Resident Remediation: A National Survey of Urology Program Directors.

OBJECTIVES: To describe formal remediation rates and processes in urology training programs nationally. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: We performed a cross-sectional study by surveying program directors (PDs) through the Society of Academic Urologists. Formal remediation was defined as the process initiated when resident competency deficiencies were significant enough to necessitate documentation and notification of the Graduate Medical Education (GME) office. The primary outcome was the prevalence of urology programs that initiated formal remediation over the past 5 years. Secondary outcomes included reported competency deficiencies and formal remediation processes. RESULTS: Across 148 institutions, 73 (49%) PDs responded to the survey. The majority of PDs (67%, 49/73) stated that at least 1 resident underwent formal remediation over the last 5 years (median 1). "Professionalism" and "Interpersonal and Communication Skills" were the most common competency deficiencies that prompted formal remediation, whereas "Technical Skill" was the least common. While the majority of respondents notified the GME office of residents undergoing remediation, formal remediation plans varied from faculty coaching and mentorship (80%, 39/49) to simulation training (10%, 5/49). Absence of documented faculty feedback on poor performance was the most commonly cited barrier to formal remediation. The majority of PDs reported documentation in a resident's file (81%, 59/73); however, remediation processes differed with only half of PDs reporting that GME offices were routinely involved in creating and overseeing corrective action plans (56%, 41/73). Over the study period, 15% (11/73) of PDs did not promote a resident to the next year of training, and 23% (17/73) of PDs stated "Yes" to graduating a resident who they would not trust to care for a loved one. CONCLUSIONS: Formal remediation among urology residency programs is common, and processes vary across institutions. The most common competency areas prompting remediation were "Professionalism" and "Interpersonal and Communication Skills." Future research should address developing resources to facilitate resident remediation.

The Utility of a Virtual Emergency Medicine Elective for Visiting Medical Students.

Background Away rotations allow emergency medicine (EM)-bound fourth-year medical students to experience a residency program's educational culture and influence the ranking of residency programs. The financial cost and geographic distance have limited student participation in away electives. In recent years, COVID-19 pandemic-related restrictions on away rotations resulted in the creation of multiple virtual courses. Despite the lifting of restrictions, these courses may still have utility in helping students circumvent barriers to away rotations. Limitations of previously described courses include insufficient student-faculty interaction, which influences students' understanding of the educational environment. We sought to develop and evaluate a virtual EM elective for fourth-year medical students, focused on student-faculty interaction including precepted patient contact. Methodology We developed a two-week virtual EM elective for fourth-year medical students incorporating teaching sessions designed to optimize student-faculty interactions and attending-supervised telemedicine visits. After completion of the course, students completed an anonymous course evaluation. Results Course evaluations showed that the course improved students' understanding of our residency's educational environment by providing students with access to our residency program. The most frequently cited factors preventing participation in a traditional away elective were financial cost, limit in the allowed number of away rotations, and challenges in finding housing. Conclusions We believe this course may be an effective way of improving visiting students' understanding of the educational culture of our EM residency program. Thus, although pandemic-related restrictions have been lifted, this course may serve as a valuable adjunct to the traditional away EM rotation.

The utility of an online discussion board for reflective writing in an emergency medicine rotation.

Background: Narrative analysis and reflection have been found to support professional identity formation (PIF) and resilience among medical students. In the emergency department, students have used reflective practice to process challenging clinical experiences, such as ethical dilemmas or moral distress. An online discussion board, however, has not been described as a curricular component of emergency medicine (EM) rotations. The objective of this educational innovation was to support medical students in an EM clinical rotation via an online discussion board for reflecting on and debriefing clinical experiences with faculty and peers. Methods: Fifty-two medical students enrolled in the pass/fail EM elective between May 13, 2019, and October 30, 2020. Each cohort of six students took part in a cohort-specific discussion using the Canvas learning management system. Students were encouraged to post about any observations, reflections, or emotions after their shifts. Faculty course directors responded to each post using concepts of debriefing, coaching, and trauma-informed teaching. Results: Over 18 months, 49 of 52 (94%) students participated in the discussion board. Of 346 total posts, half were by students, and the other half were faculty responses. Students posted 3.27 times each, on average. Students rarely raised questions about scientific knowledge content, fact-based aspects of patient care, or specific skills. Rather, they often posted about intensely affective reactions to experiences that left them with complex emotions. Upon review of posts by the course directors, the majority (54%) of students' posts contained a range of affective responses. Students appreciated faculty responses and supported each other in their written responses to peers. Conclusions: An online discussion board can be used successfully for asynchronous reflective practice to debrief clinical experiences during an EM rotation, if designed incorporating faculty and peer support using trauma-informed teaching principles to bolster well-being and PIF.

