ABSTRACT
The aim was to systematically synthesize the current research and influence of artificial intelligence (AI) models on temporomandibular joint (TMJ) osteoarthritis (OA) diagnosis using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) or panoramic radiography. Seven databases (PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, LILACS, ProQuest, and SpringerLink) were searched for TMJ OA and AI articles. We used QUADAS-2 to assess the risk of bias, while with MI-CLAIM we checked the minimum information about clinical artificial intelligence modeling. Two hundred and three records were identified, out of which seven were included, amounting to 10,077 TMJ images. Three studies focused on the diagnosis of TMJ OA using panoramic radiography with various transfer learning models (ResNet model) on which the meta-analysis was performed. The pooled sensitivity was 0.76 (95% CI 0.35-0.95) and the specificity was 0.79 (95% CI 0.75-0.83). The other studies investigated the 3D shape of the condyle and disease classification observed on CBCT images, as well as the numerous radiomics features that can be combined with clinical and proteomic data to investigate the most effective models and promising features for the diagnosis of TMJ OA. The accuracy of the methods was nearly equivalent; it was higher when the indeterminate diagnosis was excluded or when fine-tuning was used.
ABSTRACT
This study aimed at performing a systematic review of the literature on the application of artificial intelligence (AI) in dental and maxillofacial cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) and providing comprehensive descriptions of current technical innovations to assist future researchers and dental professionals. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Protocols (PRISMA) Statement was followed. The study's protocol was prospectively registered. Following databases were searched, based on MeSH and Emtree terms: PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase and Web of Science. The search strategy enrolled 1473 articles. 59 publications were included, which assessed the use of AI on CBCT images in dentistry. According to the PROBAST guidelines for study design, seven papers reported only external validation and 11 reported both model building and validation on an external dataset. 40 studies focused exclusively on model development. The AI models employed mainly used deep learning models (42 studies), while other 17 papers used conventional approaches, such as statistical-shape and active shape models, and traditional machine learning methods, such as thresholding-based methods, support vector machines, k-nearest neighbors, decision trees, and random forests. Supervised or semi-supervised learning was utilized in the majority (96.62%) of studies, and unsupervised learning was used in two (3.38%). 52 publications included studies had a high risk of bias (ROB), two papers had a low ROB, and four papers had an unclear rating. Applications based on AI have the potential to improve oral healthcare quality, promote personalized, predictive, preventative, and participatory dentistry, and expedite dental procedures.
