Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 86
Filter
1.
Ir J Psychol Med ; : 1-7, 2022 May 16.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35575056

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION AND AIMS: Objective structured clinical examinations (OSCEs) play a pivotal role in medical education assessment. The Advanced Clinical Skills (ACS) OSCE examines clinical skills in psychiatry, general practice, obstetrics and gynaecology and paediatrics. This study examined if the 2020 ACS OSCE for fourth year medical students attending the National University of Ireland, Galway, was associated with any significant result differences compared to the equivalent 2019 OSCE. Additionally, we assessed students' satisfaction and explored any organisational difficulties in conducting a face-to-face OSCE during the COVID-19 pandemic. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study compared anonymised data between the 2019 and 2020 ACS OSCEs and analysed anonymised student feedback pertaining to the modified 2020 OSCE. RESULTS: The mean total ACS OSCE result achieved in 2020 was statistically higher compared to the 2019 OSCE [62.95% (SD = 6.21) v. 59.35% (SD = 5.54), t = 6.092, p < 0.01], with higher marks noted in psychiatry (p = 0.001), paediatrics (p = 0.001) and general practice (p < 0.001) with more students attaining honours grades (χ2 = 27.257, df = 3, p < 0.001). No difference in failure rates were found. Students reported feeling safe performing the 2020 OSCE (89.2%), but some expressed face-mask wearing impeded their communication skills (47.8%). CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates that conducting a face-to-face OSCE during the pandemic is feasible and associated with positive student feedback. Exam validity has been demonstrated as there was no difference in the overall pass rate.

3.
Eur J Oncol Nurs ; 54: 102015, 2021 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34500319

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Oral anti-cancer medication (OAM) has revolutionised oncology care. Due to their potential toxicities and associated safety challenges ongoing assessment and monitoring is essential; currently generally performed in acute care settings. Internationally there exists a transformative vision to shift patient care from acute to primary care. A nurse-led integrated model of care could be developed for OAM patient management in primary care. The aim of this study was to examine international literature regarding current clinical management practices for assessment and monitoring of patients receiving OAM. METHODS: Following PRISMA-ScR guidelines, databases MEDLINE, CINAHL and Web of Science were searched for English studies published between 2010 and 2020 using keywords: assessment, cancer, care, management, oral anticancer medications. Articles were screened and assessed for eligibility. From eligible studies, data were extracted to summarize, collate and make a narrative account of the findings. RESULTS: 2261 papers were reviewed, 14 met inclusion criteria. Three phases of management are reported: 1. Patient treatment plan development; 2. Patient education; 3. Patient monitoring. Within these phases seven specific stages of care were identified broadly representing the patient's journey: (1) treatment decision, (2) prescribing of OAM, (3) OAM dispensing and administration, (4) maximising patient safety (5) ongoing patient assessment (6) patient support (7) communication with other health-care professionals. CONCLUSIONS: Despite a paucity of international literature, a dedicated OAM clinic was endorsed as a means to achieve improved care. Nurses and pharmacists were identified as being of particular importance especially in education and ongoing management of patients receiving OAMs.


Subject(s)
Mouth Neoplasms , Pharmacists , Administration, Oral , Adult , Delivery of Health Care , Humans , Patient Safety
4.
BMC Med Educ ; 18(1): 162, 2018 07 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29976194

ABSTRACT

Following publication of the original article [1], the author report typographical errors in the.

5.
BMC Med Educ ; 18(1): 139, 2018 Jun 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29907112

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this paper is to systematically review the literature with respect to stakeholder views of selection methods for medical school admissions. METHODS: An electronic search of nine databases was conducted between January 2000-July 2014. Two reviewers independently assessed all titles (n = 1017) and retained abstracts (n = 233) for relevance. Methodological quality of quantitative papers was assessed using the MERSQI instrument. The overall quality of evidence in this field was low. Evidence was synthesised in a narrative review. RESULTS: Applicants support interviews, and multiple mini interviews (MMIs). There is emerging evidence that situational judgement tests (SJTs) and selection centres (SCs) are also well regarded, but aptitude tests less so. Selectors endorse the use of interviews in general and in particular MMIs judging them to be fair, relevant and appropriate, with emerging evidence of similarly positive reactions to SCs. Aptitude tests and academic records were valued in decisions of whom to call to interview. Medical students prefer interviews based selection to cognitive aptitude tests. They are unconvinced about the transparency and veracity of written applications. Perceptions of organisational justice, which describe views of fairness in organisational processes, appear to be highly influential on stakeholders' views of the acceptability of selection methods. In particular procedural justice (perceived fairness of selection tools in terms of job relevance and characteristics of the test) and distributive justice (perceived fairness of selection outcomes in terms of equal opportunity and equity), appear to be important considerations when deciding on acceptability of selection methods. There were significant gaps with respect to both key stakeholder groups and the range of selection tools assessed. CONCLUSIONS: Notwithstanding the observed limitations in the quality of research in this field, there appears to be broad concordance of views on the various selection methods, across the diverse stakeholders groups. This review highlights the need for better standards, more appropriate methodologies and for broadening the scope of stakeholder research.