KNOWLEDGE, ATTITUDES AND PERCEPTIONS OF REMEDIATION AMONG TRAINEES IN GRADUATE MEDICAL EDUCATION PROGRAMS.

BACKGROUND: Remediation of medical trainees is a universal challenge, yet studies show that many residents will need remediation to improve performance. Current literature discusses the importance and processes of remediation and investigates how to recognize residents needing remediation. However, little is known about trainees' attitudes and perception of remediation. OBJECTIVES: To assess trainees' knowledge of remediation as well as their attitudes and perceptions toward remediation and its process. We hypothesized that trainees have limited knowledge and a negative perception of remediation. METHODS: A cross-sectional anonymous electronic survey was sent to all graduate medical education trainees at a single institution. RESULTS: The survey was completed by 132/1095 (12.1%) trainees. Of the respondents, 7.6% were not familiar with the term "remediation." Trainees' knowledge of remediation processes was variable, and they reported overwhelmingly negative thoughts and attitudes toward remediation. Shame was felt by 97/132 (73.5%), 71/132 (53.8%) felt disadvantaged, and 121/132 (91.7%) viewed the term "remediation" negatively. Most trainees felt using a more positive term would improve perceptions, and 124/132 (93.9%) felt residents should be involved in creating individualized remediation plans. Open-ended responses on reactions to being placed on remediation included disappointment, shame, incompetency, anxiety and worry, embarrassment, unhappiness, suicidality, worthlessness, sense of failure, and doubting one's capabilities as a physician. CONCLUSION: Trainees have limited knowledge and understanding of remediation and strong negative perceptions and attitudes toward the remediation process. Trainees suggested that reframing of remediation using more positive terminology and including residents in creating individualized plans, may improve attitudes and perceptions of this process.

Changing the Landscape of Remediation: The Creation and Implementation of an Institution-Wide Graduate Medical Education Performance Enhancement Program.

Purpose Remediation is a daunting process for both residency leadership and trainees due to several factors including limited time and resources, variable processes, and negative stigma. Our objective was to transform the remediation process by creating a transparent institution-wide program that collates tools/resources, interdepartmental faculty mentors, and positive rebranding. Methods Education leadership across seven specialties created a process for trainees with professionalism and interpersonal-communication skills deficiencies. Formalized departmental program-based improvement plan (PIP) and an institutional house staff performance enhancement plan (HPEP) were developed by consensus of triggers/behaviors. Utilizing published literature, a toolkit was created and implemented. Trainees were enrolled in HPEP if PIP was unsuccessful or exhibited ≥1 major trigger. Wellness evaluations were incorporated into the process to screen for external contributing factors. Surveys were sent to the program director (PD), faculty mentor, and trainee one month and six months after participation. Results Between 2018 and 2021, 12 trainees were enrolled. Overall feedback from PDs and the trainees was positive. The main challenge was finding mutual time for the faculty mentor and trainee to meet. Six-month surveys reported no relapses in unprofessionalism. One-year follow-up of the trainees was limited. Conclusions Utilizing an institution-wide standardized process of performance improvement with the removal of negative stereotyping is a unique approach to remediation. Initial feedback is promising, and future outcome data are necessary to assess the utility. The HPEP may be adopted by other academic institutions and may shift the attitudes about remediation and allow trainees to see the process as an opportunity for professional growth.

Deciphering a Changing Match Environment in Emergency Medicine and Identifying Residency Program Needs.

