Diagnosis of sustainable collaboration in health promotion - a case study.

BACKGROUND: Collaborations are important to health promotion in addressing multi-party problems. Interest in collaborative processes in health promotion is rising, but still lacks monitoring instruments. The authors developed the DIagnosis of Sustainable Collaboration (DISC) model to enable comprehensive monitoring of public health collaboratives. The model focuses on opportunities and impediments for collaborative change, based on evidence from interorganizational collaboration, organizational behavior and planned organizational change. To illustrate and assess the DISC-model, the 2003/2004 application of the model to the Dutch whole-school health promotion collaboration is described. METHODS: The study combined quantitative research, using a cross-sectional survey, with qualitative research using the personal interview methodology and document analysis. A DISC-based survey was sent to 55 stakeholders in whole-school health promotion in one Dutch region. The survey consisted of 22 scales with 3 to 8 items. Only scales with a reliability score of 0.60 were accepted. The analysis provided for comparisons between stakeholders from education, public service and public health.The survey was followed by approaching 14 stakeholders for a semi-structured DISC-based interview. As the interviews were timed after the survey, the interviews were used to clarify unexpected and unclear outcomes of the survey as well.Additionally, a DISC-based document analysis was conducted including minutes of meetings, project descriptions and correspondence with schools and municipalities. RESULTS: Response of the survey was 77% and of the interviews 86%. Significant differences between respondents of different domains were found for the following scales: organizational characteristics scale, the change strategies, network development, project management, willingness to commit and innovative actions and adaptations. The interviews provided a more specific picture of the state of the art of the studied collaboration regarding the DISC-constructs. CONCLUSION: The DISC-model is more than just the sum of the different parameters provided in the literature on interorganizational collaboration, organization change, networking and setting-approaches. Monitoring a collaboration based on the DISC-model yields insight into windows of opportunity and current impediments for collaborative change. DISC-based monitoring is a promising strategy enabling project managers and social entrepreneurs to plan change management strategies systematically.

Comprehensive quality assessment of healthy school interventions.

OBJECTIVES: The number of healthy school interventions of unknown quality overwhelms schools. Quality is a construct that is differently interpreted by teachers and health promoters. The schoolBeat checklist for quality assessment of healthy school interventions incorporates the quality perceptions of both professional groups. To support quality improvements - and thus effectiveness - in school health promotion, this study evaluates the schoolBeat checklist. METHODS: Twenty-nine healthy school interventions were assessed in the Netherlands, each by two health promoters and two teachers-individually and at a consensus meeting. Generalizability coefficients were calculated for the nine specific quality criteria. RESULTS: The mean consensus score differs from the mean average individual score for two out of nine criteria. To obtain a threshold Generalizability coefficient of 0.70, the number of assessors required per criterion ranges from 1.6 to 10.8, with an average of 4.7. CONCLUSION: Quality assessment procedures of healthy school interventions using the schoolBeat checklist require about four experienced assessors from each professional domain to facilitate reliable quality scores based on individual assessment only. Publicly available quality scores enable the inclusion of high quality interventions in school policies in order to increase the impact of school health.

Development of a collaborative model to improve school health promotion in The Netherlands.

In recent decades, school health promotion programs have been developing into whole-school health approaches. This has been accompanied by a greater understanding among health promoters of the core-business of schools, namely education, and how health promotion objectives can be integrated into this task. Evidence of the positive impact of school health promotion on health risk behavior of students is increasing. This article focuses on the processes and initial results of developing a collaborative model tailored for whole-school health in the Netherlands, named schoolBeat. The Dutch situation is characterized by fragmentation, a variety of health and welfare groups supporting schools, and a lack of sound integrated youth policies. A literature review, observations, and stakeholder consultation provided a clear picture of the current situation in school health promotion, and factors limiting a comprehensive and needs-based approach to school health. This revealed that a health promotion team within a school is fundamental to an effective approach to tailored school health promotion. A respected member of school staff should chair this team. To strengthen the link with the school care team, the school care coordinator should be a member of both teams. To provide coordinated support to all schools in a region, participating organizations decided to share advisory tasks. These tasks are included in the regular health promotion work of their staff. This means working with one advisor representing all school-health organizations per school, and using a comprehensive overview of possible support and projects promoting health. Empowering schools in needs assessments and comprehensive school health promotion is an important element of the developed approach. This article concludes with an examination of emerging issues in evaluating collaborative school health support during the first 18 months of development, and implementation and future perspectives regarding sustainable collaboration and quality improvement.

Nurse-led shared care diabetes projects: lessons from the nurses' viewpoint.

This paper explores the experiences of four nurse practitioners specialised in diabetes care, in the development and implementation of two Dutch nurse-led shared care projects to improve quality of care. The focus is on the impeding factors involved. The nurses' views are compared to those of the 38 participating physicians by using instruments of qualitative research. Both nurses and physicians consider the way shared care delivery has been structured as the most impeding factor, particularly downward substitution of care from doctor to nurse. In the end, lessons are drawn for nurses, doctors and managers, to solve the assessed impediments to shared care.

Patient focus groups about nurse-led shared care for the chronically ill.

Traditional care offered to chronically ill people does not succeed in bridging the gap between primary and secondary care in a way that suits chronic patients' needs. So-called nurse-led shared care may offer a solution, in which a specialised nurse practitioner plays a co-ordinating role at patient level. In this article two nurse-led shared care models for patients with diabetes mellitus type 2 and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) are looked upon through the patient's eye. Joint focus groups are conducted in which patients judge the models according to their experiences and indicate the importance they attribute to quality issues. Most of them experience the shared care models as positive and prefer them compared to traditional care. The main quality aspect concerns the provision of information, although its performance needs improvement. The outcome indicates that the qualitative method of patient focus groups should become standard procedure in evaluating the shared care, supported by quantitative means.