Improving Gender-Affirming Surgery Terminology: A Multicenter Patient Survey.

BACKGROUND: To promote patient safety and build trust, plastic surgeons must use patient-centered language when discussing gender-affirming surgery. However, the existing terminology has not been evaluated from a patient perspective. This study sought to understand how gender-affirming surgery patients from 3 US geographic regions perceive common terminology. METHODS: An anonymous, 24-item electronic survey was distributed to gender-affirming surgery patients seen in Tennessee, Colorado, and California. After institutional review board exemption, the survey instrument was pretested and piloted with gender-affirming surgery patients. Internal consistency was assessed by computation of Cronbach α (0.87). RESULTS: A total of 306 participants completed the survey: 68 from a Tennessee academic center (response rate, 56%), 131 from a California private practice (response rate, 8%), and 107 from a Colorado academic center (response rate, 53%). A greater proportion of respondents felt the terms "top surgery" and "bottom surgery" were appropriate (83% and 82%, respectively) relative to "chest surgery" and "genital surgery" (41% and 30%, respectively). More respondents favored the phrase "gender-affirming surgery" than "gender-confirming surgery" (86% vs 67%). Nearly half (43%) perceived the phrase "sex reassignment surgery" as inappropriate. Most respondents (80%) preferred their surgeon ask for their pronouns. CONCLUSIONS: Optimizing communication is an actionable way for plastic surgeons to improve the healthcare experiences of gender-affirming surgery patients. "Top surgery" and "bottom surgery" are favored terms, and "gender-affirming surgery" is the preferred name for this discipline. Language preferences should be openly discussed with each patient to ensure professional communication.

Urinary Bladder Matrix Grafting Versus Flap Coverage for Acute or Infected Wound Defects in Patients With Orthopaedic Trauma.

OBJECTIVES: Urinary bladder matrix (UBM) grafting of acute or infected wound defects has been reported to be successful in small case series. The purpose of this study was to compare the outcomes of UBM grafting with flap coverage. DESIGN: This is a retrospective comparative study. SETTING: Level-1 trauma center. PATIENTS: Orthopaedic trauma patients with wound defects not amenable to primary closure or skin grafting. INTERVENTION: Wound coverage with UBM grafting (n = 26) by orthopaedic trauma surgeons versus flap coverage (n = 26) by microvascular-trained plastic surgeons. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Primary wound coverage success, complications, returns to the operating room, hospital length of stay, and time to wound healing. RESULTS: The UBM group was more likely to have an American Society of Anesthesiologist class ≥3 (58% vs. 23%, P = 0.02), a foot/ankle wound (77% vs. 12%, P < 0.001), an infected wound defect (81% vs. 50%, P = 0.03), and smaller defects (21 vs. 100 cm 2 , P = 0.02). UBM grafting resulted in a longer time to wound healing (6 vs. 2 months, P = 0.002) and a shorter hospital length of stay (2 vs. 14 days, P < 0.0001). UBM and flap groups had similarly high rates of failure of primary wound coverage (31% vs. 31%; P = 1.0), complications (46% vs. 62%, P = 0.4), and returns to the operating room (46% vs. 65%; P = 0.2). All 3 acute traumatic wounds undergoing UBM grafting concurrently with fracture fixation experienced graft failure and osteomyelitis. CONCLUSION: UBM grafting is an effective alternative to flap coverage for small traumatic or infected wounds but should be avoided in acute traumatic wounds undergoing fracture fixation. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Alveolar Bone Graft Timing in Patients With Cleft Lip & Palate.