INTRODUCTION: The Match in emergency medicine (EM) is historically competitive for applicants; however, the 2022 residency Match had a large number of unfilled positions. We sought to characterize the impact of and response to the Match on programs and determine programs' needs for successful recruitment strategies. METHODS: We conducted a web-based survey of EM residency program leadership during March-April 2022. Program characteristics were generated from publicly available data, and descriptive statistics were generated. We analyzed free-text responses thematically. RESULTS: There were 133/277 (48%) categorical EM residency programs that responded. Of those, 53.8% (70/130) reported a negative impression of their Match results; 17.7% (23/130) positive; and the remainder neutral (28.5%; 37/130). Three- and four-year programs did not differ in their risk of unfilled status. Hybrid programs had a higher likelihood of going unfilled (odds ratio [OR] 4.52, confidence interval [CI] 1.7-12.04) vs community (OR 1.62, CI 0.68-3.86) or university programs (0.16, 0.0-0.49). Unfilled programs were geographically concentrated. The quality of applicants was perceived the same as previous years and did not differ between filled and unfilled programs. Respondents worried the expansion of EM residency positions and perceptions of the EM job market were major factors influencing the Match. They expressed interest in introducing changes to the interview process, including caps on applications and interviews, as well as a need for more structural support for programs and the specialty. CONCLUSION: This survey identifies impacts of the changed match environment on a broad range of programs and identifies specific needs. Future work should be directed toward a deeper understanding of the factors contributing to changes in the specialty and the development of evidence-based interventions.

The Emergency Medicine Milestones 2.0: Setting the stage for 2025 and beyond.

INTRODUCTION: Beginning in 1999, residents in emergency medicine have been expected to demonstrate competence in the six Accreditation Council on Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) Core Competencies. Expectations were further refined and clarified through the introduction of the Milestones in 2013. Emerging research and data from milestone reporting has illustrated the need for modification of the original milestones. Against this backdrop, the ACGME convened a committee to review and revise the original milestones. METHODS: The working group was convened in December 2018 and consisted of representatives from the American Board of Emergency Medicine, American Osteopathic Association, Council of Residency Directors in Emergency Medicine, Association of American Medical Colleges, ACGME-Emergency Medicine Review Committee, three community members, a resident member, and a public member. This group also included members from both academic and community emergency medicine programs. The group was overseen by the ACGME vice president for milestones development and met in person one time followed by four virtual sessions to revise and draft the Emergency Medicine Milestones and Supplemental Guide as part of the ACGME Milestones 2.0 Project. RESULTS: Using data from milestones reporting, needs assessment data, stakeholder interviews, and community commentary, the working group engaged in revisions and updates for the Emergency Medicine Milestones and created a supplemental guide to aid programs in the design of programmatic assessment for the milestones. CONCLUSION: The Emergency Medicine Milestones 2.0 provide updated specialty-specific, competency-based behavioral anchors to guide the assessment of residents, the design of curricula, and the advancement of emergency medicine training programs.

Comparison of State Medical Licensing Board Disclosures Regarding Resident Performance for United States Allopathic, Osteopathic, and Foreign Medical Graduates.

