Correction to: Association of invasion-promoting tenascin-C additional domains with breast cancers in young women.

After the publication of this work [1] an error was noticed in Fig. 6 (b). In the MCF-7/Vector columns, the same image was used accidentally for the 0 h and 24 h time points. Both images were taken from the 0 h time point.

Association of invasion-promoting tenascin-C additional domains with breast cancers in young women.

INTRODUCTION: Tenascin-C (TNC) is a large extracellular matrix glycoprotein that shows prominent stromal expression in many solid tumours. The profile of isoforms expressed differs between cancers and normal breast, with the two additional domains AD1 and AD2 considered to be tumour associated. The aim of the present study was to investigate expression of AD1 and AD2 in normal, benign and malignant breast tissue to determine their relationship with tumour characteristics and to perform in vitro functional assays to investigate the role of AD1 in tumour cell invasion and growth. METHODS: Expression of AD1 and AD2 was related to hypoxanthine phosphoribosyltransferase 1 as a housekeeping gene in breast tissue using quantitative RT-PCR, and the results were related to clinicopathological features of the tumours. Constructs overexpressing an AD1-containing isoform (TNC-14/AD1/16) were transiently transfected into breast carcinoma cell lines (MCF-7, T-47 D, ZR-75-1, MDA-MB-231 and GI-101) to assess the effect in vitro on invasion and growth. Statistical analysis was performed using a nonparametric Mann-Whitney test for comparison of clinicopathological features with levels of TNC expression and using Jonckheere-Terpstra trend analysis for association of expression with tumour grade. RESULTS: Quantitative RT-PCR detected AD1 and AD2 mRNA expression in 34.9% and 23.1% of 134 invasive breast carcinomas, respectively. AD1 mRNA was localised by in situ hybridisation to tumour epithelial cells, and more predominantly to myoepithelium around associated normal breast ducts. Although not tumour specific, AD1 and AD2 expression was significantly more frequent in carcinomas in younger women (age ≤40 years; P < 0.001) and AD1 expression was also associated with oestrogen receptor-negative and grade 3 tumours (P < 0.05). AD1 was found to be incorporated into a tumour-specific isoform, not detected in normal tissues. Overexpression of the TNC-14/AD1/16 isoform significantly enhanced tumour cell invasion (P < 0.01) and growth (P < 0.01) over base levels. CONCLUSIONS: Together these data suggest a highly significant association between AD-containing TNC isoforms and breast cancers in younger women (age ≤40 years), which may have important functional significance in vivo.

Breast cell invasive potential relates to the myoepithelial phenotype.

On the basis of marker profile, the majority of breast carcinomas are thought to be derived from luminal epithelial cells; however, a subgroup of tumours with more mesenchymal characteristics are associated with a worse prognosis. The hypothesis of our study is that some breast carcinomas exhibit myoepithelial rather than pure mesenchymal differentiation and that acquisition of myoepithelial characteristics confers an aggressive phenotype. Pure luminal epithelial cells and fibroblasts are readily distinguished by many markers but distinguishing between myoepithelial and fibroblast cell lineages is more problematic. The markers found to be most discriminating in our study were CK14, alpha6beta4 integrin and the myoepithelial-associated desmosomal cadherin DSg3. These markers were applied to a series of breast cell lines and purified normal breast cell populations and the expression profile related to in vitro invasive behaviour. This demonstrated that expression of one or more myoepithelial markers by tumour cells (MDA MB 231, MDA MB 468, MDA MB 436) was associated with a high invasive capacity compared with cells with a pure luminal phenotype (MCF-7, T47D, ZR75). To address why myoepithelial characteristics are associated with higher invasion, the in vitro behaviour of normal myoepithelial cells and two other nontumourigenic breast cell lines (MCF-10A, HBL100) was also analysed. Primary myoepithelial cells from normal human breast exhibit a high invasive capacity when grown at low density, suggesting that invasive capacity is part of the myoepithelial phenotype. In keeping with this, both nontumourigenic cell lines exhibited features of the myoepithelial phenotype and a high invasive capacity. These results suggest that tumours that exhibit a myoepithelial phenotype may be clinically more aggressive because a high invasive capacity is intrinsic to the myoepithelial phenotype.