Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 30
Filter
1.
Int J Cancer ; 154(8): 1474-1483, 2024 Apr 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38151749

ABSTRACT

Testicular cancer survivors (TCS) treated with platinum-based chemotherapy have an increased risk of colorectal cancer (CRC). We determined the yield of colonoscopy in TCS to assess its potential in reducing CRC incidence and mortality. We conducted a colonoscopy screening study among TCS in four Dutch hospitals to assess the yield of colorectal neoplasia. Neoplasia was defined as adenomas, serrated polyps (SPs), advanced adenomas (AAs: ≥10 mm diameter, high-grade dysplasia or ≥25% villous component), advanced serrated polyps (ASPs: ≥10 mm diameter or dysplasia) or CRC. Advanced neoplasia (AN) was defined as AA, ASP or CRC. Colonoscopy yield was compared to average-risk American males who underwent screening colonoscopy (n = 24,193) using a propensity score matched analysis, adjusted for age, smoking status, alcohol consumption and body mass index. A total of 137 TCS underwent colonoscopy. Median age was 50 years among TCS (IQR 43-57) vs 55 years (IQR 51-62) among American controls. A total of 126 TCS were matched to 602 controls. The prevalence of AN was higher in TCS than in controls (8.7% vs 1.7%; P = .0002). Nonadvanced adenomas and SPs were detected in 45.2% of TCS vs 5.5% of controls (P < .0001). No lesions were detected in 46.0% of TCS vs 92.9% of controls (P < .0001). TCS treated with platinum-based chemotherapy have a higher prevalence of neoplasia and AN than matched controls. These results support our hypothesis that platinum-based chemotherapy increases the risk of colorectal neoplasia in TCS. Cost-effectiveness studies are warranted to ascertain the threshold of AN prevalence that justifies the recommendation of colonoscopy for TCS.


Subject(s)
Adenoma , Cancer Survivors , Colonic Polyps , Colorectal Neoplasms , Neoplasms, Germ Cell and Embryonal , Testicular Neoplasms , Male , Humans , Middle Aged , Colonic Polyps/epidemiology , Testicular Neoplasms/drug therapy , Testicular Neoplasms/epidemiology , Prevalence , Colonoscopy , Colorectal Neoplasms/drug therapy , Colorectal Neoplasms/epidemiology , Colorectal Neoplasms/diagnosis , Adenoma/pathology , Risk Factors
2.
World J Urol ; 41(7): 1837-1845, 2023 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37258902

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To evaluate guideline adherence and variation in the recommended use of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) and the effects of this variation on survival in patients with non-metastatic muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: In this nationwide, Netherlands Cancer Registry-based study, we identified 1025 patients newly diagnosed with non-metastatic MIBC between November 2017 and November 2019 who underwent radical cystectomy. Patients with ECOG performance status 0-1 and creatinine clearance ≥ 50 mL/min/1.73 m2 were considered NAC-eligible. Interhospital variation was assessed using case-mix adjusted multilevel analysis. A Cox proportional hazards model was used to evaluate the association between hospital specific probability of using NAC and survival. All analyses were stratified by disease stage (cT2 versus cT3-4a). RESULTS: In total, of 809 NAC-eligible patients, only 34% (n = 277) received NAC. Guideline adherence for NAC in cT2 was 26% versus 55% in cT3-4a disease. Interhospital variation was 7-57% and 31-62%, respectively. A higher hospital specific probability of NAC might be associated with a better survival, but results were not statistically significant (HRcT2 = 0.59, 95% CI 0.33-1.05 and HRcT3-4a = 0.71, 95% CI 0.25-2.04). CONCLUSION: Guideline adherence regarding NAC use is low and interhospital variation is large, especially for patients with cT2-disease. Although not significant, our data suggest that survival of patients diagnosed in hospitals more inclined to give NAC might be better. Further research is warranted to elucidate the underlying mechanism. As literature clearly shows the potential survival benefit of NAC in patients with cT3-4a disease, better guideline adherence might be pursued.


Subject(s)
Neoadjuvant Therapy , Urinary Bladder Neoplasms , Humans , Neoadjuvant Therapy/methods , Urinary Bladder Neoplasms/drug therapy , Urinary Bladder Neoplasms/surgery , Urinary Bladder Neoplasms/pathology , Urinary Bladder/pathology , Cystectomy/methods , Muscles , Chemotherapy, Adjuvant , Neoplasm Invasiveness , Retrospective Studies
3.
Eur J Cancer Care (Engl) ; 31(4): e13594, 2022 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35416333

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: The shared decision-making (SDM) process for the treatment of pancreatic and oesophageal cancer primarily takes place with healthcare professionals (HCPs) in the hospital setting. This study aims to explore the perspectives of general practitioners (GPs) on their possible roles during this SDM process, their added value and their requirements for involvement in SDM. METHODS: Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 12 GPs about their views on SDM for patients with cancer. The interviews were analysed by two researchers using an inductive open coding approach. RESULTS: Five potential roles in SDM were described by the interviewed GPs, of which the role as 'coach' of the patient was mentioned by all. GPs see their main added value as their long-standing relationship with the patient. To be able to participate optimally in SDM, GPs indicated that they need to be kept up to date during the patient's care process and should receive enough medical information about treatment options and contextual information. CONCLUSION: GPs see different potential roles for themselves when involved in SDM. Hospital HCPs that want to facilitate GP involvement should take the initiative, provide the GPs with enough and timely information and must be easy to consult.


