Adequacy of Parenteral Nutrition in Preterm Infants According to Current Recommendations: A Study in A Spanish Hospital.

BACKGROUND: In preterm infants, it is important to ensure adequate nutritional intake to accomplish foetal growth requirements. This study evaluated clinical practice regarding the prescription of parenteral nutrition in preterm infants in the neonatology unit of a tertiary hospital. METHODS: It was a retrospective observational study of a sample of preterm infants (n = 155) born between January 2015 and December 2017 who were prescribed parenteral nutrition. Compliance with the hospital's protocol and with the guidelines of the scientific societies American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition (ASPEN), European Society for Clinical Nutrition and Metabolism (ESPEN) and Spanish Society of Clinical Nutrition and Metabolism (SENPE) was evaluated. The differences in macronutrient intake and total duration of parenteral nutrition were analysed according to gestational age and birth weight. RESULTS: The established protocol was followed in a high percentage (95.5%-100%) except with respect to the initiation of supplying established trace elements (64.9%). Compliance with the recommendations set forth in the guidelines was between 82.1% and 100%, with the exception of the initial carbohydrate intake recommended by ASPEN and ESPEN, for which compliance was 8.3%. Lower gestational age and birth weight were correlated with longer duration of parenteral nutrition (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: A lower gestational age and birth weight are related to a longer duration of parenteral nutrition. The results of this study demonstrate the importance of developing and evaluating protocols in clinical practice.

Stability and compatibility of ondansetron with haloperidol in parenteral admixtures.

BACKGROUND: The chemical stability of coadministered ondansetron (OND) and haloperidol (HAL) in parenteral admixtures has not been described yet. OBJECTIVE: The aim of the present work is to study the chemical stability and the compatibility of OND and HAL admixtures. METHODS: Normal saline solution and dextrose were used to prepare the admixture solutions of the drugs; the materials of the containers were the original plastic bags of the diluents and the stability was studied at 20°C. Compatibility was studied by visual inspection of no colour change and turbidity or precipitation appearance. The concentration of the drugs was studied by ultraviolet detection high-performance liquid chromatography. The method was validated following the Food and Drug Administration and European Medicines Agency guidelines, and the assay enables the measurement of both drugs with a linear calibration curve (r=0.999) over the concentration range 10-100 µg/mL, with acceptable values of linearity, precision and accuracy. Darunavir was used as internal standard. RESULTS: Most of the admixtures have an adequate concentration until 24 hours(less than 10% of loss). 25% of the samples show a higher loss at 24 hours, and the chemical stability of these samples is 12 hours. CONCLUSIONS: The stability and compatibility of OND and HAL in the coadministered admixtures in Viaflo plastic bags with normal saline or dextrose are suggested at 12 hours.

Pharmacokinetic monitoring of chronic treatment with digoxin from Primary Health Care / Seguimiento farmacocinético del tratamiento crónico con digoxina desde Atención Primaria

Objective: To assess the pharmacokinetic monitoring of SDC performed from primary healthcare (PH) in patients with chronic treatment. Methods: Cross-sectional retrospective study of patients with chronic treatment with digoxin belonging to the department of a General University Hospital. Data were analized: age, sex, diagnosis, number of serum digoxin concentration determinations, date and origin of the request for monitoring, analytical result and pharmacokinetic assessment are collected. Results: 624 patients are undergoing chronic treatment with digoxin, 68% women, mean age 78.4 (39-98) years. 308 (49.4%) patients haven’t analytical determination of SDC (Group 1), 183 (29.3%) patients have a SDC occasionally performed with a request from specialist care (Group 2) and 133 (21,3%) patients have CSD performed with a request from primary healthcare doctors, with an average of 2.42 monitoring per patient and year (Group 3). These are those patients who have pharmacokinetic monitoring of chronic treatment with digoxin. Of the group 2.25 (13.6%) patientes were hospital admission from emergency department for presenting digitalis intoxication with CSD>2 ng/ml, and 39 (21.3%) patients for low dosing with CSD (AU)