Subject(s)
School Admission Criteria , Schools, Medical/standards , Academic Performance , Aptitude Tests , Decision Making, Organizational , Faculty, Medical , Humans , Interviews as Topic , Judgment , Reproducibility of Results , Students, Medical/psychology
6.
Ir J Med Sci ; 186(2): 447-453, 2017 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26803315

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Burnout constitutes a significant problem among physicians which impacts negatively upon both the doctor and their patients. Previous research has indicated that burnout is prevalent among primary care physicians in other European countries and North America. However, there is a paucity of research assessing burnout among Irish general practitioners and examining predictive factors. AIMS: To report the findings of a survey of burnout among Irish general practitioners, and assess variables related to burnout in this population. METHODS: An online, anonymous questionnaire was distributed to general practitioners working in the Republic of Ireland. RESULTS: In total, 683 general practitioners (27.3 % of practising Irish general practitioners) completed the survey. Of these, 52.7 % reported high levels of emotional exhaustion, 31.6 % scored high on depersonalisation and 16.3 % presented with low levels of personal accomplishment. In total, 6.6 % presented with all three symptoms, fulfilling the criteria for burnout. Emotional exhaustion was higher among this sample than that reported in European and UK studies of burnout in general practitioners. Personal accomplishment was, however, higher in this sample than in other studies. Multiple regression analyses revealed that younger age, non-principal status role, and male gender were related to increased risk of burnout symptoms. CONCLUSIONS: The symptoms of burnout appear prevalent among Irish general practitioners. This is likely to have a detrimental impact both upon the individual general practitioners and the patients that they serve. Research investigating the factors contributing to burnout in this population, and evaluating interventions to improve general practitioner well-being, is, therefore, essential.


Subject(s)
Burnout, Professional/epidemiology , Depersonalization/epidemiology , General Practitioners/statistics & numerical data , Adult , Aged , Burnout, Professional/psychology , Cross-Sectional Studies , Emotions , Fatigue/epidemiology , Female , Humans , Ireland/epidemiology , Male , Middle Aged , Prevalence , Surveys and Questionnaires
7.
Ir Med J ; 109(5): 412, 2016 May 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27685883

ABSTRACT

In Ireland, there is a critical shortage in the supply of general practitioners that is projected to worsen. One possible response is to attempt to increase medical student interest in pursuing a career in general practice. Our study aimed to describe the challenges that medical students and general practitioners perceive in the field of general practice. A cross-sectional online survey of 96 medical students (10.5% response rate) enrolled at the National University of Ireland, Galway and 35 general practitioners (24.6% response rate) who attended the Vasco da Gama Movement (VdGM) Forum in February 2015. VdGM is the WONCA Europe Network for new and future general practitioner. The most commonly perceived challenges included remuneration, stress, access to imaging, respect from fellow medical professionals, treating the ageing population, and complexity of patients. These challenges were also generally rated as of high priority. There was large congruence between students and practitioners as to the challenges and what priority they represented. Of medical student participants, 18% indicated that general practice was their career of choice. Medical students and general practitioner have identified several challenges in the Irish general practice setting. Addressing these concerns is crucial to attract and retain future general practitioners.

8.
BMJ Open ; 5(11): e007807, 2015 Nov 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26534729

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To determine the long-term effectiveness of a complex intervention in primary care aimed at improving outcomes for patients with coronary heart disease. DESIGN: A 6-year follow-up of a cluster randomised controlled trial, which found after 18 months that both total and cardiovascular hospital admissions were significantly reduced in intervention practices (8% absolute reduction). SETTING: 48 general practices in the Republic of Ireland and Northern Ireland. PARTICIPANTS: 903 patients with established coronary heart disease at baseline in the original trial. INTERVENTION: The original intervention consisted of tailored practice and patient plans; training sessions for practitioners in medication prescribing and behavioural change; and regular patient recall system. Control practices provided usual care. Following the intervention period, all supports from the research team to intervention practices ceased. PRIMARY OUTCOME: hospital admissions, all cause and cardiovascular; secondary outcomes: mortality; blood pressure and cholesterol control. RESULTS: At 6-year follow-up, data were collected from practice records of 696 patients (77%). For those who had died, we censored their data at the point of death and cause of death was established. There were no significant differences between the intervention and control practices in either total (OR 0.83 (95% CI 0.54 to 1.28)) or cardiovascular hospital admissions (OR 0.91 (95% CI 0.49 to 1.65)). We confirmed mortality status of 886 of the original 903 patients (98%). There were no significant differences in mortality (15% in intervention and 16% in control) or in the proportions of patients above target control for systolic blood pressure or total cholesterol. CONCLUSIONS: Initial significant differences in the numbers of total and cardiovascular hospital admissions were not maintained at 6 years and no differences were found in mortality or blood pressure and cholesterol control. Policymakers need to continue to assess the effectiveness of previously efficacious programmes. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN24081411.