Subject(s)
General Practitioners , Neoplasms , Decision Making , Decision Making, Shared , Humans , Neoplasms/therapy , Patient Participation , Qualitative Research , Referral and Consultation
4.
BMC Cancer ; 22(1): 228, 2022 Mar 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35236333

ABSTRACT

AIM: In the registration trial, cabozantinib exposure ≥ 750 ng/mL correlated to improved tumor size reduction, response rate and progression free survival (PFS) in patients with metastatic renal cell cancer (mRCC). Because patients in routine care often differ from patients in clinical trials, we explored the cabozantinib exposure-response relationship in patients with mRCC treated in routine care. METHODS: Cabozantinib trough concentrations (Cmin) were collected and average exposure was calculated per individual. Exposure-response analyses were performed using the earlier identified target of Cmin > 750 ng/mL and median Cmin. In addition, the effect of dose reductions on response was explored. PFS was used as measure of response. RESULTS: In total, 59 patients were included:10% were classified as favourable, 61% as intermediate and 29% as poor IMDC risk group, respectively. Median number of prior treatment lines was 2 (0-5). Starting dose was 60 mg in 46%, 40 mg in 42% and 20 mg in 12% of patients. Dose reductions were needed in 58% of patients. Median Cmin was 572 ng/mL (IQR: 496-701). Only 17% of patients had an average Cmin ≥ 750 ng/mL. Median PFS was 52 weeks (95% CI: 40-64). No improved PFS was observed for patients with Cmin ≥ 750 ng/mL or ≥ 572 ng/ml. A longer PFS was observed for patients with a dose reduction vs. those without (65 vs. 31 weeks, p = .001). After incorporating known covariates (IMDC risk group and prior treatment lines (< 2 vs. ≥ 2)) in the multivariable analysis, the need for dose reduction remained significantly associated with improved PFS (HR 0.32, 95% CI:0.14-0.70, p = .004). CONCLUSION: In these explorative analyses, no clear relationship between increased cabozantinib exposure and improved PFS was observed. Average cabozantinib exposure was below the previously proposed target in 83% of patients. Future studies should focus on validating the cabozantinib exposure required for long term efficacy.


Subject(s)
Anilides/administration & dosage , Antineoplastic Agents/administration & dosage , Carcinoma, Renal Cell/drug therapy , Drug Monitoring/methods , Kidney Neoplasms/drug therapy , Pyridines/administration & dosage , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Algorithms , Dose-Response Relationship, Drug , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Progression-Free Survival , Retrospective Studies , Treatment Outcome
5.
Cancer Chemother Pharmacol ; 89(2): 271-274, 2022 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34853912

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Pazopanib and sunitinib are oral tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) approved for the treatment of renal cell carcinoma. For both oncolytics, a clear target trough concentration level in plasma has been defined above which improved clinical efficacy can be expected. However, many factors can alter TKI exposure, including disease characteristics. CASE: A 79-year old male with metastatic papillary renal cell carcinoma and malignant ascites was treated with pazopanib. Initially, treatment with pazopanib at adequate trough concentrations resulted in regression of ascites. After a 6-month puncture-free interval, paracenteses were again required and the plasma trough concentration of pazopanib had decreased to 5 mg/L without any dose adjustments. Despite a dose increase, pazopanib levels remained subtherapeutic and could not prevent new paracenteses. Pazopanib concentrations in the drained ascites fluid were comparable to plasma concentrations and remained high also after treatment discontinuation. This observation suggests that the ascites compartment may act as a third space in which pazopanib accumulates. During subsequent treatment with sunitinib, a similar distribution over ascites fluid was observed. CONCLUSION: Presence of ascites or pleural effusion in patients treated with TKIs may lead to subtherapeutic plasma exposure, which may hamper treatment efficacy. Measuring TKIs plasma concentrations regularly during treatment is essential to identify patients with subtherapeutic exposure.


Subject(s)
Ascites/drug therapy , Carcinoma, Renal Cell/drug therapy , Kidney Neoplasms/drug therapy , Protein Kinase Inhibitors/pharmacokinetics , Aged , Carcinoma, Renal Cell/pathology , Dose-Response Relationship, Drug , Humans , Indazoles/administration & dosage , Indazoles/pharmacokinetics , Kidney Neoplasms/pathology , Male , Protein Kinase Inhibitors/administration & dosage , Pyrimidines/administration & dosage , Pyrimidines/pharmacokinetics , Sulfonamides/administration & dosage , Sulfonamides/pharmacokinetics , Sunitinib/administration & dosage , Sunitinib/pharmacokinetics , Treatment Outcome
6.
Int J Cancer ; 150(2): 308-316, 2022 01 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34494665

