Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 5 de 5
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Nat Commun ; 14(1): 5184, 2023 Aug 25.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37626044

ABSTRACT

Transmission electron microscopy is a pivotal instrument in materials and biological sciences due to its ability to provide local structural and spectroscopic information on a wide range of materials. However, the electron detectors used in scanning transmission electron microscopy are often unable to provide quantified information, that is the number of electrons impacting the detector, without exhaustive calibration and processing. This results in arbitrary signal values with slow response times that cannot be used for quantification or comparison to simulations. Here we demonstrate and optimise a hardware signal processing approach to augment electron detectors to perform single electron counting.

3.
Microsc Microanal ; 29(4): 1373-1379, 2023 Jul 25.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37488815

ABSTRACT

Fast frame rates are desirable in scanning transmission electron microscopy for a number of reasons: controlling electron beam dose, capturing in situ events, or reducing the appearance of scan distortions. While several strategies exist for increasing frame rates, many impact image quality or require investment in advanced scan hardware. Here, we present an interlaced imaging approach to achieve minimal loss of image quality with faster frame rates that can be implemented on many existing scan controllers. We further demonstrate that our interlacing approach provides the best possible strain precision for a given electron dose compared with other contemporary approaches.

4.
Microsc Microanal ; 29(4): 1402-1408, 2023 Jul 25.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37488817

ABSTRACT

With increasing interest in high-speed imaging, there should be an increased interest in the response times of our scanning transmission electron microscope detectors. Previous works have highlighted and contrasted the performance of various detectors for quantitative compositional or structural studies, but here, we shift the focus to detector temporal response, and the effect this has on captured images. The rise and decay times of eight detectors' single-electron response are reported, as well as measurements of their flatness, roundness, smoothness, and ellipticity. We develop and apply a methodology for incorporating the temporal detector response into simulations, showing that a loss of resolution is apparent in both the images and their Fourier transforms. We conclude that the solid-state detector outperforms the photomultiplier tube-based detectors in all areas bar a slightly less elliptical central hole and is likely the best detector to use for the majority of applications. However, using the tools introduced here, we encourage users to effectively evaluate which detector is most suitable for their experimental needs.

5.
Microsc Microanal ; 27(1): 99-108, 2021 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33334386

ABSTRACT

When characterizing beam-sensitive materials in the scanning transmission electron microscope (STEM), low-dose techniques are essential for the reliable observation of samples in their true state. A simple route to minimize both the total electron-dose and the dose-rate is to reduce the electron beam-current and/or raster the probe at higher speeds. At the limit of these settings, and with current detectors, the resulting images suffer from unacceptable artifacts, including signal-streaking, detector-afterglow, and poor signal-to-noise ratios (SNRs). In this article, we present an alternative approach to capture dark-field STEM images by pulse-counting individual electrons as they are scattered to the annular dark-field (ADF) detector. Digital images formed in this way are immune from analog artifacts of streaking or afterglow and allow clean, high-SNR images to be obtained even at low beam-currents. We present results from both a ThermoFisher FEI Titan G2 operated at 300 kV and a Nion UltraSTEM200 operated at 200 kV, and compare the images to conventional analog recordings. ADF data are compared with analog counterparts for each instrument, a digital detector-response scan is performed on the Titan, and the overall rastering efficiency is evaluated for various scanning parameters.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...