Ageing, hypertension and aortic valve stenosis - Understanding the series circuit using cardiac magnetic resonance and applanation tonometry.

BACKGROUND: Aortic stenosis (AS) is no longer considered to be a disease of fixed left ventricular (LV) afterload, but rather, functions as a series circuit, with important contributions from both the valve and vasculature. Patients with AS are typically elderly, with hypertension and a markedly remodelled aorta. The arterial component is sizeable, and yet, quantifying this to-date has been difficult to determine. We compared measurement of aortic pressure, flow and global LV load using a cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR)/applanation tonometry (AT) technique to uncouple ventriculo-arterial (VA) interactions. METHODS: 20 healthy elderly patients and 20 with AS underwent a CMR/AT protocol. CMR provided LV volume and aortic flow simultaneously with AT pressure acquisition. Aortic pressure was derived by transformation of the AT waveform. Systemic vascular resistance (SVR) and global LV load were determined as the relationship of pressure to flow in the frequency domain. Values from both cohorts were compared. RESULTS: AS patients were older (p â€‹< â€‹0.01) albeit with no significant difference in brachial or central aortic pressure. SVR (14228 vs 19906 â€‹dyne â€‹s.cm-3; p â€‹= â€‹0.02) and load (740 vs 946 â€‹dyne â€‹s.cm-3; p â€‹= â€‹0.02) were higher in patients with AS, whilst aortic peak flow velocity was lower (38 vs 58 â€‹cm/s; p â€‹< â€‹0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Quantification of aortic pressure, flow velocity and global LV load using a simultaneous CMR/AT technique is able to demonstrate the progressive effects of hypertension and aortic stiffening with advanced age and valvular stenosis. This technique may help to better identify future patients at risk of VA coupling mismatch after correction of AS.

Consensus guidelines for interventional cardiology services delivery during covid-19 pandemic in Australia and new Zealand.

The global coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic poses an unprecedented stress on healthcare systems internationally. These Health system-wide demands call for efficient utilisation of resources at this time in a fair, consistent, ethical and efficient manner would improve our ability to treat patients. Excellent co-operation between hospital units (especially intensive care unit [ICU], emergency department [ED] and cardiology) is critical in ensuring optimal patient outcomes. The purpose of this document is to provide practical guidelines for the effective use of interventional cardiology services in Australia and New Zealand. The document will be updated regularly as new evidence and knowledge is gained with time. Goals Considerations.

Long-term clinical follow-up of sirolimus-eluting (CYPHER) coronary stents in the treatment of instent restenosis in an unselected population.

Randomised trials in a highly selected patient population have demonstrated a dramatic reduction in the incidence of in-stent restenosis (ISR) following implantation of sirolimus-eluting (S-E) Cypher coronary stents compared with bare metal stents (BMS). The clinical outcome following implantation of S-E stents for treatment of complex, unselected BMS ISR is less well defined. The aim of this study was to assess the safety and efficacy of S-E coronary stents in the treatment of an unselected population of BMS ISR. All patients who received S-E stents for treatment of BMS ISR from May 1 2002-November 30 2003 at a single institution were entered into a prospectively collected database. In-hospital and long-term outcomes were collected. Sixty patients were identified who received S-E stents for the treatment of ISR. Four patients (6%) had undergone previous brachytherapy and 22% were diabetic. The most common target vessel was the left anterior descending coronary artery (40%), and 6% of lesions were in saphenous vein grafts (SVGs). The mean reference diameter was 2.67+/-0.52 (range 1.75-4.0) mm and the mean lesion length was 16.22+/-11.46 (range 3-68) mm. There were no procedural or in-hospital major adverse cardiac events (MACE). Long-term follow-up was available in 59 patients (98%). The 12-month MACE rate (cardiac death, myocardial infarction or target lesion revascularisation) was 12% with a 7% percutaneous coronary intervention rate and a 7% coronary artery bypass graft rate. There were no cardiac deaths and two non-cardiac deaths. Of the seven patients who had clinical restenosis at 12 months, four had previously failed brachytherapy and three involved SVGs. In conclusion, the use of S-E stents appears safe and efficacious in the treatment of an unselected population of BMS ISR with results comparing favourably with historical controls. Further randomised studies are needed to delineate the optimal management of this high risk group of patients.

Clinical follow-up of paclitaxel-eluting (TAXUS) stents for the treatment of saphenous vein graft disease.

