Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Can Fam Physician ; 59(2): e110-5, 2013 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23418252

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To determine which factors parents consider to be most important when pursuing elective circumcision procedures in newborn male children. DESIGN: Prospective survey. SETTING: Saskatoon, Sask. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 230 participants attending prenatal classes in the Saskatoon Health Region over a 3-month period. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Parents' plans to pursue circumcision, personal and family circumcision status, and factors influencing parents' decision making on the subject of elective circumcision. RESULTS: The reasons that parents most often gave for supporting male circumcision were hygiene (61.9%), prevention of infection or cancer (44.8%), and the father being circumcised (40.9%). The reasons most commonly reported by parents for not supporting circumcision were it not being medically necessary (32.0%), the father being uncircumcised (18.8%), and concerns about bleeding or infection (15.5%). Of all parents responding who were expecting children, 56.4% indicated they would consider pursuing elective circumcision if they had a son; 24.3% said they would not. In instances in which the father of the expected baby was circumcised, 81.9% of respondents were in favour of pursuing elective circumcision. When the father of the expected child was not circumcised, 14.9% were in favour of pursuing elective circumcision. Regression analysis showed that the relationship between the circumcision status of the father and support of elective circumcision was statistically significant (P < .001). Among couples in which the father was circumcised, 82.2% stated that circumcision by an experienced medical practitioner was a safe procedure for all boys, in contrast to 64.1% of couples in which the father of the expected child was not circumcised. When the expecting father was circumcised, no one responded that circumcision was an unsafe procedure, compared with 7.8% when the expecting father was not circumcised (P = .003). CONCLUSION: Despite new medical information and updated stances from various medical associations, newborn male circumcision rates continue to be heavily influenced by the circumcision status of the child's father.


Subject(s)
Circumcision, Male/psychology , Elective Surgical Procedures/psychology , Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice , Parents/psychology , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Chi-Square Distribution , Circumcision, Male/statistics & numerical data , Decision Making , Fathers , Female , Humans , Hygiene , Infant, Newborn , Infection Control , Male , Middle Aged , Neoplasms/prevention & control , Prospective Studies , Saskatchewan , Surveys and Questionnaires , Young Adult
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...