Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 8 de 8
Filter
1.
Liver Int ; 40(1): 60-73, 2020 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31654608

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Chronic liver diseases (CLDs) are major health problems that require complex and costly treatments. Liver-specific clinical outcome indicators (COIs) able to assist both clinicians and administrators in improving the value of care are presently lacking. The Value-Based Medicine in Hepatology (VBMH) study aims to fill this gap, devising and testing a set of COIs for CLD, that could be easily collected during clinical practice. Here we report the COIs generated and recorded for patients with HBV or HCV infection at different stages of the disease. METHODS/RESULTS: In the first phase of VBMH study, COIs were identified, based on current international guidelines and literature, using a modified Delphi method and a RAND 9-point appropriateness scale. In the second phase, COIs were tested in an observational, longitudinal, prospective, multicentre study based in Lombardy, Italy. Eighteen COIs were identified for HBV and HCV patients. Patients with CLD secondary to HBV (547) or HCV (1391) were enrolled over an 18-month period and followed for a median of 4 years. The estimation of the proposed COIs was feasible in the real-word clinical practice and COI values compared well with literature data. Further, the COIs were able to capture the impact of new effective treatments like direct-acting antivirals (DAAs) in the clinical practice. CONCLUSIONS: The COIs efficiently measured clinical outcomes at different stages of CLDs. While specific clinical practice settings and related healthcare systems may modify their implementation, these indicators will represent an important component of the tools for a value-based approach in hepatology and will positively affect care delivery.


Subject(s)
Antiviral Agents/therapeutic use , Hepatitis B, Chronic/drug therapy , Hepatitis C, Chronic/drug therapy , Quality Indicators, Health Care , Aged , Carcinoma, Hepatocellular/epidemiology , Female , Gastroenterology/standards , Hepatitis B, Chronic/complications , Hepatitis C, Chronic/complications , Humans , Italy/epidemiology , Liver Cirrhosis/epidemiology , Liver Neoplasms/epidemiology , Longitudinal Studies , Male , Middle Aged , Prospective Studies , Survival Analysis , Treatment Outcome , Value-Based Health Insurance
2.
Biochim Biophys Acta Mol Basis Dis ; 1864(4 Pt B): 1415-1422, 2018 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28844954

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Autoimmune hepatitis, primary biliary cholangitis, and primary sclerosing cholangitis represent the three major autoimmune liver diseases (AILDs). Their management is highly specialized, requires a multidisciplinary approach and often relies on expensive, orphan drugs. Unfortunately, their treatment is often unsatisfactory, and the care pathway heterogeneous across different centers. Disease-specific clinical outcome indicators (COIs) able to evaluate the whole cycle of care are needed to assist both clinicians and administrators in improving quality and value of care. Aim of our study was to generate a set of COIs for the three AILDs. We then prospectively validated these indicators based on a series of consecutive patients recruited at three tertiary clinical centers in Lombardy, Italy. METHODS: In phase I using a Delphi method and a RAND 9-point appropriateness scale a set of COIs was generated. In phase II the indicators were applied in a real-life dataset. RESULTS: Two-hundred fourteen patients were enrolled and followed-up for a median time of 54months and the above COIs were recorded using a web-based electronic medical record program. The COIs were easy to collect in the clinical practice environment and their values compared well with the available natural history studies. CONCLUSIONS: We have generated a comprehensive set of COIs which sequentially capture different clinical outcome of the three AILDs explored. These indicators represent a critical tool to implement a value-based approach to patients with these conditions, to monitor, compare and improve quality through benchmarking of clinical performance and to assess the significance of novel drugs and technologies. This article is part of a Special Issue entitled: Cholangiocytes in Health and Diseaseedited by Jesus Banales, Marco Marzioni, Nicholas LaRusso and Peter Jansen.


Subject(s)
Autoimmune Diseases/therapy , Cholangitis, Sclerosing/therapy , Hepatitis, Autoimmune/therapy , Outcome Assessment, Health Care/methods , Quality Indicators, Health Care , Adult , Aged , Autoimmune Diseases/epidemiology , Cholangitis, Sclerosing/epidemiology , Critical Pathways/organization & administration , Delphi Technique , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Hepatitis, Autoimmune/epidemiology , Humans , Incidence , Italy/epidemiology , Male , Middle Aged , Prospective Studies , Survival Analysis , Tertiary Care Centers/statistics & numerical data
3.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev ; (5): CD004678, 2010 May 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20464733