ABSTRACT: Cleft lip with or without cleft palate (CLP) is the most common craniofacial condition. Alveolar clefts are present in approximately 75% of patients with a cleft lip or CLP and often do not have sufficient support of surrounding teeth. Alveolar bone graft is commonly performed to reconstruct alveolar ridge in patient with osseous defects. Objective of this review is to critically analyze the literature to provide recommendations on appropriate timing for orthodontic preparation and surgical correction of alveolar clefts in the setting of unilateral or bilateral CLP. Search of PubMed database, MEDLINE, and EMBASE was performed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines, 15 studies were included. Majority of studies used chronological age to classify patients versus dental age. Most studies reported orthodontic treatment concomitant with surgery (12/15; 80.0%), and used orthodontics before alveolar bone grafting (8/12; 66.7%). No consensus on the best method to evaluate the success of alveolar bone grafting. Alveolar bone grafting with pre- and post-operative orthodontics is currently the standard of care for treatment of alveolar defects in patients with CLP. Authors recommend grafting during early mixed dentition phase, just before the eruption of the permanent central incisors, typically between 6 and 8 years old. Preoperative orthodontics for appropriate incisor alignment around cleft, and may be resumed 6 months postoperative.

Abdominal Etching: Surgical Technique and Outcomes.

BACKGROUND: The ideal body is characterized by a muscular physique and defined anterior abdominal wall. Despite diet and exercise, many are unable to achieve this desired result. Liposuction with abdominal etching is used to achieve high-definition abdominal aesthetics. The etching technique is performed with liposuction in a superficial plane, to create indentures consistent with "six-pack abs," or definition of vertical abdominal lines. METHODS: The authors' abdominal etching preoperative markings, surgical technique, and postoperative care are discussed. The surgeons' experience with abdominal etching in 50 consecutive patients is reviewed, including rate of complications and patient satisfaction. RESULTS: The average patient age was 36.4 years. We had an almost equal number of men (n = 26) and women (n = 24), with an average body mass index of 26.7 kg/m. The average blood loss was 275 ml, the average tumescence was 6 liters, and the average lipoaspirate was 5 liters. There were no major complications such as fat embolus, deep venous thrombosis, or intraabdominal injury. The most common minor postoperative complications were contour irregularities (12 percent), seromas (10 percent), and hyperpigmentation (2 percent). The majority of patients were satisfied (98 percent). The average length of postoperative follow-up was 27 months. CONCLUSIONS: Abdominal etching is a safe and effective method of creating a defined anterior abdominal wall for patients who desire the muscular definition of vertical abdominal lines. Almost all of our patients reviewed were satisfied with this procedure, maintained long-term results, and had an acceptable rate of complications. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, IV.

Iatrogenic Conchal Defect Secondary to Auricular Cartilage Graft.

BACKGROUND: Cleft lip and palate are the most common craniofacial congenital malformations. Timing of the nasal repair remains somewhat controversial. Some authors perform a combined nasal and lip repair in infancy while others advocate for a staged repair with the nasal component occurring later in childhood. Frequently, secondary repair is needed to address residual nasal deformities in early adulthood. Conchal cartilage has become increasingly popular as a source of cartilage for secondary reconstruction. Donor site morbidities include hematoma formation, scar formation, and wound healing complications. To the best of the authors' knowledge, there is 1 previous report of a full through-and-through conchal defect as a complication of auricular cartilage graft harvesting. The authors report an infrequently described iatrogenic conchal defect due to cartilage harvesting managed with a single-stage reconstruction using bookend flaps. METHODS: A 19-year-old female with a history of unilateral cleft lip and palate repair underwent secondary rhinoplasty using conchal cartilage. A bolster dressing was applied to the conchal harvest site. The patient was unable to attend her postoperative clinic visit and was eventually seen 2 months postoperatively with the bolster still in place. A full-thickness conchal defect was present when the bolster was removed. RESULTS: A pressure dressing such as a bolster is commonly used to prevent hematoma formation after conchal cartilage graft harvesting. This is routinely removed during the initial postoperative visit. Prolonged placement can result in donor site complications such as a full-thickness conchal defect. CONCLUSION: A functional and aesthetic reconstruction of a full-thickness iatrogenic conchal defect was achieved with excellent results using a local posterior flap, and 2 anteriorly based bookend flaps for closure. To the best of the authors' knowledge, this report is the first to describe a single-stage reconstruction of an iatrogenic defect in the concha as a complication of conchal cartilage harvesting.

