ECMO with vasopressor use during early endotoxic shock: Can it improve circulatory support and regional microcirculatory blood flow?

INTRODUCTION: While extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) is effective in preventing further hypoxemia and maintains blood flow in endotoxin-induced shock, ECMO alone does not reverse the hypotension. In this study, we tested whether concurrent vasopressor use with ECMO would provide increased circulatory support and blood flow, and characterized regional blood flow distribution to vital organs. METHODS: Endotoxic shock was induced in piglets to achieve a 30% decrease in mean arterial pressure (MAP). Measurements of untreated pigs were compared to pigs treated with ECMO alone or ECMO and vasopressors. RESULTS: ECMO provided cardiac support during vasodilatory endotoxic shock and improved oxygen delivery, but vasopressor therapy was required to return MAP to normotensive levels. Increased blood pressure with vasopressors did not alter oxygen consumption or extraction compared to ECMO alone. Regional microcirculatory blood flow (RBF) to the brain, kidney, and liver were maintained or increased during ECMO with and without vasopressors. CONCLUSION: ECMO support and concurrent vasopressor use improve regional blood flow and oxygen delivery even in the absence of full blood pressure restoration. Vasopressor-induced selective distribution of blood flow to vital organs is retained when vasopressors are administered with ECMO.

Vasopressin decreases pulmonary-to-systemic vascular resistance ratio in a porcine model of severe hemorrhagic shock.

Vasopressors are gaining renewed interest as treatment adjuncts in hemorrhagic shock. The ideal vasoconstrictor will increase systemic blood pressure without increasing pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR), which hinders pulmonary perfusion and exacerbates hypoxemia. However, the selectivity of pressors for pulmonary versus systemic vasoconstriction during hemorrhage has not been characterized. The purpose of this study was to test the hypothesis that vasopressin (VP) has distinct effects on pulmonary versus systemic hemodynamics, unlike the catecholamine vasopressors norepinephrine (NE) and phenylephrine (PE). Anesthetized and ventilated pigs were assigned to resuscitation with saline only (n = 7) or saline with VP (n = 6), NE (n = 6), or PE (n = 6). Animals were hemorrhaged to a target volume of 30 mL/kg and a mean arterial pressure of 35 mmHg. One hour after the start of hemorrhage, animals were resuscitated with saline up to one shed blood volume, followed by either additional saline or a vasopressor. Hemodynamics and oxygenation were measured hourly for 4 h after the start of hemorrhage. Vasopressin increased systemic vascular resistance (SVR) while sparing the pulmonary vasculature, leading to a 45% decrease in the PVR/SVR ratio compared with treatment with PE. Conversely, NE induced pulmonary hypertension and led to an increased PVR/SVR ratio associated with decreased oxygen saturation. Phenylephrine and crystalloid had no significant effect on the PVR/SVR ratio. Sparing of pulmonary vasoconstriction occurs only with VP, not with administration of crystalloid or catecholamine pressors. The ability of VP to maintain blood oxygenation indicates that VP may prevent hypoxemia in the management of hemorrhagic shock.