ABSTRACT

Cabozantinib is registered in fixed 60 mg dose. However, 46% to 62% of patients in the registration studies needed a dose reduction due to toxicity. Improved clinical efficacy has been observed in renal cell carcinoma patients (RCC) with a cabozantinib exposure greater than 750 µg/L. In our study we explored the cabozantinib exposure in patients with different tumour types. We included RCC patients from routine care and salivary gland carcinoma (SGC) patients from a phase II study with ≥1 measured Cmin at steady-state. The geometric mean (GM) Cmin at the starting dose, at 40 mg and at best tolerated dose (BTD) were compared between both tumour types. Forty-seven patients were included. All SGC patients (n = 22) started with 60 mg, while 52% of RCC patients started with 40 mg. GM Cmin at the start dose was 1456 µg/L (95% CI: 1185-1789) vs 682 µg/L (95% CI: 572-812) (P < .001) for SGC and RCC patients, respectively. When dose-normalised to 40 mg, SGC patients had a significantly higher cabozantinib exposure compared to RCC patients (Cmin 971 µg/L [95% CI: 790-1193] vs 669 µg/L [95% CI: 568-788]) (P = .005). Dose reductions due to toxicity were needed in 91% and 60% of SGC and RCC patients, respectively. Median BTD was between 20 to 30 mg for SGC and 40 mg for RCC patients. GM Cmin at BTD were comparable between the SGC and the RCC group, 694 µg/L (95% CI: 584-824) vs 583 µg/L (95% CI: 496-671) (P = .1). The observed cabozantinib exposure at BTD of approximately 600 µg/L is below the previously proposed target. Surprisingly, a comparable exposure at BTD was reached at different dosages of cabozantinib for SGC patients compared to RCC patients Further research is warranted to identify the optimal exposure and starting dose to balance efficacy and toxicity.


Subject(s)
Anilides/adverse effects , Carcinoma, Renal Cell/drug therapy , Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions/pathology , Kidney Neoplasms/drug therapy , Pyridines/adverse effects , Salivary Gland Neoplasms/drug therapy , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Anilides/administration & dosage , Carcinoma, Renal Cell/pathology , Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions/etiology , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Kidney Neoplasms/pathology , Male , Middle Aged , Prognosis , Pyridines/administration & dosage , Retrospective Studies , Salivary Gland Neoplasms/pathology
7.
BMC Gastroenterol ; 21(1): 67, 2021 Feb 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33579196

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Testicular cancer (TC) survivors have an increased risk of various second primary malignancies. A recent cohort study detected an increased risk of colorectal cancer (CRC) in TC survivors treated with platinum-based chemotherapy with a hazard ratio of 3.9. CRC risk increased with higher cisplatin-dose. We know that colonoscopy surveillance in high-risk populations results in reduced incidence and mortality of CRC. TC survivors treated with platinum-based chemotherapy can potentially benefit from colonoscopy surveillance; however, to which extent is unknown. Furthermore, the pathogenesis of these secondary CRCs is unknown, and better insights into the carcinogenesis may affect surveillance decisions. METHODS: This prospective multicenter study will be performed in four Dutch hospitals. TC survivors are eligible if treated with ≥ 3 cycles of cisplatin before age 50. Colonoscopy will be performed ≥ 8 years after initial treatment (minimum and maximum ages at colonoscopy, 35 and 75 years, respectively). The primary aim of the study is the diagnostic yield of advanced neoplasia detected during colonoscopy. As secondary aim, we will evaluate the molecular profile of advanced colorectal neoplasia and will assess current platinum levels in blood and urine and correlate blood-platinum levels with prevalence of colorectal lesions. Furthermore, we will investigate effectiveness of fecal immunochemical testing (FIT) and burden of colonoscopy by two questionnaires. Demographic data, previous history, results of colonoscopy, hemoglobin level of FIT and results of molecular and platinum levels will be obtained. Yield of colonoscopy will be determined by detection rate of adenoma and serrated lesions, advanced adenoma detection rate and CRC detection rate. The MISCAN model will be used for cost-effectiveness analyses of CRC surveillance. With 234 participants undergoing colonoscopy, we can detect an absolute difference of 6% of advanced neoplasia with 80% power. DISCUSSION: TC survivors treated with cisplatin-based chemotherapy can benefit from CRC surveillance. Evaluation of the diagnostic performance and patient acceptance of CRC surveillance is of importance to develop surveillance recommendations. Insight into the carcinogenesis of cisplatin-related advanced colorectal lesions will contribute to CRC prevention in the increasing number of TC survivors. The results may also be important for the many other cancer survivors treated with platinum-based chemotherapy. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinical Trials: NCT04180033, November 27, 2019, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04180033 .


Subject(s)
Cancer Survivors , Colorectal Neoplasms , Testicular Neoplasms , Cohort Studies , Colonoscopy , Colorectal Neoplasms/diagnosis , Colorectal Neoplasms/drug therapy , Colorectal Neoplasms/epidemiology , Cross-Sectional Studies , Early Detection of Cancer , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Multicenter Studies as Topic , Platinum , Prospective Studies , Survivors , Testicular Neoplasms/drug therapy
8.
Clin Genitourin Cancer ; 19(3): 274.e1-274.e16, 2021 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33317946

