Arterio-Ureteral Fistula: A Rare Elusive Cause of Significant Hematuria.

Arterioureteral fistula (AUF) is a direct communication between the ureter and an artery and is a rare cause of catastrophic, life-threatening haematuria. Fistulation may occur between the ureter and the abdominal aorta, common iliac, external and internal iliac, and inferior mesenteric arteries, and is typically observed in patients with a prior history of pelvic radiotherapy, oncological pelvic surgeries, aortoiliac vascular procedures, and pelvic exenteration. There is also an increased frequency of cases amongst patients who have undergone urological diversion surgeries and in those with chronic indwelling ureteric stents requiring repeated exchange. As AUF is so rarely encountered in clinical practice, the urologist may fail to appreciate its presence until late in the patient's presentation; such diagnostic delay is associated with high mortality and thus rapid clinical suspicion and investigative action are necessary. There are sporadic cases of this rare entity mentioned in literature. In this report, we present two cases as well as a review of the literature. A 73-year-old female presented with repeated episodic haematuria for a week in whom the cause of symptoms remained persistently elusive despite repeated imaging and operative approaches. An eventual diagnosis of a secondary right internal iliac-ureteral fistula was ascertained on a subsequent digital subtraction angiography of the renal tract. The fistula was embolised using an endovascular approach. The patient remained stable post emobilisation and was successfully discharged shortly after the procedure. In the second case, a 51-year-old female, presented with hematuria from her ileal conduit for a few days. Initially, the cause of symptoms was thought to be due to ureteric stents. During a change in her stents, brisk bleeding led to further investigation including an iliac angiogram confirming bleeding from the left common iliac artery. She had a covered common iliac artery stent, which successfully controlled her bleeding This report emphasizes the diagnostic difficulty of AUF, outlines the management principles of this rare disease, and aims to increase awareness of this rare yet potentially lethal phenomenon among practitioners of urology and interventional radiology.

Importance of Touch: Managing Testicular Torsion in a 28-Year-Old With Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy.

This case report highlights a case of testicular torsion in a man over the age of 25 with Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD), who presented with an atypical pain history, and a Testicular Workup for Ischaemia and Suspected Torsion (TWIST) score negative for exploration. However, based purely on the examination findings, scrotal exploration was performed and a torted testis was found. The report demonstrates that in this cohort of patients, a higher index of suspicion is needed to ensure early recognition of the condition. Furthermore, scrotal exploration can be safely conducted under local anaesthesia given the multiple cardiovascular and spinal co-morbidities attributed to DMD.

Day-case catheterless and drainless minimal-access pyeloplasty in adults: A single-center experience of 13 years.

OBJECTIVES: To analyze our practice of drainless and catheterless day-case minimal-access pyeloplasty with regard to feasibility, safety and long-term outcomes. METHODS: Patients undergoing minimal-access pyeloplasty (laparoscopic, with or without robotic assistance) in a single center between 2007 and 2020 were included in this retrospective observational study. Patient demographics and the success rate of day-case discharge along with postoperative outcomes were analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 129 patients underwent minimal-access pyeloplasty in this time period, of whom 116 met the inclusion criteria. The mean patient age was 48 years. A total of 65% of the patients (n = 75) were discharged on the same day and 88% (n = 101) were discharged within 23 h of surgery. Of the 14 patients with a hospital stay of >24 h, pain was the most common reason (60%) for delayed discharge. The overall subjective (pain-free status) and objective (unobstructed drainage) success rates were 91% and 86%, respectively. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates that routine drains or urethral catheters are not necessary in minimal-access pyeloplasty, and their omission could facilitate early recovery and day-case discharge without compromising long-term surgical outcomes. Large randomized controlled studies are required to prospectively evaluate outcomes.

Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Donor Nephrectomy vs Standard Laparoscopic Donor Nephrectomy: A Prospective Randomized Comparative Study.

OBJECTIVE: The goal of this randomized controlled trial was to compare the outcomes of robot-assisted laparoscopic donor nephrectomy (RDN) with standard laparoscopic donor nephrectomy (LDN). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty-five voluntary kidney donors (27 for right subgroup and 18 for left subgroup) who met inclusion and exclusion criteria were randomized into 2 groups, RDN and LDN in 1:2 ratio. Primary endpoints were visual analogue scale (VAS) pain scores, analgesic requirement, and hospital stay of donors. Secondary endpoints were donor's intraoperative and postoperative parameters, graft outcomes, and donor surgeon's difficulty scores. RESULTS: All procedures were completed without any intraoperative complications. VAS pain scores at 6, 24, and 48 hours (p = 0.00), analgesic requirement (p = 0.00), and hospital stay (p = 0.00) were less in RDN than in LDN. Longer graft arterial length could be preserved with robotic approach on right side (p = 0.03) but not on left side (p = 0.77). The RDN group required more number of ports (p = 0.00), longer retrieval time (p = 0.00), and warm ischemia time (WIT) (p = 0.01). Total operative time (p = 0.14), hemoglobin drop (p = 0.97), postoperative donor complications (p = 0.97), and the recipient estimated glomerular filtration rate at 9 months (p = 0.64) were similar in both groups. Difficulty scores of console surgeon were less in most steps on right side but not on left side. Patient-side surgeon in RDN had higher difficulty scores for retrieval. CONCLUSION: RDN is safe and is associated with better morbidity profile than LDN. Robotic approach provides technical ease and facilitates preservation of longer length of renal artery on right side. Left RDN is associated with longer WIT; however, this does not translate into poor graft outcome.