Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
2.
J Clin Aesthet Dermatol ; 15(2): 40-43, 2022 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35309877

ABSTRACT

Facial injections with hyaluronic acid (HA) dermal fillers have become increasingly common. Hyaluronic acid is currently the most frequently used dermal filler. When compared to collagen for the treatment of nasolabial folds, HA not only produces similar cosmetic results with smaller doses but also lasts longer. Our objective was to evaluate the results of 10 patients with vascular complications associated with HA fillers treated with ultrasound-guided injection of hyaluronidase (HYAL) according to the Brazilian Society of Dermatology guidelines. Admission clinical evaluation revealed that the most frequent signs were: livedo reticularis (100% of the patients), hypoesthesia (50%) and local pain (20%). Although 80% of the patients complained of local pain during HYAL injection, none of them persisted with pain after the procedure ended. The total dose of injected HYAL per patient ranged from 300 to 750 IU (mean 500 IU). Post-HYAL treatment Doppler ultrasound showed pervious facial arteries and veins in 100% of the patients.

3.
Dermatol Surg ; 38(4): 635-9, 2012 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22221551

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Lower extremity telangiectasia affects approximately 40% of women. The demand for aesthetic treatment of these veins continues to grow. Few studies have compared laser and sclerotherapy to treat leg telangiectasias. OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy of conventional sclerotherapy and neodymium-doped yttrium aluminum garnet (Nd:YAG) laser in the treatment of leg telangiectasias. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Thirty women were enrolled in the study. One leg was randomly assigned laser treatment and the other sclerotherapy with 75% glucose solution. All patients were photographed before and after treatment. The applying physician and two independent observers rated photographic improvement of the treated areas. Complications and adverse effects were noted during follow-up. Patients answered a questionnaire that addressed pain, clearing of the vessels, and satisfaction with the results. RESULTS: There was a significant difference between the modes of treatment regarding pain. Twelve patients using laser and 16 using sclerotherapy considered the clearing of the vessels to be good to excellent after three sessions of both laser and scleratherapy. Mean scores after photographic assessment were 7.9 for laser and 7.0 for sclerotherapy. CONCLUSION: Lower extremity telangiectases may be treated equally well using Nd:YAG 1064-nm laser or conventional sclerotherapy.


Subject(s)
Lasers, Solid-State/therapeutic use , Leg/blood supply , Sclerotherapy , Telangiectasis/therapy , Adult , Aged , Female , Humans , Middle Aged , Prospective Studies , Single-Blind Method
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...