Does Loosening the Inclusion Criteria of the CROSS Trial Impact Outcomes in the Curative-Intent Trimodality Treatment of Oesophageal and Gastroesophageal Cancer Patients?

AIM: To determine the efficacy of preoperative chemoradiotherapy as per the CROSS protocol for oesophageal/gastroesophageal junction cancer (OEGEJC), when expanded to patients outside of the inclusion/exclusion criteria defined in the original clinical trial. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Data were collected retrospectively on 229 OEGEJC patients referred for curative-intent preoperative chemoradiotherapy. Outcomes including pathological complete response (pCR), overall survival (OS), cancer-specific survival and recurrence-free survival (RFS) of patients who met CROSS inclusion criteria (MIC) versus those who failed to meet criteria (FMIC) were determined. RESULTS: In total, 42.8% of patients MIC, whereas 57.2% FMIC; 16.6% of patients did not complete definitive surgery. The MIC cohort had higher rates of pCR, when compared with the FMIC cohort (33.3% versus 20.6%, P = 0.039). The MIC cohort had a better RFS, cancer-specific survival and OS compared with the FMIC cohort (P = 0.006, P = 0.004 and P = 0.009, respectively). Age >75 years and pretreatment weight loss >10% were not associated with a poorer RFS (P = 0.541 and 0.458, respectively). Compared with stage I-III patients, stage IVa was associated with a poorer RFS (hazard ratio (HR) = 2.158; 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.339-3.480, P = 0.001). Tumours >8 cm in length or >5 cm in width had a trend towards worse RFS (HR = 2.060; 95% CI = 0.993-4.274, P = 0.052). CONCLUSION: Our study showed that the robust requirements of the CROSS trial may limit treatment for patients with potentially curable OEGEJC and can be adapted to include patients with a good performance status who are older than 75 years or have >10% pretreatment weight loss. However, the inclusion of patients with celiac nodal metastases or tumours >8 cm in length or >5 cm in width may be associated with poor outcomes.

Report from the 17th Annual Western Canadian Gastrointestinal Cancer Consensus Conference; Edmonton, Alberta; 11-12 September 2015.

The 17th annual Western Canadian Gastrointestinal Cancer Consensus Conference (wcgccc) was held in Edmonton, Alberta, 11-12 September 2015. The wcgccc is an interactive multidisciplinary conference attended by health care professionals from across Western Canada (British Columbia, Alberta, Saskatchewan, and Manitoba) who are involved in the care of patients with gastrointestinal cancer. Surgical, medical, and radiation oncologists; pathologists; radiologists; and allied health care professionals participated in presentation and discussion sessions for the purposes of developing the recommendations presented here. This consensus statement addresses current issues in the management of gastric cancer.

One compared with two cycles of mitomycin C in chemoradiotherapy for anal cancer: analysis of outcomes and toxicity.

BACKGROUND: Concurrent chemoradiation with fluorouracil (5fu) and mitomycin C (mmc) is standard treatment for anal canal carcinoma (acc). The current protocol in Alberta is administration of 5fu and mmc during weeks 1 and 5 of radiation. However, administration of the second bolus of mmc has been based largely on centre preference. Given limited published data on outcomes with different mmc regimens, our objective was to compare the efficacy and toxicity of 1 compared with 2 cycles of mmc in acc treatment. METHODS: Our retrospective study evaluated 169 acc patients treated with radical chemoradiotherapy between 2000 and 2010 at two tertiary cancer centres. All patients were treated with 2 cycles of 5fu and with 1 cycle (mmc1) or 2 cycles (mmc2) of mmc. Acute toxicities, disease-free (dfs) and overall survival (os) were analyzed. RESULTS: Baseline demographics, performance status, and stage were similar in the groups of patients who received mmc1 (52%) and mmc2 (48%). Before treatment, median hematologic parameters were comparable, except for white blood cell count, which was higher in the mmc2 group, but within normal range. The 5-year os and dfs were similar (75.1% and 54.2% for mmc1 vs. 70.7% and 44.2% for mmc2, p = 0.98 and p = 0.63 respectively). On multivariate analysis, mmc2 was the factor most strongly associated with specific acute toxicities: grade 3+ leukopenia (hazard ratio: 4.82; p < 0.01), grade 3+ skin toxicity (hazard ratio: 4.76; p < 0.001), and hospitalizations secondary to febrile neutropenia (hazard ratio: 9.91; p = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: In definitive chemoradiotherapy for acc, 1 cycle of mmc appears to offer outcomes similar to those achieved with 2 cycles, with significantly less acute toxicity.

Oral administration of rapamycin and cyclosporine differentially alter intestinal function in rabbits.

The immunosuppressive drugs rapamycin (Rap) and cyclosporine A (CsA) are used clinically to modify or abolish immune-mediated functions. This study examined the effect of orally administered regimens of Rap, CsA, and a combination of Rap/CsA on intestinal function in male New Zealand white rabbits. Animals received oral doses of CsA (15 mg/kg/body weight/day), low-dose (LD) and high-dose (HD) Rap (0.25 or 1 mg/kg/body wt/day, respectively), or Rap/CsA (0.25 and 5 mg/kg/body wt/day, or 0.5 and 5 mg/kg/body wt/day, respectively) for 20 days. We measured in vitro uptake of nutrients and permeability, and morphometric measurements in the jejunum and ileum were made. Animals receiving HD-Rap or HD-Rap/CsA had decreased food intake, body weight, and intestinal weight, when compared with LD-Rap, LD-Rap/CsA, CsA, or controls. The maximal transport rate (Vmax) for the active jejunal uptake of D-glucose was increased in HD-Rap and CsA, but not in the HD-Rap/CsA-treated animals. The jejunal Vmax of D-glucose in the LD-Rap- or -Rap/CsA-treated animals was no different from controls. In the HD-Rap- and HD-Rap/ CsA-treated animals, jejunal rates of uptake of stearic, linoleic, and linolenic acids were reduced when compared with controls. Jejunal and ileal permeability (as assessed by the passive uptake of L-glucose, tissue conductance, and mucosal-to-serosal flux of [3H]inulin) was increased in animals treated with HD-Rap or HD-Rap/CsA, when compared with CsA or controls. These parameters of permeability were no different at lower doses of Rap or Rap/CsA. The jejunal and ileal villous surface area was increased in CsA, but decreased in HD-Rap or HD-Rap/CsA animals. Thus, HD-Rap given alone or in combination with CsA reduced body weight gain, in part due to reduced food intake and malabsorption of lipids, which was due at least in part to reduced intestinal surface area. The relevance of these findings to patients undergoing chronic immunosuppressive drug therapy needs to be established.