The complications of male hypogonadism: is it just a matter of low testosterone?

The history of diagnosing hypogonadism and hypotestosteronemia shows us the many steps that were necessary to achieve our current knowledge and the ability to improve these patients' well-being. Moreover, so far, criteria for diagnosing hypotestosteronemia varies according to the underlying condition, and according to the consensus or guideline adopted. Furthermore, besides the many signs and symptoms, there are several complications associated with low testosterone levels such as osteoporosis, metabolic alterations, as well as cardiovascular disorders. However, data are often conflicting regarding the severity, timing or even the real clinical relevance of these complications, although these studies often lack essential information such as gonadotropin levels or the underlying cause of hypogonadism. The present review focus on the complications of male hypogonadism according to the cause of testosterone deficiency, highlighting the lack of information found in many studies investigating its effects. We thereby stress the necessity to always perform a complete evaluation of the type of hypogonadism (including at least gonadotropins and secondary causes) when investigating the effects of low testosterone levels.

Genetic and phenotypic differences between sexes in congenital hypogonadotropic hypogonadism (CHH): Large cohort analysis from a single tertiary centre.

Background: Congenital hypogonadotropic hypogonadism (CHH) is a condition with a strong genetic background, caused by a deficient production, secretion, or action of gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH). Published data on CHH cohorts indicate a male predominance, although this is not supported by our current understandings. Aims: In order to unravel the possible causes or contributors to such epidemiological sex difference, the aim of our study is to investigate differences in genetic background and clinical presentation between males and females in a large cohort of CHH patients. Materials and methods: We enrolled 338 CHH patients with absent or arrested pubertal development, referred to our Center from 01/2016. Data collection included clinical assessment at diagnosis and genetic analysis performed by next generation sequencing (NGS), employing a custom panel of 28 candidate genes. Results: Among 338 patients 94 were female (F) and 244 male (M), with a ratio of 1:2.6. We found that 36.09% (122/338) of patients harbored potentially pathogenic rare genetic variants (RVs) with no significant differences between sexes; on the other hand, a significantly higher frequency of oligogenicity was observed in females (F 9,57% 9/94 vs M 3,69% 9/244, P = 0.034). The prevalence of non-reproductive phenotypic features was significantly higher (P = 0.01) in males (53/228, 23.2%) than in females (10/93, 10.8%): in particular, kidney abnormalities affected only male patients and midline defects had a significantly higher prevalence in males (P = 0.010). Finally, BMI SDS was -0.04 ± 1.09 in females and 0.69 ± 1.51 in males, with a statistically significant difference between groups (P = <0.001). Conclusion: Our data confirm the male predominance in CHH and identify some differences with regard to the clinical presentation between males and females that could indicate a variable expression of genetic rare variants and a dimorphic modulation of phenotype according to metabolic/behavioral factors, which will need to be substantiated and investigated by further studies.