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Nivolumab, a programmed death 1 inhibitor, has been approved as second-line treatment for advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC) in Europe since 2016. We investigated the toxicity and efficacy of nivolumab as well as potential predictive biomarkers in the Dutch population. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This was a retrospective, multicenter study of the Dutch national registry of nivolumab for the treatment of advanced RCC. The main outcome parameters included toxicity, objective response rate (ORR), overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), time to progression (TTP), and time to treatment failure (TTF). In addition, potential predictive and prognostic biomarkers for outcomes were evaluated. RESULTS: Data on 264 patients were available, of whom 42% were International Metastatic RCC Database Consortium (IMDC) poor risk at start of nivolumab, 16% had ≥ 3 lines of previous therapy, 7% had non-clear-cell RCC, 11% had brain metastases, and 20% were previously treated with everolimus. Grade 3/4 immune-related adverse events occurred in 15% of patients. The median OS was 18.7 months (95% confidence interval, 13.7-23.7 months). Progression occurred in 170 (64.4%) of 264 patients, with a 6-and 12-months TTP of 49.8% and 31.1%, respectively. The ORR was 18.6% (49 of 264; 95% confidence interval, 14%-23%). Elevated baseline lymphocytes were associated with improved PFS (P = .038) and elevated baseline lactate dehydrogenase with poor OS, PFS, and TTF (P = .000). On-treatment increase in eosinophils by week 8 predicted improved OS (P = .003), PFS (P = .000), and TTF (P = .014), whereas a decrease of neutrophils was associated with significantly better TTF (P = .023). CONCLUSIONS: The toxicity and efficacy of nivolumab for metastatic RCC after previous lines of therapy are comparable with the results in the pivotal phase III trial and other real-world data. On-treatment increase in eosinophil count is a potential biomarker for efficacy and warrants further investigation.


Subject(s)
Carcinoma, Renal Cell , Kidney Neoplasms , Biomarkers , Carcinoma, Renal Cell/drug therapy , Humans , Kidney Neoplasms/drug therapy , Netherlands , Nivolumab/adverse effects , Retrospective Studies
9.
Br J Clin Pharmacol ; 87(2): 326-335, 2021 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32358810

ABSTRACT

AIM: Sunitinib is an oral tyrosine kinase inhibitor approved for the treatment of renal cell carcinoma (RCC) and gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST). Because of the large interpatient pharmacokinetic variability and established exposure-response and exposure-toxicity relationships in clinical trial patients, therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) seems promising for optimizing sunitinib exposure. We aimed to investigate the relationship between sunitinib exposure and treatment outcome in a real-world patient cohort. METHODS: We performed a retrospective observational cohort study in 53 patients with metastatic RCC and 18 patients with metastatic GIST treated with sunitinib and receiving TDM-guided dosing. Time on treatment - as a surrogate for progression-free survival - in patients who achieved adequate sunitinib exposure was compared with patients who did not. Additionaly, the median sunitinib exposure was compared in patients with or without sunitinib-induced toxicity leading to dose reduction. RESULTS: The median time on treatment in patients with RCC who achieved adequate sunitinib exposure (n = 39) was 32 weeks, compared to 15 weeks in patients who did not achieve adequate sunitinib exposure (n = 12) (P = 0.244). In 29 patients (41%) with toxicity leading to dose reduction, sunitinib sum plasma trough concentration (Ctrough ) until dose reduction was significantly higher compared to patients without toxicity leading to dose reduction (median 60 ng/mL vs 44 ng/mL; P < 0.001) and reduced to comparable levels after dose reduction (44 ng/mL; P = 0.488). CONCLUSION: In our real-world patient cohort, patients with sunitinib-induced toxicity requiring dose reduction had significantly higher sunitinib exposure compared to patients without toxicity. The threshold for toxicity, however, was lower compared to that previously described in clinical trials.


Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Agents , Carcinoma, Renal Cell , Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors , Kidney Neoplasms , Antineoplastic Agents/adverse effects , Carcinoma, Renal Cell/drug therapy , Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors/drug therapy , Humans , Indoles/adverse effects , Kidney Neoplasms/drug therapy , Pyrroles/adverse effects , Retrospective Studies , Sunitinib/therapeutic use , Treatment Outcome
10.
Urol Oncol ; 38(12): 935.e9-935.e16, 2020 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32917503

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: Radical cystectomies (RCs) are increasingly centralized, but bladder cancer can be diagnosed in every hospital The aim of this study is to assess the variation between hospitals of diagnosis in a patient's chance to undergo a RC before and after the volume criteria for RCs, to identify factors associated with this variation and to assess its effect on survival. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Patients diagnosed with muscle-invasive bladder cancer (cT2-4a,N0/X,M0/X) without nodal or distant metastases between 2008 and 2016 were identified through the Netherlands Cancer Registry. Multilevel logistic regression analysis was used to investigate the hospital specific probability of undergoing a cystectomy. Cox proportional hazard regression analysis was used to assess the case-mix adjusted effect of hospital-specific probabilities on survival. RESULTS: Of the 9,215 included patients, 4,513 (49%) underwent a RC. The percentage of RCs varied between 7% and 83% by hospital of diagnosis before the introduction of the first volume criteria (i.e., 2008-2009; minimum of 10 RCs). This variation decreased slightly to 17%-77% after establishment of the second volume criteria (i.e., 2015-2016; minimum of 20 RCs). Age, cT-stage and comorbidity were inversely and socioeconomic status was positively associated with RC. Both being diagnosed in a community hospital and/or being diagnosed in a hospital fulfilling the RC volume criteria were associated with increased use of RC compared to academic hospitals and hospitals not fulfilling the volume criteria. For each 10% increase in the percentage of RC in the hospital of diagnosis, 2-year case-mix adjusted survival increased 4% (hazard ratio 0.96, 95% confidence interval 0.94-0.98). CONCLUSION: Probability of RC varied between hospitals of diagnosis and affected 2-year overall survival. Undergoing a RC was associated with age, cT-stage, socioeconomic status, type of hospital, and whether the hospital of diagnosis fulfilled the RC volume criteria. Future research is needed to identify patient, tumor, and hospital characteristics affecting utilization of curative treatment as this may benefit overall survival.


