Anthropogenic triggering of large earthquakes.

The physical mechanism of the anthropogenic triggering of large earthquakes on active faults is studied on the basis of experimental phenomenology, i.e., that earthquakes occur on active tectonic faults, that crustal stress values are those measured in situ and, on active faults, comply to the values of the stress drop measured for real earthquakes, that the static friction coefficients are those inferred on faults, and that the effective triggering stresses are those inferred for real earthquakes. Deriving the conditions for earthquake nucleation as a time-dependent solution of the Tresca-Von Mises criterion applied in the framework of poroelasticity yields that active faults can be triggered by fluid overpressures < 0.1 MPa. Comparing this with the deviatoric stresses at the depth of crustal hypocenters, which are of the order of 1-10 MPa, we find that injecting in the subsoil fluids at the pressures typical of oil and gas production and storage may trigger destructive earthquakes on active faults at a few tens of kilometers. Fluid pressure propagates as slow stress waves along geometric paths operating in a drained condition and can advance the natural occurrence of earthquakes by a substantial amount of time. Furthermore, it is illusory to control earthquake triggering by close monitoring of minor "foreshocks", since the induction may occur with a delay up to several years.

The seismic noise wavefield is not diffuse.

Passive seismology is burgeoning under the apparent theoretical support of diffuse acoustics. However, basic physical arguments suggest that this theory may not be applicable to seismic noise. A procedure is developed to establish the applicability of the diffuse field paradigm to a wavefield, based on testing the latter for azimuthal isotropy and spatial homogeneity. This procedure is then applied to the seismic noise recorded at 65 sites covering a wide variety of environmental and subsoil conditions. Considering the instantaneous oscillation vector measured at single triaxial stations, the hypothesis of azimuthal isotropy is rejected in all cases with high confidence, which makes the spatial homogeneity test unnecessary and leads directly to conclude that the seismic noise wavefield is not diffuse. However, such a conclusion has no practical effect on passive imaging, which is also possible in non-diffuse wavefields.

Nondiffuse elastic and anelastic passive imaging.

The property at the basis of passive acoustic imaging is that, taken any two points, one of them can be seen as the source of the waves and the other as the recording station. This property, which was shown to hold also in nondiffuse fields, is here exploited: (1) to allow an undistorted passive imaging through the simple use of the statistical mode to estimate wave velocity, (2) to determine the azimuth of the instantaneous Huygens sources of the noise wavefield, and (3) to measure, provided that the noise bandwidth is wide with respect to that of the local system, the material dissipation constant as a function of frequency. The authors applied this theory to study the seismic noise field in the Ravenna, North-Central Italy, shore area and found it capable to provide velocity dispersion curves matching those of independent surveys, to track the sources of seismic noise to a few major firms in Ravenna port, with the prevailing source switching at the time scale of seconds, and to measure the dissipation quality factor Q at approximately 20 independent of frequency in the range 1-30 Hz.

Passive imaging in nondiffuse acoustic wavefields.

A main property of diffuse acoustic wavefields is that, taken any two points, each of them can be seen as the source of waves and the other as the recording station. This property is shown to follow simply from array azimuthal selectivity and Huygens principle in a locally isotropic wavefield. Without time reversal, this property holds approximately also in anisotropic azimuthally uniform wavefields, implying much looser constraints for undistorted passive imaging than those required by a diffuse field. A notable example is the seismic noise field, which is generally nondiffuse, but is found to be compatible with a finite aperture anisotropic uniform wavefield. The theoretical predictions were confirmed by an experiment on seismic noise in the mainland of Venice, Italy.