Objetivo: Evaluar el seguimiento farmacocinético de las CSD que se realiza desde Atención Primaria (AP) en pacientes con tratamiento crónico. Métodos: Estudio trasversal observacional retrospectivo de pacientes en tratamiento crónico con digoxina que pertenecen al departamento de un Hospital General Universitario. Se recogen datos de edad, sexo, diagnóstico, número de determinaciones séricas de digoxina realizadas, fecha y origen de la solicitud de monitorización, resultado analítico y valoración farmacocinética. (Infradosificación, normodosificación o supradosificación). Resultados: 624 pacientes están en tratamiento crónico con digoxina: 68% mujeres, edad media 78,4 (39-98) años. 308 (49,4%) pacientes no tienen realizada ninguna determinación analítica de CSD (Grupo 1), 183 (29,3%) pacientes tienen CSD realizadas de manera esporádica con solicitud tramitada desde Atención Especializada (Grupo 2) y 133 (21,3%) pacientes tienen CSD realizadas de manera periódica con solicitud cursada por médicos de AP, con un promedio de 2,42 monitorizaciones por paciente y año (Grupo 3). Estos son los que tienen un seguimiento farmacocinético del tratamiento crónico con digoxina. Del Grupo 2,25(13,6%) entran por el Servicio de Urgencias por presentar intoxicación digitálica con CSD>2 ng/ml, y 39 (21,3%) pacientes por baja dosificación con CSD (AU)

Pharmacokinetic monitoring of chronic treatment with digoxin from Primary Health Care.

INTRODUCTION: The serum digoxin concentration (SDC) should be between 0.8 and 2 ng/ml. The objective is to assess the pharmacokinetic monitoring of SDC performed from primary healthcare (PH) in patients with chronic treatment. METHODS: Cross-sectional retrospective study of patients with chronic treatment with digoxin belonging to the department of a General University Hospital.Data were analized: age, sex, diagnosis, number of serum digoxin concentration determinations, date and origin of the request for monitoring, analytical result and pharmacokinetic assessment are collected. RESULTS: 624 patients are undergoing chronic treatment with digoxin, 68% women, mean age 78.4 (39-98) years. 308 (49.4%) patients haven't analytical determination of SDC (Group 1), 183 (29.3%) patients have a SDC occasionally performed with a request from specialist care (Group 2) and 133 (21,3%) patients have CSD performed with a request from primary healthcare doctors, with an average of 2.42 monitoring per patient and year (Group 3). These are those patients who have pharmacokinetic monitoring of chronic treatment with digoxin. Of the group 2.25 (13.6%) patientes were hospital admission from emergency department for presenting digitalis intoxication with CSD>2 ng/ml, and 39 (21.3%) patients for low dosing with CSD<0.5 ng/ml. Group 3.4 (3%) patients presented digitalis intoxication and 5 (3.8%) for insufficient dosing. CONCLUSIONS: A small proportion of patients undergoing chronic treatment with digoxin are under pharmacokinetic monitoring and a reduction in complications derived from inappropriate CSD compared to those not under pharmacokinetic follow-up is observed.

Introducción: La concentración sérica de digoxina (CSD) debe situarse entre 0,8 y 2 ng/ml. El objetivo es valuar el seguimiento farmacocinético de las CSD que se realiza desde Atención Primaria (AP) en pacientes con tratamiento crónico.Métodos: Estudio trasversal observacional retrospectivo de pacientes en tratamiento crónico con digoxina que pertenecen al departamento de un Hospital General Universitario. Se recogen datos de edad, sexo, diagnóstico, número de determinaciones séricas de digoxina realizadas, fecha y origen de la solicitud de monitorización, resultado analítico y valoración farmacocinética. (Infradosificación, normodosificación o supradosificación).Resultados: 624 pacientes están en tratamiento crónico con digoxina: 68% mujeres, edad media 78,4 (39-98) años. 308 (49,4%) pacientes no tienen realizada ninguna determinación analítica de CSD (Grupo 1), 183 (29,3%) pacientes tienen CSD realizadas de manera esporádica con solicitud tramitada desde Atención Especializada (Grupo 2) y 133 (21,3%) pacientes tienen CSD realizadas de manera periódica con solicitud cursada por médicos de AP, con un promedio de 2,42 monitorizaciones por paciente y año (Grupo 3). Estos son los que tienen un seguimiento farmacocinético del tratamiento crónico con digoxina.Del Grupo 2,2(13,6%) entran por el Servicio de Urgencias por presentar intoxicación digitálica con CSD>2 ng/ml, y 39 (21,3%) pacientes por baja dosificación con CSD<0,5ng/ml. Del Grupo 3,4 (3%) presentan intoxicación digitálica y 5 (3,8%) infradosificación.Conclusiones: Una pequeña parte de los pacientes que se encuentran en tratamiento crónico con digoxina están en seguimiento farmacocinético. Se observa una reducción de las complicaciones derivadas de CSD inapropiadas con respecto a los que no están en seguimiento farmacocinético.

