Management of fast breathing pneumonia in young infants aged 7 to 59 days by community level health workers: protocol for a multi-centre cluster randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: WHO does not recommend community-level health workers (CLHWs) using integrated community case management (iCCM) to treat 7-59 days old infants with fast breathing with oral amoxicillin, whereas World Health Organization (WHO) integrated management of childhood illness (IMCI) recommends it. We want to collect evidence to help harmonization of both protocols. METHODS: A cluster, randomized, open-label trial will be conducted in Africa and Asia (Ethiopia, Malawi, Bangladesh and India) using a common protocol with the same study design, inclusion criteria, intervention, comparison, and outcomes to contribute to the overall sample size. This trial will also identify hypoxaemia in young infants with fast breathing. CLHWs will assess infants for fast breathing, which will be confirmed by a study supervisor. Enrolled infants in the intervention clusters will be treated with oral amoxicillin, whereas in the control clusters they will be managed as per existing iCCM protocol. An independent outcome assessor will assess all enrolled infants on days 6 and 14 of enrolment for the study outcomes in both intervention and control clusters. Primary outcome will be clinical treatment failure by day 6. This trial will obtain approval from the WHO and site institutional ethics committees. CONCLUSIONS: If the research shows that CLHWs can effectively and safely treat fast breathing pneumonia in 7-59 days old young infants, it will increase access to pneumonia treatment substantially for infants living in communities with poor access to health facilities. Additionally, this evidence will contribute towards the review of the current iCCM protocol and its harmonization with IMCI protocol. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The trial is registered at AZNCTR International Trial Registry as ACTRN12617000857303.

Operationalising integrated community case management of childhood illnesses by community health workers in rural Haryana.

AIM: To conduct implementation research in integrated community case management (ICCM) of childhood pneumonia, diarrhoea and fever by promoting accredited social health activists as treatment providers and generate lessons for upscaling this approach. METHODS: In this one-sample study, 49 Accredited Social Health Activists were trained in ICCM. Community awareness and demand generation activities undertaken included announcements, pamphlets and posters. Supplies of medicines and supervision of activists were maintained throughout the 10-month implementation period. Three cross-sectional surveys were conducted in households with children aged 2-59 months for documenting two-week prevalence of illnesses and care-seeking practices. Focus group discussions and in-depth interviews were carried out with mothers/grandmothers and activists for documenting perceptions about health activists as treatment providers. RESULTS: One third of pneumonia (113/334) and one quarter of diarrhoea (102/408) cases at end-line were treated by Accredited Social Health Activists. Proportion of households seeking care from private providers (mostly unqualified) reduced significantly from baseline to endline (81-56% for diarrhoea, p < 0.01; 78-48% for pneumonia, p < 0.01). At endline, activists were considered an acceptable and attractive source for treatment near home. CONCLUSION: Trained Accredited Social Health Activists can treat uncomplicated childhood illnesses and are accepted by the community in this role.