Choose Wisely: Surgical Selection of Candidates for Outpatient Anterior Cervical Surgery Based on Early Complications Among Inpatients.

BACKGROUND: Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) and cervical disc arthroplasty (CDA) are attractive targets for transition to the outpatient setting. We assessed the prevalence of rapid responses and major complications in the inpatient setting following 1 or 2-level ACDFs and CDAs. We evaluated factors that may place patients at greater risk for a rapid response or a postoperative complication. METHODS: This was an institutional review board-approved, retrospective cohort study of adults undergoing 1 or 2-level ACDF or CDA at 1 hospital over a 2-year period (2018 and 2019). Data on patient demographic characteristics, surgical procedures, and comorbidities were collected. Rapid response events were identified by hospital floor staff and involved acute changes in a patient's clinical condition. Complications were events that were life-threatening, required an intervention, or led to delayed hospital discharge. RESULTS: In this study, 1,040 patients were included: 888 underwent ACDF and 152 underwent CDA. Thirty-six patients (3.5%) experienced a rapid response event; 22% occurred >24 hours after extubation. Patients having a rapid response event had a significantly higher risk of developing a complication (risk ratio, 10; p < 0.01) and had a significantly longer hospital stay. Twenty-four patients (2.3%) experienced acute complications; 71% occurred >6 hours after extubation. Patients with a complication were older and more likely to be current or former smokers, have chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, have asthma, and have an American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score of >2. The length of the surgical procedure was significantly longer in patients who developed a complication. All patients who developed dysphagia had a surgical procedure involving C4-C5 or more cephalad. Patients with a rapid response event or complication were more commonly undergoing revision surgical procedures. CONCLUSIONS: Rapid response and complications are uncommon following 1 or 2-level ACDFs or CDAs but portend a longer hospital stay and increased morbidity. Revision surgical procedures place patients at higher risk for rapid responses and complications. Additionally, older patients, patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease or asthma, patients who are current or former smokers, and patients who have an ASA score of ≥3 are at increased risk for postoperative complications. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic Level III . See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Salvage procedures for pseudarthrosis after transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF)-anterior-only versus anterior-posterior surgery: a clinical and radiological outcome study.

A retrospective review was performed to analyze the radiographic and functional outcomes of two different surgeries to repair a pseudarthrosis following a transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) procedure. Although there are several published reports on the results of the TLIF procedure, there are no reports on how to salvage a failed TLIF. A total of 38 consecutive patients with failed TLIF procedures (at 50 levels) were repaired by either a direct anterior approach only (21 patients) or by a combined direct anterior approach coupled with a posterior exploration and pseudarthrosis repair (17 patients). The minimum follow-up after revision was 24 months. Clinical outcome was measured by Oswestry Disability Index, Roland Morris Questionnaire, SF-36, and the authors' own centers' satisfaction questionnaire in 17 of the 38 patients. The fusion rate for the anterior-alone group was 81% (17/21) and 88% (15/17) for the anterior-posterior group, not a statistically significant difference. The Oswestry scores averaged 56.4 for the anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF) group and 51.4 for the anterior-posterior fusion (APF) group. The Roland-Morris scores averaged 18.9 for the ALIF group and 20.0 for the APF group. The SF-36 showed similar outcomes in both groups. The authors' center's satisfaction questionnaire also showed similar results. The outcomes, both radiologic and functional, were equal in both groups. There was very little improvement in functional outcomes comparing prerepair to postrepair based on the authors' questionnaire.

Postoperative lumbar epidural hematoma: does size really matter?

STUDY DESIGN: Prospective clinical series with comparison to retrospectively collected data. OBJECTIVE: To compare direct measures of postoperative hematoma volume against a new measure of hematoma effect on the thecal sac: the critical ratio. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Asymptomatic epidural hematoma is common after lumbar surgery. Symptomatic patients demonstrate a typical progression from sharp peri-incisional pain to bilateral neurologic deficits. Little is known about what differentiates symptomatic and asymptomatic patients. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) measures of hematoma size or mass effect may correlate with postoperative symptoms. METHODS: The study population consisted of 3 patient groups evaluated by MRI 2 to 5 days after lumbar decompression with or without fusion. Fifty-seven consecutive prospectively enrolled patients comprised the asymptomatic group. No patient developed severe postoperative pain or neurologic deficit. Search of our institutional database identified 4978 surgical patients within the last 24 months. Seventeen developed new postoperative symptoms. The painful group included 12 patients with severe peri-incisional pain without neurologic deficit. The cauda equina (CE) group included 5 patients with postoperative CE syndrome. Digital imaging software was used to calculate thecal sac cross sectional area on pre- and postoperative MRI at each level, hematoma volume, volume per level decompressed, and critical ratio for each patient. Critical ratio was defined as the smallest ratio of postoperative to preoperative cross sectional area within the lumbar spine. RESULTS.: The critical ratio was the only measure found to differ significantly (P < 0.05) among all 3 groups. Mean critical ratios were asymptomatic (0.8), painful (0.5), and CE (0.2). CONCLUSION: The critical ratio correlates more closely with the presence or absence of postoperative symptoms than measures of hematoma volume, and is consistent with the clinical expectation that greater thecal sac compression may result in more severe symptoms. Few guidelines exist for postoperative lumbar MRI interpretation. The critical ratio is an important contribution.