Administración de medicamentos por vía subcutánea en cuidados paliativos / Subcutaneous drug administration in palliative care

Objetivo: Elaborar una guía que recopile toda la información disponible en la bibliografía para el personal sanitario sobre la administración de medicamentos por vía subcutánea en pacientes de cuidados paliativos de la Unidad de Hospitalización a Domicilio. Método: Se diseña una tabla resumen de fármacos susceptibles de ser administrados por vía subcutánea en pacientes de cuidados paliativos mediante la revisión de los informes técnicos de los laboratorios fabricantes y de otra literatura publicada por organizaciones científicas, además de la búsqueda bibliográfica en Pubmed® y Micromedex®. Resultados: Se han revisado 65 fármacos y se ha elaborado una guía de recomendaciones en función de si existe información de su administración por vía subcutánea o, si por el contrario, esta contraindicado su uso. Conclusiones: Aunque mayoritariamente los laboratorios fabricantes no disponen de datos, la información recopilada en esta guía permitirá el manejo de la vía subcutánea de algunos de los medicamentos más utilizados en cuidados paliativos (AU)

Objective: Develop a guide that compiles all the information available in the literature for healthcare staff on the administration of drugs subcutaneously in palliative care patients of the Hospital Unit of home. Method: It is designed a summary table of drugs likely to be administered subcutaneously in palliative care patients through the revision of the technical reports of the manufacturers and other literature published by scientific organizations, in addition to the literature search on Pubmed® and Micromedex®. Results: We have reviewed 65 drugs and a guide has been developed of recommendations depending on whether there is information of his administration by subcutaneous or, if on the contrary, its use is contraindicated. Conclusions: Although mainly manufacturers laboratories do not have data, information collected in this guide will allow the management of the subcutaneous route of some of the most commonly used medications in palliative care (AU)

[Subcutaneous drug administration in palliative care]. / Administración de medicamentos por vía subcutánea en cuidados paliativos.

OBJECTIVE: Develop a guide that compiles all the information available in the literature for healthcare staff on the administration of drugs subcutaneously in palliative care patients of the Hospital Unit of home. METHOD: It is designed a summary table of drugs likely to be administered subcutaneously in palliative care patients through the revision of the technical reports of the manufacturers and other literature published by scientific organizations, in addition to the literature search on Pubmed® and Micromedex®. RESULTS: We have reviewed 65 drugs and a guide has been developed of recommendations depending on whether there is information of his administration by subcutaneous or, if on the contrary, its use is contraindicated. CONCLUSIONS: Although mainly manufacturers laboratories do not have data, information collected in this guide will allow the management of the subcutaneous route of some of the most commonly used medications in palliative care.

Objetivo: Elaborar una guía que recopile toda la información disponible en la bibliografía para el personal sanitario sobre la administración de medicamentos por vía subcutánea en pacientes de cuidados paliativos de la Unidad de Hospitalización a Domicilio. Método: Se diseña una tabla resumen de fármacos susceptibles de ser administrados por vía subcutánea en pacientes de cuidados paliativos mediante la revisión de los informes técnicos de los laboratorios fabricantes y de otra literatura publicada por organizaciones científicas, además de la búsqueda bibliográfica en Pubmed® y Micromedex®. Resultados: Se han revisado 65 fármacos y se ha elaborado una guía de recomendaciones en función de si existe información de su administración por vía subcutánea o, si por el contrario, esta contraindicado su uso. Conclusiones: Aunque mayoritariamente los laboratorios fabricantes no disponen de datos, la información recopilada en esta guía permitirá el manejo de la vía subcutánea de algunos de los medicamentos más utilizados en cuidados paliativos.