders between pediatric patients with psoriasis and psoriasis-free control subjects. METHODS: Patients (<18 years) with continuous health plan enrollment 6 months before and after first psoriasis diagnosis (index date) were selected (Thomson Reuters MarketScan database, 2000-2006 [Thomson Reuters, New York, NY]). Patients with psoriasis (N = 7404) were matched 1:5 on age and sex to psoriasis-free control subjects (N = 37,020). Patients were followed from index date to first diagnosis of a psychiatric disorder (ie, alcohol/drug abuse, depression, anxiety disorder, bipolar disorder, suicidal ideation, eating disorder), end of data availability, or disenrollment. Patients with psychiatric diagnoses or psychotropic medication use before the index date were excluded. Cox proportional hazard models controlling for age, sex, and comorbidities were used to estimate the effect of psoriasis on risks of developing psychiatric disorders. RESULTS: Patients with psoriasis were significantly more at risk of developing psychiatric disorders versus control subjects (5.13% vs 4.07%; P = .0001; hazard ratio = 1.25; P = .0001), especially depression (3.01% vs 2.42%; P = .0036; hazard ratio = 1.25; P = .0053) and anxiety (1.81% vs 1.35%; P = .0048; hazard ratio = 1.32; P = .0045). LIMITATIONS: Retrospective, observational studies of medical claims data are typically limited by overall quality and completeness of data and accuracy of coding for diagnoses and procedures. CONCLUSIONS: Pediatric patients with psoriasis had an increased risk of developing psychiatric disorders, including depression and anxiety, compared with psoriasis-free control subjects.

The effects of adalimumab treatment and psoriasis severity on self-reported work productivity and activity impairment for patients with moderate to severe psoriasis.

BACKGROUND: Psoriasis significantly impairs work productivity and daily activities. OBJECTIVES: We sought to examine the effects of adalimumab on psoriasis-related work productivity and activity impairment and associations between the impairment and psoriasis severity in patients with moderate to severe psoriasis. METHODS: Data were from the first 16 weeks of the Randomized controlled EValuation of adalimumab Every other week dosing in moderate to severe psoriasis TriAL (REVEAL). Outcomes as measured by the Work Productivity and Activity Impairment Questionnaire for Psoriasis (WPAI-Psoriasis) included employment status, total work productivity impairment, and total activity impairment. Logistic regression and analyses of covariance were used to assess the effects of adalimumab and treatment response (≥ 75% improvement in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index responders) on WPAI-Psoriasis outcomes. Longitudinal generalized estimating equations and Pearson correlation coefficients were used to assess associations between WPAI outcomes and psoriasis severity. RESULTS: Greater improvements in total work productivity impairment and total activity impairment were observed with adalimumab treatment versus placebo (15.5 and 11.1 percentage points, respectively; P < .001). Unemployment rate, total work productivity impairment, and total activity impairment were significantly associated with greater baseline psoriasis severity. Changes in WPAI outcomes were significantly correlated with greater psoriasis severity. The Dermatology Life Quality Index had stronger associations with changes in WPAI outcomes compared with clinical severity measures (Psoriasis Area and Severity Index and Physician Global Assessment). LIMITATIONS: REVEAL only included WPAI data for 16 weeks. Therefore, long-term impact of adalimumab treatment on productivity outcomes could not be assessed. In addition, information on occupational job title or industry was not collected and data were not adjusted for psoriatic arthritis. CONCLUSIONS: Adalimumab reduced psoriasis-related work productivity and activity impairment in patients with moderate to severe psoriasis.

Effect of adalimumab on clinical laboratory parameters in patients with Crohn's disease: results from the CHARM trial.

