ABSTRACT
The Biomarker Qualification Program was established at the Center for Drug Evaluation and Research (CDER), Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to expedite the integration of promising biomarkers across multiple drug development programs. The first set of biomarkers qualified in 2008 consisted of seven nonclinical safety biomarkers for the detection of acute drug-induced nephrotoxicity in rats, and included urinary kidney injury molecule-1 (KIM-1). This article discusses the use of KIM-1 in drug development and research before and after CDER's qualification of KIM-1. Use was determined by analyzing relevant documents identified by keyword searches using three databases: 1) an FDA internal database, Document Archiving, Reporting, and Regulatory Tracking System (DARRTS); 2) ClinicalTrials.gov; and 3) PubMed. The results indicate increased use of KIM-1 as a biomarker for detection of kidney injury in drug development programs reviewed by CDER, as well as in research following qualification.
Subject(s)
Acute Kidney Injury/urine , Biomarkers, Pharmacological/urine , Drug Approval/methods , Drug Development/methods , Hepatitis A Virus Cellular Receptor 1/metabolism , United States Food and Drug Administration , Acute Kidney Injury/chemically induced , Acute Kidney Injury/diagnosis , Animals , Bibliometrics , Clinical Trials as Topic , Databases, Factual , Humans , Observational Studies as Topic , Prognosis , PubMed , Risk Assessment , Time Factors , United States , UrinalysisABSTRACT
The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and National Organization for Rare Disease (NORD) convened a public workshop titled "Immune Responses to Enzyme Replacement Therapies: Role of Immune Tolerance Induction" to discuss the impact of anti-drug antibodies (ADAs) on efficacy and safety of enzyme replacement therapies (ERTs) intended to treat patients with lysosomal storage diseases (LSDs). Participants in the workshop included FDA staff, clinicians, scientists, patients, industry, and advocacy group representatives. The risks and benefits of implementing prophylactic immune tolerance induction (ITI) to reduce the potential clinical impact of antibody development were considered. Complications due to immune responses to ERT are being recognized with increasing experience and lengths of exposure to ERTs to treat several LSDs. Strategies to mitigate immune responses and to optimize therapies are needed. Discussions during the workshop resulted in the identification of knowledge gaps and future areas of research, as well as the following proposals from the participants: (1) systematic collection of longitudinal data on immunogenicity to better understand the impact of ADAs on long-term clinical outcomes; (2) development of disease-specific biomarkers and outcome measures to assess the effect of ADAs and ITI on efficacy and safety; (3) development of consistent approaches to ADA assays to allow comparisons of immunogenicity data across different products and disease groups, and to expedite reporting of results; (4) establishment of a system to widely share data on antibody titers following treatment with ERTs; (5) identification of components of the protein that are immunogenic so that triggers and components of the immune responses can be targeted in ITI; and (6) consideration of early ITI in patients who are at risk of developing clinically relevant ADA that have been demonstrated to worsen treatment outcomes.