CONTEXT: While recent streamlining of the graduate medical education process signals an important change from the traditional dichotomy between doctors of osteopathic medicine (DOs) and US-trained doctors of medicine (USMDs), this new uniformity does not continue into the process for licensure, including state medical licensing verification of training (VOT) forms for DOs, MDs, and foreign medical graduates (FMGs). Wide variability remains. OBJECTIVE: To document the differences in the performance metrics program that directors are required to disclose to state medical licensing boards for DOs and FMGs compared with USMDs. METHODS: VOT forms were collected from all osteopathic and allopathic licensing boards for all US states, Washington DC, and US territories. The authors then reviewed VOT forms for questions pertaining to trainee performance only in states where VOT forms differed for DOs, USMDs, and FMGs. Licensing board questions were categorized as relating to disciplinary action, documents placed on file, resident actions, and nondisciplinary actions by the program. RESULTS: Fifty-six states and territories were included in the study (50 US states; Washington, DC; and 5 US territories). Most states and territories (46; 82.1%) used the same VOT form for DOs and USMDs. All states and territories except New York used the same form for FMGs and USMDs (55; 98.2%). Of the 14 states with an osteopathic board, Nevada used Federation Credentials Verification Service (FCVS) for DOs only, and 8 states used a unique osteopathic VOT form. Of these 8 osteopathic boards, 3 VOT forms did not ask any questions regarding resident performance during training. Of the remaining 5 forms, all asked about disciplinary actions. Ten states and 1 territory (US Virgin Islands) required the FCVS for both USMDs and FMGs, but not for DOs, while New York required FCVS only for FMGs. Nevada required FCVS only for DOs. CONCLUSION: Although VOT requirements for FMGs and USMDs were mostly the same within states, performance metric question sets varied greatly from state to state and within states for osteopathic vs allopathic licensing boards. Implementation of a standardized VOT form for all applicants that includes academic performance metrics may help ensure that medical licensure is granted to all physicians who demonstrate academic competency during training, regardless of their degree.

Maintenance of Skill Proficiency for Emergency Skills With and Without Adjuncts Despite the Use of Level C Personal Protective Equipment.

Objective To determine the impact of Level C personal protective equipment (PPE) on the time to perform intravenous (IV) cannulation and endotracheal intubation, both with and without the use of adjuncts. Methods This prospective, case-control study of emergency medicine resident physicians was designed to assess the time taken by each subject to perform endotracheal intubation using both direct laryngoscopy (DL) and video laryngoscopy (VL), as well as peripheral IV cannulation both with and without ultrasound guidance and with and without PPE. Results While median times were higher using VL as compared to DL, there was no significant difference between intubation with either DL or VL in subjects with and without Level C PPE. Similarly, no significant difference in time was found for intravenous cannulation in the PPE and no-PPE groups, both with and without ultrasound guidance. Conclusions Existing skill proficiency was maintained despite wearing PPE and there was no advantage with the addition of adjuncts such as video-assisted laryngoscopy and ultrasound-guided intravenous cannulation. A safe and cost-effective strategy might be to conduct basic, just-in-time PPE training to enhance familiarity with donning, doffing, and mobility, and couple this with the use of personnel who have maximal proficiency in the relevant emergency skill, instead of more expensive, continuous, skills-focused PPE training.

55-year-old Woman with Headache, Vomiting, and Visual Disturbance.

CASE PRESENTATION: A 55-year-old woman with a past medical history of hypertension, hyperlipidemia, and iron deficiency anemia presented to the emergency department with three days of headache, nausea, vomiting, and visual changes. Her vital signs were within normal limits. She was noted to have a left cranial nerve six palsy on exam. RESULTS: Her laboratory testing revealed leukocytosis, hyponatremia, and hypokalemia. A non-contrast computed tomography scan of the head revealed an enlarged sella turcica and pituitary gland with hemorrhage and deviation of the optic chiasm. CONCLUSION: Her symptoms improved and she was discharged from the hospital in stable condition.

Three- vs. Four-Year Emergency Medicine Training Programs.

Postgraduate training in emergency medicine (EM) varies in length among different programs. This fact creates a dilemma for applicants to the specialty of EM and prevents EM educators from reaching a consensus regarding the optimal length of training. Historically, EM training existed in the postgraduate year (PGY) 1-3, 2-4, and 1-4 formats, until the PGY 2-4 program became obsolete in 2011-2012. Currently, three-quarters of EM programs follow the PGY 1-3 format. In this article, we clarify for the applicants the main differences between the PGY 1-3 and PGY 1-4 formats. We also discuss the institutional, personal, and graduate considerations that explain why an institution or an individual would choose one format over the other.

Mandated State Medical Licensing Board Disclosures Regarding Resident Performance.

