A comparison of surgical outcomes among robotic cases performed with an employed surgical assist versus a second surgeon as the assist.

To examine whether utilizing an employed surgical first assistant or a physician as an assistant during gynecologic robotic cases affects surgical variables. A high volume gynecologic oncologist's robotic case data spanning fourteen years (2005-2018) was analyzed. We separated the cases based on the type of assistant used: either an employed surgical first assist or another physician. The assisting physicians were either members of the same practice or general gynecologists in the community. The two groups were compared for console time and estimated blood loss. We controlled for patient Body Mass Index (BMI), uterine weight, use of the fourth robotic arm, benign versus malignant pathology, and the surgeon's subjective estimate of the difficulty of the case using a conventional laparoscopic versus robotic approach. Cases with an employed surgical assist had a mean adjusted robotic console time that was 0.32 h (19.2 min) faster than cases with a physician as the assist (95% CI 0.26 h-0.37 h faster, p < 0.001). Cases with an employed surgical assist also had an estimated blood loss (EBL) that was 47.5 cc lower than cases with a physician assisting (95% CI 38.8 cc-56.3 cc lower EBL, p < 0.001). The use of an employed surgical assist was associated with a faster console time and lower blood loss compared to using an available physician even adjusting for confounding factors. This deserves further exploration, particularly in regards to complication rates, operating room efficiency, utilization of health care personnel, and cost.

Patterns of narcotic utilization in women undergoing hysterectomy for benign indications.

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether perioperative narcotic utilization at the time of hysterectomy has decreased since 2012. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: Academic university hospital. PATIENTS: Patients who underwent a laparoscopic hysterectomy for benign indications between January 2012 and December 2018. INTERVENTIONS: Perioperative narcotics administration. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: We identified 651 patients who underwent a hysterectomy for benign indications from 2012 to 2018. Of these, 377 surgeries were performed using robotic-assistance (58%) and the remainder (42%) were performed by conventional laparoscopy. Narcotic utilization declined significantly by year for both intra-operative and post-operative periods (both p<.001). The largest decline for intraoperative morphine milligram equivalents (MME) was between 2016 and 2017, while for post-operative MME, it was between 2012 and 2013. The pattern remained significant after adjusting for covariates. Intraoperative MME administration was correlated with postoperative MME use (Spearman r = 0.23, p<.001). Of the demographic variables only Body Mass Index was significantly associated with perioperative narcotic administration. CONCLUSION: Administration of opioids for intraoperative and postoperative pain after minimally invasive hysterectomy substantially decreased from 2012 to 2018. Intraoperative narcotic utilization was correlated with immediate postoperative narcotic consumption. Heightened awareness of opioid administration practices during and immediately following surgery is critically important to decreasing risk of chronic opioid dependence and providing the best possible care for the patients we serve.