Subject(s)
Cystectomy/statistics & numerical data , Urinary Bladder Neoplasms/mortality , Urinary Bladder Neoplasms/surgery , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Female , Hospitals , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Neoplasm Invasiveness , Probability , Survival Rate , Urinary Bladder Neoplasms/pathology
11.
Clin Pharmacol Ther ; 106(5): 1076-1082, 2019 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31125423

ABSTRACT

Pazopanib is taken fasted in a fixed oral daily dose of 800 mg. We hypothesized that ingesting pazopanib with food may improve patients' comfort and reduce gastrointestinal (GI) adverse events. Therefore, we investigated the bioequivalent dose of pazopanib when taken with food compared with 800 mg pazopanib taken fasted. In addition, we investigated the differences in GI toxicity, patient satisfaction, and patient's preference for either intake. The intake of 600 mg pazopanib with food resulted in a bioequivalent exposure and was preferred over a standard pazopanib dose without food. No differences were seen in GI toxicities under both intake regimens. Patients seem to be more positive about their feelings about side effects and satisfaction with their therapy when pazopanib was taken with food. Forty-one of the patients (68%) preferred the intake with a continental breakfast.


Subject(s)
Angiogenesis Inhibitors/pharmacokinetics , Patient Preference , Patient Safety , Patient Satisfaction , Pyrimidines/pharmacokinetics , Sulfonamides/pharmacokinetics , Administration, Oral , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Angiogenesis Inhibitors/adverse effects , Area Under Curve , Dose-Response Relationship, Drug , Fasting , Female , Food-Drug Interactions/physiology , Half-Life , Humans , Indazoles , Male , Metabolic Clearance Rate , Middle Aged , Pyrimidines/adverse effects , Sulfonamides/adverse effects , Young Adult
12.
Target Oncol ; 13(5): 641-648, 2018 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30259313

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Treating breast cancer patients with everolimus and exemestane can be challenging due to toxicity and suboptimal treatment responses. OBJECTIVE: We investigated whether everolimus exposure and early metabolic response are predictors for toxicity and effectiveness in these patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We performed pharmacokinetic assessments 14 and 35 days after starting treatment. [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography (18F-FDG-PET) was performed at baseline, and 14 and 35 days after the start of the therapy. We recorded toxicity, defined as dose interventions within 3 months, and progression-free survival (PFS). RESULTS: Among 44 evaluable patients, the geometric mean (GM) Ctrough was higher in patients with toxicity compared to patients without (17.4 versus 12.3 µg/L (p = 0.02)). The optimal cut-off value to predict toxicity was Ctrough > 19.2 µg/L. GM Ctrough of patients with and without progressive disease (PD) within 3 months was not significantly different (12.0 versus 15.2 µg/L (p = 0.118)). In 28 evaluable patients, PD within 3 months could best be predicted using the percentage decrease in peak standardized uptake value normalized by lean body mass of the lesion with highest FDG uptake (SULpeak high) at day 14. Patients with <11% versus >11% decrease in SULpeak high at day 14 had a median PFS of 90 days versus 411 days, respectively (p = 0.0013) and more frequently had PD within 3 months: 70 vs 11%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Our results show that everolimus toxicity is related to everolimus Ctrough. No relation was observed between everolimus exposure and treatment effectiveness. An early FDG-PET can identify patients at high risk of nonresponse. These results warrant further validation. Clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT01948960.


Subject(s)
Androstadienes/therapeutic use , Breast Neoplasms/drug therapy , Everolimus/therapeutic use , Aged , Androstadienes/pharmacology , Breast Neoplasms/pathology , Everolimus/pharmacology , Female , Humans , Middle Aged
13.
Eur Urol ; 74(3): 257-260, 2018 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29730017

ABSTRACT

Based on the high expression of carbonic anhydrase IX (CAIX) in 95% of clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC), the anti-CAIX monoclonal antibody girentuximab can be used for the detection of ccRCC. This clinical study explores the value of 89Zr-labeled girentuximab positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) imaging in diagnostic challenges regarding ccRCC. PET/CT imaging was performed 4 or 5 d after injection of 89Zr-girentuximab in patients with a primary renal mass (n=16) or a history of ccRCC (n=14). Scans were used for decision making (surgery/active surveillance) in case of indistinct renal masses. All resected PET-positive primary lesions proved to be ccRCC, while no lesion progression was seen in PET-negative masses. In patients suspected of recurrent/metastatic ccRCC, PET/CT with 89Zr-girentuximab was useful to confirm or exclude ccRCC, evaluate the extent of the disease, and differentiate from other cancers. In this group, 89Zr-girentuximab PET/CT resulted in a major change in clinical management in five patients (36%), while in three patients (21%) repeat biopsies could be avoided. We conclude that 89Zr-girentuximab PET/CT is a valuable diagnostic tool that can guide clinical decision making in case of diagnostic dilemmas concerning ccRCC suspicion. PATIENT SUMMARY: Positron emission tomography/computed tomography imaging with 89Zr-girentuximab can be a valuable diagnostic tool to identify clear cell renal cell carcinoma.


