ABSTRACT
AIM: To describe the phenotypic and genotypic profiles of Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase-producing K. pneumoniae (KPC-Kp) strains isolated from patients with invasive infections at an Italian university hospital in order to assess the epidemiological trend. METHODS: An observational prospective study was undertaken at the University Hospital of Sassari, Italy to detect KPC-Kp strains in patients with invasive bacteraemia. Isolates were identified phenotypically; carbapenemase production was assessed using phenotypic and genotypic methods. Sequencing of blaKPC genes, pulsed-field gel electrophoresis and multi-locus sequence typing were performed. RESULTS: During the period 2015-2017, 46 cases of invasive infection with K. pneumoniae were recorded. Two-thirds (67.4%) of the patients were male, and the mean age was 69.4 years. Most patients had at least one comorbidity (56.5%) and/or had been hospitalized previously (70.5%), 81.8% had current or recent medical device use, and 85.4% had recent antibiotic exposure. The mortality rate was 52.3%. A multi-drug-resistant pattern (including carbapenems, fluoroquinolones, third-/fourth-generation cephalosporins) was shown for all K. pneumoniae isolates. KPC-3 and -2 were produced by all strains. The most common sequence types were 512 (91.3%) and 101 (8.7%), grouped into three clusters (A, A1 and B). CONCLUSIONS: A high incidence of KPC-Kp in patients with invasive infections was recorded at an Italian university hospital compared with the incidence measured before 2015. This study confirmed the importance of the KPC-3 carbapenemase variant, as reported by other Italian studies. High mortality and comorbidity rates appear to be associated with KPC-Kp infection.
Subject(s)
Bacteremia/transmission , Carbapenem-Resistant Enterobacteriaceae/isolation & purification , Cross Infection/transmission , Disease Transmission, Infectious , Genotype , Klebsiella Infections/transmission , Klebsiella pneumoniae/isolation & purification , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Anti-Bacterial Agents/pharmacology , Bacteremia/epidemiology , Bacteremia/microbiology , Bacteremia/mortality , Carbapenem-Resistant Enterobacteriaceae/classification , Carbapenem-Resistant Enterobacteriaceae/genetics , Cross Infection/epidemiology , Cross Infection/microbiology , Cross Infection/mortality , Drug Resistance, Multiple, Bacterial , Electrophoresis, Gel, Pulsed-Field , Female , Hospitals, University , Humans , Incidence , Italy/epidemiology , Klebsiella Infections/epidemiology , Klebsiella Infections/microbiology , Klebsiella Infections/mortality , Klebsiella pneumoniae/classification , Klebsiella pneumoniae/genetics , Male , Microbial Sensitivity Tests , Middle Aged , Molecular Epidemiology , Multilocus Sequence Typing , Prospective Studies , Sequence Analysis, DNA , Survival AnalysisABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Healthcare-associated infections (HAIs) are an important issue in terms of quality of care. HAIs impact patient safety by contributing to higher rates of preventable mortality and prolonged hospitalizations. In Italy, analysis of the currently available accreditation systems shows a substantial heterogeneity of approaches for the prevention and surveillance of HAIs in hospitals. The aim of the present study is to develop and propose the use of a synthetic assessment tool that could be implemented homogenously throughout the nation. METHODS: An analysis of nine international and of the 21 Italian regional accreditation systems was conducted in order to identify requirements and indicators implemented for HAI prevention and control. Two relevant reviews on this topic were further analyzed to identify additional evidence-based criteria. The project team evaluated all the requirements and indicators with consensus meeting methodology, then those applicable to the Italian context were grouped into a set of "focus areas". RESULTS: The analysis of international systems and Italian regional accreditation manuals led to the identification respectively of 19 and 14 main requirements, with relevant heterogeneity in their application. Additional evidence-based criteria were included from the reviews analysis. From the consensus among the project team members all the standards were compared and 20 different thematic areas were identified, with a total of 96 requirements and indicators for preventing and monitoring HAIs. CONCLUSIONS: The study reveals a great heterogeneity in the definition of accreditation criteria between the Italian regions. The introduction of a uniform, synthetic assessment instrument, based on the review of national and international standards, may serve as a self-assessment tool to evaluate the achievement of a minimum standards set for HAIs prevention and control in healthcare facilities. This may be used as an assessment tool by the Italian institutional accreditation system, also useful to reduce regional disparities.