BACKGROUND: State medical licensing boards ask program directors (PDs) to complete verification of training (VOT) forms for licensure. While residency programs use Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education core competencies, there is no uniform process or set of metrics that licensing boards use to ascertain if academic competency was achieved. OBJECTIVE: We determined the performance metrics PDs are required to disclose on state licensing VOT forms. METHODS: VOT forms for allopathic medical licensing boards for all 50 states, Washington, DC, and 5 US territories were obtained via online search and reviewed. Questions were categorized by disciplinary action (investigated, disciplined, placed on probation, expelled, terminated); documents placed on file; resident actions (leave of absence, request for transfer, unexcused absences); and non-disciplinary actions (remediation, partial or no credit, non-renewal, non-promotion, extra training required). Three individuals reviewed all forms independently, compared results, and jointly resolved discrepancies. A fourth independent reviewer confirmed all results. RESULTS: Most states and territories (45 of 56) accept the Federation Credentials Verification Service (FCVS), but 33 states have their own VOT forms. Ten states require FCVS use. Most states ask questions regarding probation (43), disciplinary action (41), and investigation (37). Thirty-four states and territories ask about documents placed on file, 36 ask about resident actions, and 7 ask about non-disciplinary actions. Eight states' VOT forms ask no questions regarding resident performance. CONCLUSIONS: Among the states and territories, there is great variability in VOT forms required for allopathic physicians. These forms focus on disciplinary actions and do not ask questions PDs use to assess resident performance.

An Emergency Medicine Remediation Consult Service: Access to Expert Remediation Advice and Resources.

Resident remediation is a complex and common issue in emergency medicine programs and requires a specific knowledge base. The Remediation Task Force (RTF) of the Council of Residency Directors in Emergency Medicine (CORD-EM) was created to identify remediation best practices and to develop tools for program directors. Initially housed on a Wiki page, and now located within the CORD-EM website, the RTF provides resources including accepted universal language for documentation and sample remediation plans. The RTF also created a remediation consult service composed of experienced educators to provide real-time structured feedback and advice to submitted remediation scenarios with consultation outcomes and conclusions uploaded to the website. CORD-EM members now have easy access to online resources and expert advice for remediation queries through the consult service. The combination of online resources and access to real-time expert advice is an innovative approach to improving resident remediation and recognizing best practices.

The Impact of Interdisciplinary Education on Skills and Attitudes of Surgery and Emergency Medicine Residents.

Background Interdisciplinary education (IDE) has been proposed as a means to improve patient safety by enhancing the performance of diverse health care teams. The improved camaraderie between members of different specialties may enhance communication and can foster a more supportive and positive work environment. Objective This study was aimed to assess the effect of IDE on the procedural skills of general surgery (GS) and emergency medicine (EM), as well as the perceptions that GS and EM residents have of one another. Methods EM and GS residents participated in two separate IDE sessions (4 months apart) designed to teach extended focused assessment with sonography in trauma (e-FAST), tube thoracostomy, and complex wound closure. Surveys were administered to determine the effects that IDE had on confidence in performing bedside procedures, perceptions of IDE, and perceptions of one another's specialty. Survey responses were recorded using a 5-point Likert's scale. Results Nine GS residents and 10 EM residents participated in the entire study. Significant improvements in the confidence levels of performing bedside procedures were noted among both groups of residents. We also report a significant improvement in the perceived respect and communication between EM and GS residents. Conclusions Although further studies with a larger sample size are required, we have shown that IDE can improve the confidence levels of EM and GS residents in performing tube thoracostomy, e-FAST, and complex wound closure. These IDE sessions also improve the perceptions that the residents have of one another. IDE is a useful tool and may translate into improved consultation, collaboration, and patient care.

Prophylactic systemic antibiotics for anterior epistaxis treated with nasal packing in the ED.

