Comparison of Efficacy of Pressure Controlled vs. Traditional Manual Mask Ventilation for Newborn Resuscitation - A Simulation-Based Pilot Randomized Control Trial.

OBJECTIVES: To determine efficacy of non-invasive positive pressure face mask ventilation using a ventilator device (NIPPmV) for achieving early effective ventilation compared to that by self-inflating bag (SIB) or T- piece resuscitator (TPR). METHODS: The authors video recorded 33 trained resuscitators using NIPPmV (provided using ventilator device), SIB [a 500 ml silicone SIB without a positive end expiratory pressure (PEEP) valve] and a TPR. Using a continuous pressure recording system and a neonatal manikin, the authors evaluated the efficacy of the ventilation to achieve early effective ventilation during 30 s of ventilation. The primary outcome was time to achieve effective chest rise. Secondary outcomes were peak inspiratory pressure (PIP), ventilation rate and the need to perform ventilation corrective steps during positive pressure ventilation (PPV) among the devices. RESULTS: Total 99 videos were recorded. The time(s) taken to achieve the first chest rise was significantly lesser in NIPPmV group compared to SIB and TPR (3.0 ± 1.7 vs. 3.7 ± 1.9 vs. 7.5 ± 5.4, respectively, p <0.001). The mean PIP delivered by NIPPmV compared to SIB & TPR (19.8 ± 1.6 vs. 35.6 ± 7.4 vs. 17.8 ± 2.0 cm H20 respectively; p <0.001) was more accurate with preset PIP. Ventilation, in terms of breath rate, was observed to be controlled more accurately with NIPPmV compared to SIB & TPR (50 vs. 42 vs. 33 per min respectively; p <0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The non-invasive positive pressure face mask ventilation using a ventilator (NIPPmV) resulted in achieving early, effective and consistent ventilation.

Conversion from calcineurin inhibitors to sirolimus for chronic renal allograft dysfunction: a systematic review of the evidence.

BACKGROUND: Conversion from a calcineurin inhibitor to sirolimus has been used as a strategy to improve deteriorating renal allograft function but the efficacy and safety of this intervention is unknown. METHODS: We performed a systematic review of studies that involved conversion from a calcineurin inhibitor to sirolimus in kidney transplantation. The search yielded five randomized trials (n=1,040 patients) and 25 nonrandomized studies (n=977 patients). RESULTS: In the randomized trials, conversion to sirolimus improved short-term creatinine clearance (weighted mean difference 6.4 mL/min; 95% CI 1.9 to 11.0) compared to controls. In the nonrandomized studies, renal function improved or stabilized in 66% (95% CI 61% to 72%), creatinine clearance improved (weighted mean change 5.7 mL/min; 95% CI 1.4 to 10.1), cholesterol increased (weighted mean change 20.8 mg/dL; 95% CI 11.2 to 30.4) and triglycerides increased (weighted mean change 40.1 mg/dL; 95% CI 18.6 to 61.7). Sirolimus was discontinued by 28% of patients (95% CI 0 to 59%) in the randomized trials and 17% (95% CI 12 to 22%) in the nonrandomized trials. CONCLUSION: Conversion to sirolimus is associated with an improvement in short-term renal function. However, given the discontinuation rate and potential side effects, adequately powered randomized trials with longer follow-up of hard outcomes are needed to determine whether this strategy leads to a lasting benefit in the clinical care of transplant recipients.

Calcineurin inhibitor withdrawal from sirolimus-based therapy in kidney transplantation: a systematic review of randomized trials.

Calcineurin inhibitor (CNI) withdrawal has been used as a strategy to improve renal allograft function, however, it also carries risk of acute rejection. We conducted a systematic review of randomized trials that involved CNI withdrawal from a sirolimus-based immunosuppressive regimen. The search strategy yielded six trials (n = 1047 patients) reported in eight publications. CNI withdrawal from sirolimus-based therapy, was associated with an increased risk of acute rejection (risk difference, 6%; 95% CI 2-10%, p = 0.002) but a higher creatinine clearance (mean difference, 7.49 mL/min; 95% CI 5.08-9.89 mL/min, p < 0.00001) at 1 year compared to continued CNI and sirolimus therapy. Graft loss (relative risk, 0.87; 95% CI 0.46-1.64, p = 0.66) and death (relative risk, 0.88; CI 0.40-1.96, p = 0.76) were similar in both groups at 1 year. Hypertension was significantly reduced in the CNI withdrawal group (relative risk, 0.56; 95% CI 0.40-0.78, p = 0.0006). CNI withdrawal from sirolimus-based therapy is associated with an increased risk of acute rejection in the short term with a significant improvement in renal function and a reduction in hypertension. Longer follow-up is needed to determine if these changes will result in a significant improvement in patient and graft survival.