BACKGROUND: Nutritional deficiencies and anemia are common in Crohn's disease (CD). METHODS: We evaluated the effect of adalimumab on changes in laboratory values using data from CHARM, in which patients were randomized to adalimumab 40 mg every other week (eow), adalimumab 40 mg weekly, or placebo for 56 weeks. Mean changes in laboratory values from baseline to Weeks 26 and 56 were compared between adalimumab and placebo using analysis of covariance models. Percentages of patients with suboptimal laboratory values at Weeks 26 and 56 were compared between treatment groups using Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel (CMH) tests. Pearson correlation coefficients for associations between changes in Crohn's Disease Activity Index (CDAI) score and changes in laboratory values were estimated at Weeks 4, 26, and 56. RESULTS: The intention-to-treat analysis included 778 patients randomized to adalimumab eow (N = 260), adalimumab weekly (N = 257), or placebo (N = 261). Baseline abnormalities in laboratory values were common across treatment groups. CMH tests revealed significantly lesser rates of suboptimal laboratory values with adalimumab vs. placebo at Week 26, including hypoalbuminemia, calcium deficiency, low hemoglobin, low hematocrit, low red blood cell count, elevated platelet count, and elevated C-reactive protein concentration (all P < 0.05). These improvements persisted at Week 56. Improvements in CDAI from baseline to Weeks 4, 26, and 56 were significantly correlated with changes from baseline for albumin, hemoglobin, and C-reactive protein (all P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Adalimumab therapy for moderately to severely active CD was associated with significant improvements in nutritional, hematologic, and inflammatory markers.

Adalimumab real-world dosage pattern and predictors of weekly dosing: patients with Crohn's disease in the United States.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: To determine the real-world dosage pattern of adalimumab and predictors for weekly dosing in Crohn's disease (CD). METHODS: Patients with CD receiving adalimumab maintenance therapy (≥3 dispensing events within 1 year) were identified from a large specialty pharmacy database in the United States (March 2007-July 2008). Weekly dosing rates (≥2 consecutive weekly doses after the first dispensing event) for a 12-month period were estimated with Kaplan-Meier methods. Predictors for weekly dosing were identified using Cox proportional-hazards regression. RESULTS: The overall adalimumab weekly dosing rate was 11.3% (151 of 1335 patients). The 12-month cumulative risk of weekly dosing was 15.5%. Patients who received a 160-/80-mg induction regimen had half the risk for weekly dosing compared with other induction regimens (hazard ratio, 0.48; 95% confidence intervals 0.33-0.7; p<0.0001). Weekly dosing rates were significantly lower in the West and South vs. the Northeast. CONCLUSIONS: The adalimumab weekly dosing rate in a real-world, managed-care setting is less than that in clinical trials and academic centres. Geographic region and not starting on 160-/80-mg induction therapy were significantly associated with weekly adalimumab use for patients with CD.

Effect of adalimumab on work productivity and indirect costs in moderate to severe Crohn's disease: a meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the effect of adalimumab on work productivity and indirect costs in patients with Crohn's disease (CD) using a meta-analysis of clinical trials. METHODS: Study-level results were pooled from all clinical trials of adalimumab for moderate to severe CD in which work productivity outcomes were evaluated. Work Productivity and Activity Impairment Questionnaire outcomes (absenteeism, presenteeism and total work productivity impairment [TWPI]) were extracted from adalimumab trials. Meta-analyses were used to estimate pooled averages and 95% CIs of one-year accumulated reductions in work productivity impairment with adalimumab. Pooled averages were multiplied by the 2008 United States national average annual salary ($44,101) to estimate per-patient indirect cost savings during the year following adalimumab initiation. RESULTS: The four included trials (ACCESS, CARE, CHOICE and EXTEND) represented a total of 1202 employed adalimumab-treated patients at baseline. Each study followed patients for a minimum of 20 weeks. Pooled estimates (95% CIs) of one-year accumulated work productivity improvements were as follows: -9% (-10% to -7%) for absenteeism; -22% (-26% to -18%) for presenteeism; and -25% (-30% to -20%) for TWPI. Reductions in absenteeism and TWPI translated into per-patient indirect cost savings (95% CI) of $3,856 ($3,183 to $4,529) and $10,964 ($8,833 to $13,096), respectively. CONCLUSION: Adalimumab provided clinically meaningful improvements in work productivity among patients with moderate to severe CD, which may translate into substantial indirect cost savings from an employer's perspective.