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: This is an updated Cochrane review of the previous version published (Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2004 , Issue 1 . Art. No.: CD004678. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD004678)Previous studies have shown that glatiramer acetate (Copaxone (R)), a synthetic amino acid polymer is effective in experimental allergic encephalomyelitis (EAE), and improve the outcome of patients with multiple sclerosis (MS). OBJECTIVES: To verify the clinical efficacy of glatiramer acetate in the treatment of MS patients with relapsing remitting (RR) and progressive (P) course. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched the Cochrane MS Group Trials Register (26 March 2009), the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (The Cochrane Library, Issue 1, 2009), MEDLINE (PubMed) (January 1966 to 26 March 2009), EMBASE (January 1988 to 26 March 2009) and hand searching of symposia reports (1990-2009). SELECTION CRITERIA: All randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing glatiramer acetate and placebo in patients with definite MS, whatever the administration schedule and disease course, were eligible for this review. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Both patients with RR and P MS were analysed. Study protocols were comparable across trials. No major flaws were found in methodological quality. However, efficacy of blinding should be balanced against side effects, including injection-site reactions. MAIN RESULTS: Among 409 retrieved references, we identified 16 RCTs; six of them, published between 1987 and 2007, met the selection criteria and were included in this review. Five hundred and forty RR patients and 1049 PMS contributed to the analysis. In RR MS, a decrease in the mean EDSS score (-0.33 and -0.45), was found respectively at 2 years and 35 months without any significant effect on sustained disease progression. The reduction of mean number of relapse was evident at 1 year (-0.35 ) 2 years (-0.51 ) and 35 months (-0.64), but significant studies ' heterogeneity was found. The number of hospitalisations and steroid courses were significantly reduced. No benefit was shown in P MS patients. No major toxicity was found. The most common systemic adverse event was a transient and self-limiting patterned reaction of flushing, chest tightness, sweating, palpitations, anxiety. Local injection-site reactions were observed in up to a half of patients treated with glatiramer acetate, thus making a blind assessment of outcomes questionable. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Glatiramer acetate did show a partial efficacy in RR MS in term of relapse -related clinical outcomes, without any significant effect on clinical progression of disease measured as sustained disability. The drug is not effective in progressive MS patients.


Subject(s)
Immunosuppressive Agents/therapeutic use , Multiple Sclerosis, Chronic Progressive/drug therapy , Multiple Sclerosis, Relapsing-Remitting/drug therapy , Peptides/therapeutic use , Disease Progression , Glatiramer Acetate , Humans , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , Recurrence , Treatment Outcome
6.
World Hosp Health Serv ; 42(1): 30-3, 2006.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16669374

ABSTRACT

After the 1993 healthcare reform, all public hospitals in Italy were changed into public firms. The increasing commitment to pursue efficiency has introduced the need for a managerial responsibility in healthcare organizations. However, activities and resource use in hospitals driven by professionals and senior management often has a limited insight on business processes. We developed a three-dimensional evaluation system based on: (a) personal support to the overall team output, (b) assessment of organizational behavour and (c) individual goals setting (MBO). According to the position held, personal goals are negotiated with direct reports across three domains: managerial attitude, professional skills and organizational behaviours.


Subject(s)
Motivation , Personnel Administration, Hospital/methods , Personnel, Hospital/psychology , Hospitals, Public , Humans , Italy
8.
Lancet ; 361(9357): 545-52, 2003 Feb 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12598138

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Recombinant interferons have been approved by many national regulatory agencies for treatment of relapsing remitting multiple sclerosis, but widespread discussion continues about their true effectiveness, benefits, side-effects, and costs. METHODS: With the Cochrane Collaboration methodology, we reviewed all published, randomised, placebo-controlled trials of recombinant interferons undertaken in patients with relapsing remitting multiple sclerosis between 1993 and 2002. Our primary aim was to find out whether recombinant interferons reduced the number of patients who had clinical exacerbations and disease progression, compared with placebo. FINDINGS: The seven trials that met our criteria included 1215 randomised patients: data from 667 (55%) were available for analysis at 1 year's and from 919 (76%) at 2 years' follow-up. Interferon seemed to reduce the number of patients who had exacerbations during the first year of treatment (relative risk 0.73, 95% CI 0.54-0.99), but results at 2 years' follow-up were not robust and were difficult to interpret because of the many dropouts. Although the number of patients who had exacerbations (0.81, 0.74-0.89) or progressed (0.70, 0.55-0.88) during the first 2 years fell significantly in the protocol analysis, results were inconclusive after sensitivity analyses for exacerbations (1.11, 0.73-1.68) and disease progression (1.31, 0.60-2.89). Data were insufficient to establish whether steroid use and admissions to hospital were reduced in the interferon group. Similarly, MRI outcome data could not be analysed quantitatively. Side-effects were common, and acute toxic effects adversely affected quality of life. INTERPRETATION: Recombinant interferons slightly reduce the number of patients who have exacerbations during first year of treatment. Their clinical effect beyond 1 year is uncertain and new trials are needed to assess their long-term effectiveness and side-effects.


Subject(s)
Interferons/therapeutic use , Multiple Sclerosis/drug therapy , Adult , Humans , Interferons/adverse effects , Middle Aged , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , Recombinant Proteins , Recurrence , Treatment Outcome
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...