Panniculectomy Outcomes in Patients with End-Stage Renal Disease in Preparation for Renal Transplant.

PURPOSE: End-stage renal disease (ESRD) is associated with increased cardiovascular risk factors, electrolyte imbalances, and iron deficiency anemia. These factors may increase the risk of adverse outcomes in patients undergoing panniculectomy. There is a paucity of data regarding outcomes in patients with ESRD undergoing panniculectomy. The purpose of this study is to investigate whether ESRD is associated with increased rate of complications following a panniculectomy. METHOD: The Nationwide Inpatient Sample database (2006-2011) was used to identify patients who underwent a panniculectomy. Among this cohort, patients diagnosed with end-stage renal disease were identified. Patients excluded from the study were emergency admissions, pregnant women, patients less than 18 years old, and patients with concurrent nephrectomy or kidney transplants. Demographic factors, comorbidities, and postoperative complications were evaluated. Chi-squared and risk-adjusted multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to determine whether end-stage renal disease was associated with increased rate of postoperative complications. RESULTS: A total of 34,779 panniculectomies were performed during the study period. Of these, 613 (1.8%) were diagnosed with ESRD. Patients with ESRD were older (mean age 58.9 vs. 49.3, p < 0.01) and more likely to have Medicare (63.5 vs. 18.4%, p < 0.01). They had higher rates of comorbidities, including diabetes, hypertension, congestive heart failure, chronic lung disease, chronic anemia, liver disease, peripheral artery disease, obesity, and coagulopathies (p < 0.01). The procedure was more likely to occur at a large, teaching hospital (p < 0.01). Postoperatively, patients with ESRD had a higher rate of death (3.3 vs. 0.2%, p < 0.01), wound complications (10.6 vs. 6.2%, p < 0.01), venous thromboembolism (4.9 vs. 0.8%, p < 0.01), blood transfusions (25.3% vs. 7.0%, p < 0.01), non-renal major medical complications (40.0% vs. 8.4%), and longer hospital stay (9.2 vs. 3.8 days, p < 0.01). Multivariate logistic regression analysis controlling for age, race, sex, hospital location/teaching hospital, payer, and all comorbidities demonstrated that ESRD was independently associated with increased venous thromboembolisms (OR 2.38, 95% CI 1.48-3.83) and non-renal major medical complications (OR 1.51, 95% CI 1.19-1.91). ESRD was not independently associated with increased rate of wound complications or transfusions. CONCLUSION: Patients with ESRD are at increased risk of VTE and non-renal major medical complications following panniculectomy. Moreover, patients with ESRD have longer hospital stays and higher rates of mortality. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IV: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

Abdominal Contouring Outcomes in Class III Obesity: Analysis of the ACS-NSQIP Database.

BACKGROUND: Obesity may increase the risk of complications following abdominal contouring. The aim of this study is to evaluate panniculectomy outcomes in patients with class III obesity (BMI > 40 kg/m2). METHODS: The American College of Surgeon's National Surgical Quality Improvement Program ACS-NSQIP (2010-2014) was used to identify patients who underwent panniculectomy. Class III obesity patients were identified. Demographics, comorbidities and postoperative outcomes were evaluated. Risk-adjusted multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to assess impact of class III obesity on panniculectomy outcomes. RESULTS: A total of 4497 panniculectomies were identified. Of these, 545 (12.1%) were performed in patients with class III obesity. This group was older (mean age 50.3 vs. 45.9, p < 0.01) with a higher proportion of men (23.4 vs. 12.4%, p < 0.01). Class III obesity group also had higher rates of comorbidities (p < 0.01). Postoperatively, class III obesity patients experienced much higher rates of wound complications (17.8 vs. 6.8%), sepsis (3.3 vs. 0.8%), venous thromboembolism (1.5 vs. 0.7%) and medical complications (6.4 vs. 1.8%), p < 0.05. Additionally, this group had higher rates of unplanned reoperation (9.2 vs. 3.7%) and 30-day readmissions (3.5 vs. 1.0%), p < 0.01. On risk-adjusted multivariate regression analyses, class III obesity was independently associated with increased risk of wound complications (OR 2.22, p < 0.01), sepsis (OR 3.53, p < 0.01), medical adverse events (OR 1.98, p < 0.05), unplanned reoperation (OR 1.62, p < 0.05) and 30-day readmission (OR 2.30, p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Class III obesity patients are at significantly increased risk of adverse outcomes following abdominal contouring. Plastic surgeons should consider these risks for counseling and preoperative risk optimization. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IV: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