BACKGROUND: Emergency Department (ED) patients presenting with spontaneous epistaxis who have anterior nasal packing are routinely prescribed systemic prophylactic antibiotics in spite of the lack of supporting evidence-based literature. Although there is literature that discusses infection rates with nasal packing for epistaxis and prophylactic antibiotics prescribing practices of otolaryngologists, this is the first study to our knowledge that examines the practices of emergency physicians. OBJECTIVES: The main objective of this study was to compare the infection rate between patients who were and were not prescribed prophylactic systemic antibiotics for anterior nasal packing in spontaneous epistaxis and to examine current management practices of antibiotic prescribing for these patients. METHODS: A retrospective review of ED patients ≥ 18 years old with the discharge diagnosis of epistaxis was performed over a 5-year period. Patients who had multiple visits to the ED for epistaxis or recent nasal or sinus surgery were excluded. RESULTS: Over half of the patients, 57/106 (53.7%), who had anterior packing were prescribed prophylactic systemic antibiotics. Of these patients, 69/106 (65%) returned for a follow-up visit. There were no documented infections for any of these patients regardless of whether or not they were prescribed antibiotics. There was no significant difference with respect to rate of infection found between these two groups (the p-value = 0.263). CONCLUSION: The absence of infection supports previous findings and suggests that prophylactic antibiotic use for nasal packing in spontaneous epistaxis patients is not necessary. Further randomized controlled studies are necessary to definitively support this practice change.

Remediation Strategies for Emergency Medicine Patient Care Milestones.

Early identification and successful remediation of unachieved emergency medicine (EM) milestones are challenging for program directors. Residents who fail to achieve milestones in the expected time frame will have varied educational needs to course correct, dependent on the year of training, as well as the specific deficiencies to resolve. Experts from the Council of Residency Directors in Emergency Medicine (CORD-EM) Remediation Task Force (RTF) collaborated with the objective to create tools for identifying and remediating residents with deficiencies in patient care milestones (PCMs).

Defining Uniform Processes for Remediation, Probation and Termination in Residency Training.

It is important that residency programs identify trainees who progress appropriately, as well as identify residents who fail to achieve educational milestones as expected so they may be remediated. The process of remediation varies greatly across training programs, due in part to the lack of standardized definitions for good standing, remediation, probation, and termination. The purpose of this educational advancement is to propose a clear remediation framework including definitions, management processes, documentation expectations and appropriate notifications. Informal remediation is initiated when a resident's performance is deficient in one or more of the outcomes-based milestones established by the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education, but not significant enough to trigger formal remediation. Formal remediation occurs when deficiencies are significant enough to warrant formal documentation because informal remediation failed or because issues are substantial. The process includes documentation in the resident's file and notification of the graduate medical education office; however, the documentation is not disclosed if the resident successfully remediates. Probation is initiated when a resident is unsuccessful in meeting the terms of formal remediation or if initial problems are significant enough to warrant immediate probation. The process is similar to formal remediation but also includes documentation extending to the final verification of training and employment letters. Termination involves other stakeholders and occurs when a resident is unsuccessful in meeting the terms of probation or if initial problems are significant enough to warrant immediate termination.

Antibiotic prophylaxis for oral lacerations: our emergency department's experience.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to examine the emergency physician (EP) practice of prescribing prophylactic antibiotics for patients with oral lacerations. A secondary outcome measure was the infection rate of those who were or were not prescribed antibiotics. METHODS: The study was a retrospective chart review of 323 patients who presented to a large urban emergency department (ED) between January 1, 2012 and December 31, 2012 with an oral laceration. RESULTS: Of the 323 charts reviewed, topical and/or systemic antibiotics were prescribed in the ED to 62 % (199/323) of patients. Of those patients, 38 % (75/199) received only topical antibiotics, 34 % (68/199) received only systemic antibiotics, and 28 % (56/199) were prescribed topical and systemic antibiotics. Thirty-eight percent (124/323) of patients received no antibiotics. Eighteen percent (58/323) of patients returned for follow-up with an infection rate of 10 % (6/58). There was a statistical difference in rates of infection between patients who received antibiotics and who did not receive antibiotics and a statistical difference in rates of infection between patients with complex lacerations who received and did not receive antibiotic. CONCLUSIONS: This study shows that there is a considerable amount of practice variance in prescribing prophylactic antibiotics for oral lacerations among EPs in our ED. Due to the poor follow-up rate, an accurate infection rate could not be determined. In the future, adequately powered randomized controlled studies may provide compelling data for or against the necessity for prophylactic antibiotic use for oral lacerations.