Subject(s)
Antibodies, Monoclonal/administration & dosage , Biomarkers, Tumor , Carcinoma, Renal Cell/diagnostic imaging , Kidney Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging , Positron Emission Tomography Computed Tomography , Radiopharmaceuticals/administration & dosage , Antigens, Neoplasm , Carbonic Anhydrase IX , Carcinoma, Renal Cell/enzymology , Carcinoma, Renal Cell/immunology , Carcinoma, Renal Cell/therapy , Clinical Decision-Making , Decision Support Techniques , Diagnosis, Differential , Humans , Kidney Neoplasms/enzymology , Kidney Neoplasms/immunology , Kidney Neoplasms/therapy , Nephrectomy , Patient Selection , Predictive Value of Tests , Watchful Waiting
14.
Br J Clin Pharmacol ; 83(10): 2195-2204, 2017 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28500677

ABSTRACT

AIM: Fixed dose oral tyrosine kinase inhibitors imatinib, sunitinib and pazopanib show a high interpatient variability in plasma exposure. A relationship between plasma exposure and treatment outcome has been established, which supports the rationale for dose optimization of these drugs. The aim of this study was to monitor how many patients reached adequate trough levels after therapeutic drug monitoring-based dose optimization in daily practice. METHODS: A cohort study was performed in patients treated with imatinib, sunitinib or pazopanib of whom follow-up drug levels were measured between August 2012 and April 2016. Patients' characteristics were collected by reviewing electronic patient records. Drug levels were measured using high-performance liquid chromatography coupled with tandem mass spectrometry and trough levels were estimated using a predefined algorithm. Dose interventions were proposed based on trough levels. RESULTS: In total, 396 trough levels were determined in 109 patients. Median sample frequency per patient was 3. During the first measurement only 38% of patients showed trough levels within the predefined target ranges despite standard dosing; 52% of the patients showed drug levels below and 10% above the target range. In 35 out of 41 patients (85%) dose interventions led to adequate trough levels. Eventually, 64% of the total cohort reached adequate trough levels. CONCLUSIONS: Dose optimization proved an effective tool to reach adequate trough levels in patients treated with imatinib, sunitinib and pazopanib. The percentage of patients with adequate trough levels increased from 38 to 64%. Therapeutic drug monitoring may add to the improvement of efficacy and reduction of toxicity and costs of these treatments.


Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Agents/pharmacokinetics , Drug Monitoring , Imatinib Mesylate/pharmacokinetics , Indoles/pharmacokinetics , Neoplasms/drug therapy , Protein Kinase Inhibitors/pharmacokinetics , Pyrimidines/pharmacokinetics , Pyrroles/pharmacokinetics , Sulfonamides/pharmacokinetics , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Antineoplastic Agents/therapeutic use , Child , Chromatography, High Pressure Liquid/methods , Feasibility Studies , Female , Humans , Imatinib Mesylate/therapeutic use , Indazoles , Indoles/therapeutic use , Male , Middle Aged , Protein Kinase Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Pyrimidines/therapeutic use , Pyrroles/therapeutic use , Retrospective Studies , Sulfonamides/therapeutic use , Sunitinib , Tandem Mass Spectrometry/methods , Treatment Outcome , Young Adult
15.
Acta Oncol ; 55(4): 444-8, 2016.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26959411

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Diarrhea is a frequently occurring adverse event during treatment with vascular endothelial growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors (VEGFR TKIs) and is mostly accompanied by abdominal cramps, flatulence and pyrosis. These complaints impair quality of life and lead to dose reductions and treatment interruptions. It is hypothesized that the diarrhea might be due to ischemia in bowel mucosa or inflammation, but the exact underlying pathophysiological mechanism of the diarrhea is still unknown. We aimed at exploring the mechanism for diarrhea in these patients by thorough endoscopic and histological assessment. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Endoscopies of the upper and lower gastrointestinal (GI) tract in 10 patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) who developed diarrhea during treatment with VEGFR TKIs were performed. RESULTS: Ten patients were included. The results showed endoscopically normal mucosa in the lower GI tract in seven patients without signs of ischemic colitis or inflammation. Gastroduodenoscopy revealed gastro-esophageal reflux disease, bulbitis and/or duodenitis with ulcers in eight patients. In three selected patients with bulbitis/duodenitis additional video capsule endoscopy was performed but revealed no additional intestinal abnormalities. CONCLUSION: We observed frequent mucosal abnormalities in the upper GI tract in VEGFR TKI-treated mRCC patients with diarrhea. Although these abnormalities provide insufficient explanation for the occurrence of diarrhea, we suggest to perform routine upper GI endoscopy in VEGFR TKI-treated patients with GI complaints.


Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Agents/adverse effects , Diarrhea/chemically induced , Endoscopy, Gastrointestinal/methods , Intestinal Mucosa/diagnostic imaging , Protein Kinase Inhibitors/adverse effects , Aged , Capsule Endoscopy/methods , Carcinoma, Renal Cell/drug therapy , Carcinoma, Renal Cell/pathology , Diarrhea/pathology , Female , Humans , Indoles/adverse effects , Intestinal Mucosa/drug effects , Intestinal Mucosa/pathology , Kidney Neoplasms/drug therapy , Kidney Neoplasms/pathology , Male , Middle Aged , Pyrroles/adverse effects , Receptors, Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor/antagonists & inhibitors , Sunitinib
16.
Eur Urol ; 69(5): 767-70, 2016 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26706103

ABSTRACT

UNLABELLED: Despite advances in the treatment of metastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC), there is still an unmet need in the treatment of this disease. A phase 2 radioimmunotherapy (RIT) trial with lutetium 177 ((177)Lu)-girentuximab was initiated to evaluate the efficacy of this approach. In this nonrandomized single-arm trial, patients with progressive metastatic ccRCC who met the inclusion criteria received 2405 MBq/m(2) of (177)Lu-girentuximab intravenously. In the absence of persistent toxicity and progressive disease, patients were eligible for retreatment after 3 mo with 75% of the previous activity dose. A total of 14 patients were included. After the first therapeutic infusion, eight patients (57%) had stable disease (SD) and one (7%) had a partial regression. The treatment was generally well tolerated but resulted in grade 3-4 myelotoxicity in most patients. After the second cycle, continued SD was observed in five of six patients, but none were eligible for retreatment due to prolonged thrombocytopenia. In conclusion, RIT with (177)Lu-girentuximab resulted in disease stabilization in 9 of 14 patients with progressive metastatic ccRCC, but myelotoxicity prevented retreatment in some patients. PATIENT SUMMARY: We investigated the efficacy of lutetium 177-girentuximab radioimmunotherapy in patients with metastatic kidney cancer. The treatment resulted in disease stabilization in 9 of 14 patients. The main toxicity was prolonged low blood cell counts. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02002312 (https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02002312).


Subject(s)
Antibodies, Monoclonal/therapeutic use , Antineoplastic Agents, Immunological/therapeutic use , Carcinoma, Renal Cell/radiotherapy , Kidney Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Lutetium/therapeutic use , Radioimmunotherapy , Radioisotopes/therapeutic use , Antibodies, Monoclonal/adverse effects , Antineoplastic Agents, Immunological/adverse effects , Carbonic Anhydrase IX/immunology , Carcinoma, Renal Cell/secondary , Disease-Free Survival , Humans , Kidney Neoplasms/pathology , Lutetium/adverse effects , Neutropenia/chemically induced , Non-Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , Radioimmunotherapy/adverse effects , Radioisotopes/adverse effects , Retreatment , Thrombocytopenia/chemically induced
17.
Anticancer Res ; 35(10): 5601-6, 2015 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26408732

ABSTRACT

AIM: To gain greater insight into the biological mechanisms occurring shortly after discontinuation of VEGFR TKIs treatment because of progressive disease (PD). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Sixteen patients with PD during treatment with sorafenib or sunitinib were randomized to either directly stop the VEGFR TKI or to continue for another two weeks. At baseline (i.e. at the moment of PD) and after two weeks FDG-PET/CT, functional-MRI and blood biomarkers of disease were evaluated. RESULTS: A statistically significant difference in median change from baseline to two weeks later in K(trans) and LDH levels was observed between patients who directly stopped versus those who continued treatment (1.6 s(-1) versus -1.1s(-1), p=0.03; -73.0 U/L versus 52.0 U/L, p=0.008; respectively). There were no further differences between groups. CONCLUSION: Two weeks after discontinuation of VEGFR TKIs in mRCC because of PD, a rise in K(trans) accompanied by a decrease in LDH indicates an increase in tumor vascularization. This implies that at the moment of PD the effect of VEGFR TKIs is not completely exhausted.


Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use , Biomarkers, Tumor/metabolism , Carcinoma, Renal Cell/secondary , Kidney Neoplasms/pathology , Multimodal Imaging/methods , Receptors, Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor/antagonists & inhibitors , Withholding Treatment , Aged , Carcinoma, Renal Cell/drug therapy , Carcinoma, Renal Cell/metabolism , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Indoles/administration & dosage , Kidney Neoplasms/drug therapy , Kidney Neoplasms/metabolism , Male , Middle Aged , Neoplasm Staging , Niacinamide/administration & dosage , Niacinamide/analogs & derivatives , Phenylurea Compounds/administration & dosage , Prognosis , Prospective Studies , Pyrroles/administration & dosage , Sorafenib , Sunitinib
18.
Hum Vaccin Immunother ; 11(7): 1634-40, 2015.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25996472

ABSTRACT

The aim of this study was to compare humoral and cellular immune responses to influenza vaccination in cancer survivors with and without severe symptoms of fatigue. Severely fatigued (n = 15) and non-fatigued (n = 12) disease-free cancer survivors were vaccinated against seasonal influenza. Humoral immunity was evaluated at baseline and post-vaccination by a hemagglutination inhibition assay. Cellular immunity was evaluated at baseline and post-vaccination by lymphocyte proliferation and activation assays. Regulatory T cells were measured at baseline by flow cytometry and heat-shock protein 90 alpha levels by ELISA. Comparable humoral immune responses were observed in fatigued and non-fatigued patients, both pre- and post-vaccination. At baseline, fatigued patients showed a significantly diminished cellular proliferation upon virus stimulation with strain H3N2 (1414 ± 1201 counts), and a trend in a similar direction with strain H1N1 (3025 ± 2339 counts), compared to non-fatigued patients (3099 ± 2401 and 5877 ± 4604 counts, respectively). The percentage of regulatory T lymphocytes was significantly increased (4.4 ± 2.1% versus 2.4 ± 0.8%) and significantly lower amounts of interleukin 2 were detected prior to vaccination in fatigued compared to non-fatigued patients (36.3 ± 44.3 pg/ml vs. 94.0 ± 45.4 pg/ml with strain H3N2 and 28.4 ± 44.0 pg/ml versus 74.5 ± 56.1 pg/ml with strain H1N1). Pre-vaccination heat-shock protein 90 alpha concentrations, post-vaccination cellular proliferation, and post-vaccination cytokine concentrations did not differ between both groups. In conclusion, influenza vaccination is favorable for severely fatigued cancer survivors and should be recommended when indicated. However, compared to non-fatigued cancer survivors, fatigued cancer survivors showed several significant differences in immunological reactivity at baseline, which warrants further investigation.