Shake It Off: A Randomized Pilot Study of the Effect of Whole Body Vibration on Pain in Healing Burn Wounds.

Whole body vibration (WBV) has been shown to improve strength in extremities with healed burn wounds. We hypothesize that WBV reduces pain during rehabilitation compared to standard therapy alone. Patients with ≥1% TBSA burn to one or more extremities from October 2014 to December 2015 were randomized to vibration (VIBE) or control. Each burned extremity was tested separately within the assigned group. Patients underwent one to three therapy sessions (S1, S2, S3) consisting of five upper and/or lower extremity exercises with or without WBV. Pain was assessed pre-, mid-, and postsession on a scale of 1 to 10. Mean pain scores at S1 to S3 were compared between groups with paired samples t-tests. An independent t-test was used to compare differences in pain scores between groups. Continuous variables were compared using a t-test or Mann-Whitney U test, and categorical variables were compared using a χ or Fisher's exact test, as appropriate. Forty-eight randomized test extremities (VIBE = 26, control = 22) were analyzed from a total of 31 subjects. There were no significant differences between groups in age, gender, overall TBSA, TBSA in the test extremity, pain medication use before therapy session, or skin grafting before therapy session. At S1, S2, and S3, there was a statistically significant decrease in mid- and postsession pain compared to presession pain in VIBE vs controls. Exposure to WBV decreased pain during and after physical therapy. This modality may be applicable to a variety of soft tissue injuries and warrants additional investigation.

Admission Hyperglycemia Predicts Infectious Complications After Burns.

Inflammation and hypermetabolism post burn predisposes to hyperglycemia and insulin resistance. The authors hypothesize that admission hyperglycemia predicts infectious outcomes. A retrospective review of all patients greater than 20 years of age admitted for initial burn management from January 2008 to December 2013 was conducted. Nonthermal injuries, transfers, and those without admission glucose or histories were excluded. Hyperglycemia was defined as admission glucose ≥150 mg/dl. Patients were grouped as follows: euglycemic without diabetes (control), euglycemic with diabetes (-H+D), hyperglycemic without diabetes (+H-D), and hyperglycemic with diabetes (+H+D). Outcomes included infection, mortality, length of stay, and disposition. Comparisons were made using Fisher's exact test and multiple logistic regression. A total of 411 patients were analyzed. No significant differences between any of the groups and controls were noted in race, inhalation injury, or obesity. All three groups had higher mortality compared with controls. Longer hospital stays were noted only in +H-D. +H-D and +H+D were less likely to be discharged home than controls. +H-D had higher rates of bacteremia, +H-D and +H+D had higher rates of pneumonia, and -H+D and +H-D had higher rates of urinary tract infection. Regression for infection and mortality outcomes with TBSA, age, diabetes, hyperglycemia, obesity, race, gender, and inhalation injury as covariates was performed. Hyperglycemia was the only independent predictor of bacteremia (area under curve [AUC] = 0.736). Hyperglycemia was also a predictor of pneumonia and urinary tract infection (AUC = 0.766 and 0.802, respectively). The only independent predictors of mortality were age, TBSA, and inhalation injury (AUC = 0.892). Acute glucose dysregulation may be more important than diabetes in predicting infectious outcomes after burns. Therefore, admission glucose may have prognostic value.