BACKGROUND: Randomized trials in selected patient populations have demonstrated dramatic reductions in the incidence of in-stent restenosis (ISR) following implantation of paclitaxel-eluting (PE) coronary stents compared with bare metal stents in native coronary disease. The clinical outcome following implantation of PE stents for saphenous vein graft (SVG) stenosis is largely unknown. AIM: To assess the safety and efficacy of PE coronary stents for the treatment of SVG stenosis in an unselected population. METHODS: All patients who received PE stents for the treatment of SVG disease from May 1, 2003, to May 1, 2005, were entered into a prospectively collected database. Fifty-five patients were identified with 69 lesions. In-hospital and late major adverse cardiac events (MACE) including death, myocardial infarction (MI), and target lesion revascularization (TLR) were recorded as well as the rate of target vessel revascularization (TVR). RESULTS: Mean follow-up was 13 months with 54 of the 55 patients contacted. The number of stents implanted was 1.12 +/- 0.37 per lesion and 1.38 +/- 0.59 per patient. Clinically significant procedural MACE was 0%. The late MACE rate was 9% with a 2% clinically driven TLR, a 4% coronary artery bypass graft (CABG), and a 4% TVR rate. There were four deaths, two cardiac and two noncardiac. CONCLUSION: PE stents appear safe and effective in the treatment of SVG disease at a mean follow-up time of 13 months. Randomized studies are needed to further delineate the optimal management of this high-risk group.

Long-term follow-up of renal artery stenting in an Australian population.

BACKGROUND: Renal artery stenosis comprises both atherosclerotic renovascular disease and fibromuscular dysplasia, and may be associated with refractory hypertension, acute 'flash' pulmonary oedema and renal failure. The long-term clinical effects of renal artery stenting remain unclear. AIM: To assess the procedural and long-term safety and efficacy of renal artery stenting and its effect on blood pressure, antihypertensive medication usage and serum creatinine. METHODS: All patients referred for renal artery stenting at our institution between September 1997 and December 2003 were entered into a prospectively collected database. Systolic and diastolic blood pressure, number of antihypertensive medications, serum creatinine and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) were recorded. Patients were followed-up at least six months post-procedure. RESULTS: Eighty-nine patients underwent renal arteriography, with 110 stents deployed in 102 lesions. The procedural success rate was 99% with no procedural mortality. There were two cases of peri-procedural haemorrhage and one of sepsis. One patient developed renal and peripheral atheroemboli. FOLLOW-UP: Mean follow-up was 28 months (range 6 months-7 years). Eight patients were lost to follow-up. There were nine deaths with a mean time to death of 20.7 months (range 12 months-3 years). There was a highly statistically significant fall in systolic blood pressure (BP) from 161.7+/-29.5 mmHg pre-procedure to 138.7+/-17.9 mmHg at long-term follow-up post-procedure (p<0.0001). The clinical restenosis rate was 6.2%. Renal function and eGFR remained stable and there was a borderline significant decrease in the number of antihypertensive medications used (p=0.05). CONCLUSION: Renal artery stenting is safe and appears effective for the treatment of clinically significant renal artery stenosis.

Update on the use of stem cells for cardiac disease.

Major advances have recently been made in our understanding of stem cell biology, and in the application of stem cells to treat cardiac disease. Resident cardiac stem cells have now been described and the long-accepted paradigm of the adult mammalian heart as an organ without regenerative capacity has been questioned. Various stem-cell-based approaches for ameliorating cardiac disease have been shown to be beneficial in animal models and are now being trialled in humans, with several phase I clinical studies already completed. Although these clinical studies lacked adequate placebo controls, they have consistently shown promising results. If confirmed by larger phase II/III trials, it is possible that within a few years a powerful new therapeutic option may be available for the burgeoning number of patients suffering from myocardial ischaemia and/or other cardiac disorders.

Percutaneous carotid artery stenting: a strategy in evolution.

BACKGROUND: Carotid stenting was initially proposed as an alternative to surgical endarterectomy for selected high-risk patients. More recently, patients of standard surgical risk are being considered for percutaneous treatment of their carotid disease. AIMS: To describe the clinical outcomes of an initial consecutive cohort of patients treated by carotid stenting at one institution. METHODS: Between December 1997 and July 2003, 111 patients underwent stenting of 118 carotid arteries. Peri-procedural and long-term outcome data were collected. RESULTS: Most patients (>70%) were high-risk candidates for endarterectomy. Stents were successfully placed in 117/118 carotid arteries (99.2%). Distal protection devices were used in 43/118 (36.4%). The peri-procedural rate of death or disabling stroke was 3/118 (2.5%). Death or any stroke occurred in 11/118 (9.3%). However, only 7/118 (5.9%) procedures resulted in death or any persistent stroke (neurological deficit >1 week post-procedure). No myocardial infarction occurred. Median length of post-procedure hospitalization was 1 day. Long-term follow up was possible for 101 patients (91.0%) over a mean period of 27.1 months. The Kaplan-Meier estimate of survival free of ipsilateral stroke 36 and 66 months after carotid stenting was 77.0 +/- 9.5% and 68.2 +/- 15.1%, respectively. The estimated survival free of any stroke or stent failure was 70.9 +/- 10.7% and 60.7 +/- 17.4%, respectively. The majority of late deaths (7/11) were due to cardiac disease. CONCLUSION: We conclude that stenting of carotid stenoses is feasible, with a high procedural success rate and low complication rate. Carotid stenting should be considered the procedure of choice for high-risk patients.