Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Publication year range
1.
Am J Cardiol ; 56(4): 315-20, 1985 Aug 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-4025172

ABSTRACT

The antihypertensive mechanisms of single and combined therapy with a beta-adrenergic antagonist (propranolol) and a vasodilator (hydralazine) were investigated in 9 patients with moderately severe hypertension, who were receiving maintenance diuretic (hydrochlorothiazide) treatment. Hemodynamic and neuroendocrine responses were determined at rest and during lower body negative pressure, and dynamic and static exercise stress after the chronic administration of propranolol and hydralazine, given alone or in combination. All 3 drug regimens, each administered for at least 10 weeks, reduced blood pressure (p less than 0.05) compared with diuretic-only therapy in patients at rest, in both the supine and standing position, and during lower body negative pressure and dynamic exercise. There was a significant additive antihypertensive effect when propranolol and hydralazine were combined. Only combination therapy effectively lowered pressure during static exercise. The regimens produced divergent effects on the supine cardiac output: a decrease with propranolol (p less than 0.05), no change with combination therapy and an increase with hydralazine (p less than 0.05). Both hydralazine and combination therapy significantly reduced supine total peripheral resistance (p less than 0.05), whereas propranolol produced no change. All 3 drug treatments significantly reduced total peripheral resistance during upright rest and dynamic exercise (p less than 0.05), without changing cardiac output or maximal exercise capacity. During exercise, cardiac output was maintained in patients treated with propranolol and in those treated with combined therapy by increases in stroke volume (p less than 0.05).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)


Subject(s)
Hemodynamics/drug effects , Hydralazine/pharmacology , Hydrochlorothiazide/pharmacology , Hypertension/drug therapy , Neurosecretory Systems/drug effects , Propranolol/pharmacology , Adult , Drug Therapy, Combination , Exercise Test , Female , Humans , Hypertension/physiopathology , Hypotension, Orthostatic/physiopathology , Male , Middle Aged , Posture , Vascular Resistance/drug effects
2.
Circulation ; 67(2): 383-93, 1983 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-6129077

ABSTRACT

We investigated the relevance of the selective alpha 1-adrenergic receptor blockade produced by prazosin to its blood pressure-lowering efficacy in man. The hemodynamic and neuroendocrine responses to the acute and chronic oral administration of prazosin and phenoxybenzamine were compared in a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover study of 11 patients with essential hypertension. These responses were also evaluated during lower body negative pressure and dynamic bicycle exercise, which produce potent but diversified activation of the sympathetic nervous system. In the acute studies, arterial blood pressure decreased to similar levels with prazosin or phenoxybenzamine; however, hemodynamic and neuroendocrine responses differed both before and during sympathetic nervous system activation. Prazosin lowered arterial blood pressure by reducing total peripheral resistance (p less than 0.05). In contrast, phenoxybenzamine produced a modest reduction in cardiac output (8%, p less than 0.05) with little change in total peripheral resistance, forearm vascular resistance or forearm blood flow. Additionally, plasma norepinephrine concentration and heart rate rose to significantly higher levels with prazosin (p less than 0.02) than with phenoxybenzamine, a difference that was most evident with lower body negative pressure or dynamic exercise. Baroreceptor control of arterial pressure homeostasis was preserved with both agents, except during marked degrees of cardiovascular stress. With chronic therapy, the circulatory responses adapted to the alpha-adrenergic antagonists, and both drugs produced similar hemodynamic and neuroendocrine profiles. The differences with acute administration may be the result of a more rapid onset of action and a more marked degree of alpha-adrenergic blockage with prazosin than with phenoxybenzamine therapy, rather than to any difference in their alpha 1- and alpha 2-adrenergic receptor blocking properties. Moreover, the findings of the present study suggest that the prejunctional alpha 2-receptor, autoinhibitory to sympathetic neuronal norepinephrine release, is of no functional significance in patients with essential hypertension.


Subject(s)
Adrenergic alpha-Antagonists/administration & dosage , Hemodynamics , Hypertension/physiopathology , Norepinephrine/blood , Prazosin/administration & dosage , Quinazolines/administration & dosage , Adrenergic alpha-Antagonists/therapeutic use , Adult , Double-Blind Method , Female , Humans , Hypertension/blood , Hypertension/drug therapy , Lower Body Negative Pressure , Male , Middle Aged , Physical Exertion
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...