Subject(s)
Fatigue/immunology , Immunity, Cellular , Immunity, Humoral , Influenza Vaccines/immunology , Neoplasms/complications , Adolescent , Adult , Cytokines/immunology , Fatigue/etiology , Female , HSP90 Heat-Shock Proteins/blood , Hemagglutination Inhibition Tests , Humans , Influenza A Virus, H1N1 Subtype/immunology , Influenza A Virus, H3N2 Subtype/immunology , Influenza Vaccines/administration & dosage , Influenza, Human/prevention & control , Interleukin-2/immunology , Lymphocyte Activation , Male , Middle Aged , T-Lymphocytes, Regulatory/immunology , Young Adult
19.
Front Immunol ; 5: 191, 2014.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24834066

ABSTRACT

Prostate cancer (PCa) is the most common cancer in men and the second most common cause of cancer-related death in men. In recent years, novel therapeutic options for PCa have been developed and studied extensively in clinical trials. Sipuleucel-T is the first cell-based immunotherapeutic vaccine for treatment of cancer. This vaccine consists of autologous mononuclear cells stimulated and loaded with an immunostimulatory fusion protein containing the prostate tumor antigen prostate acid posphatase. The choice of antigen might be key for the efficiency of cell-based immunotherapy. Depending on the treatment strategy, target antigens should be immunogenic, abundantly expressed by tumor cells, and preferably functionally important for the tumor to prevent loss of antigen expression. Autoimmune responses have been reported against several antigens expressed in the prostate, indicating that PCa is a suitable target for immunotherapy. In this review, we will discuss PCa antigens that exhibit immunogenic features and/or have been targeted in immunotherapeutic settings with promising results, and we highlight the hurdles and opportunities for cancer immunotherapy.

20.
BMC Cancer ; 14: 219, 2014 Mar 24.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24661373

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Impairment of cognitive functioning has been reported in several studies in patients treated with chemotherapy. So far, no studies have been published on the effects of the vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGFR) inhibitors on cognitive functioning. We investigated the objective and subjective cognitive function of patients during treatment with VEGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (VEGFR TKI). METHODS: Three groups of participants, matched on age, sex and education, were enrolled; 1. metastatic renal cell cancer (mRCC) or GIST patients treated with sunitinib or sorafenib (VEGFR TKI patients n = 30); 2. patients with mRCC not receiving systemic treatment (patient controls n = 20); 3. healthy controls (n = 30). Sixteen neuropsychological tests examining the main cognitive domains (intelligence, memory, attention and concentration, executive functions and abstract reasoning) were administered by a neuropsychologist. Four questionnaires were used to assess subjective cognitive complaints, mood, fatigue and psychological wellbeing. RESULTS: No significant differences in mean age, sex distribution, education level or IQ were found between the three groups. Both patient groups performed significantly worse on the cognitive domains Learning & Memory and Executive Functions (Response Generation and Problem Solving) compared to healthy controls. However only the VEGFR TKI patients showed impairments on the Executive subdomain Response Generation. Effect sizes of cognitive dysfunction in patients using VEGFR TKI were larger on the domains Learning & Memory and Executive Functions, compared to patient controls. Both patients groups performed on the domain Attention & Concentration the same as the healthy controls. Longer duration of treatment on VEGFR TKI was associated with a worse score on Working Memory tasks. CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggest that treatment with VEGFR TKI has a negative impact on cognitive functioning, specifically on Learning & Memory, and Executive Functioning. We propose that patients who are treated with VEGFR TKI are monitored and informed for possible signs or symptoms associated with cognitive impairment. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01246843.


Subject(s)
Carcinoma, Renal Cell/physiopathology , Cognition Disorders/chemically induced , Indoles/adverse effects , Kidney Neoplasms/physiopathology , Niacinamide/analogs & derivatives , Phenylurea Compounds/adverse effects , Protein Kinase Inhibitors/adverse effects , Pyrroles/adverse effects , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Carcinoma, Renal Cell/drug therapy , Cognition/drug effects , Cognition Disorders/diagnosis , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Humans , Indoles/administration & dosage , Kidney Neoplasms/drug therapy , Male , Memory/drug effects , Middle Aged , Neoplasm Metastasis/drug therapy , Neoplasm Metastasis/physiopathology , Neuropsychological Tests , Niacinamide/administration & dosage , Niacinamide/adverse effects , Phenylurea Compounds/administration & dosage , Protein Kinase Inhibitors/administration & dosage , Pyrroles/administration & dosage , Sorafenib , Sunitinib
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...