Subject(s)
Coronary Disease/prevention & control , General Practice , Secondary Prevention , Coronary Disease/complications , Coronary Disease/mortality , Follow-Up Studies , Hospitalization , Humans , Hypercholesterolemia/complications , Hypercholesterolemia/prevention & control , Hypertension/complications , Hypertension/prevention & control , Ireland , Northern Ireland , Outcome Assessment, Health Care
9.
Ir Med J ; 108(7): 204-7, 2015.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26349349

ABSTRACT

Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is the leading cause of death worldwide. This study aimed to benchmark awareness and use of CVD risk assessment (RA) tools and prevention guidelines in Irish general practice. 493 (18%) Irish general practitioners (GPs) were invited to participate in a cross-sectional study in 2011. 213 (43%) GPs responded with most being male (n = 128, 58.2%) and aged ≥ 45 years (n = 124, 56.8%). While 197 (92.5%) GPs were aware of at least one RA tool, only 69 (32.4%) GPs reported frequent use. 187 (87.8%) GPs were aware of one or more CVD prevention guidelines with 115 (54.0%) GPs reporting frequent use of at least one guideline. No age or gender difference observed. Barriers to implementation of CVD prevention guidelines were lack of remuneration, too many CVD guidelines and time constraints. Most Irish GPs were aware of RA tools and CVD prevention guidelines with half reporting frequent use of guidelines.


Subject(s)
Attitude of Health Personnel , Cardiovascular Diseases/prevention & control , General Practitioners , Primary Prevention , Risk Assessment/methods , Benchmarking/methods , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , General Practitioners/psychology , General Practitioners/standards , Guideline Adherence/statistics & numerical data , Health Care Surveys , Humans , Ireland , Male , Middle Aged , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Primary Prevention/methods , Primary Prevention/organization & administration , Risk Factors
10.
Resuscitation ; 91: 42-7, 2015 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25818707

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: More than a third of Ireland's population lives in a rural area, defined as the population residing in all areas outside clusters of 1500 or more inhabitants. This presents a challenge for the provision of effective pre-hospital resuscitation services. In 2012, Ireland became one of three European countries with nationwide Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest (OHCA) register coverage. An OHCA register provides an ability to monitor quality and equity of access to life-saving services in Irish communities. AIM: To use the first year of national OHCAR data to assess differences in the occurrence, incidence and outcomes of OHCA where resuscitation is attempted and the incident is attended by statutory Emergency Medical Services between rural and urban settings. METHODS: The geographical coordinates of incident locations were identified and co-ordinates were then classified as 'urban' or 'rural' according to the Irish Central Statistics Office (CSO) definition. RESULTS: 1798 OHCA incidents were recorded which were attended by statutory Emergency Medical Services (EMS) and where resuscitation was attempted. There was a higher percentage of male patients in rural settings (71% vs. 65%; p = 0.009) but the incidence of male patients did not differ significantly between urban and rural settings (26 vs. 25 males/100,000 population/year p = 0.353). A higher proportion of rural patients received bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation (B-CPR) 70% vs. 55% (p ≤ 0.001), and had defibrillation attempted before statutory EMS arrival (7% vs. 4% (p = 0.019), respectively). Urban patients were more likely to receive a statutory EMS response in 8 min or less (33% vs. 9%; p ≤ 0.001). Urban patients were also more likely to be discharged alive from hospital (6% vs. 3%; p = 0.006) (incidence 2.5 vs. 1.1/100,000 population/year; p ≤ 0.001). Multivariable analysis of survival showed that the main variable of interest i.e. urban vs. rural setting was also independently associated with discharge from hospital alive (OR 3.23 (95% CI 1.43-7.31)). CONCLUSION: There are significant disparities in the incidence of resuscitation attempts in urban and rural areas. There are challenges in the provision of services and subsequent outcomes from OHCA that occur outside of urban areas requiring novel and innovative solutions. An integrated community response system is necessary to improve metrics around OHCA response and outcomes in rural areas.


Subject(s)
Emergency Medical Services/statistics & numerical data , Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest/epidemiology , Resuscitation/statistics & numerical data , Aged , Female , Humans , Incidence , Ireland/epidemiology , Male , Middle Aged , Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest/mortality , Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest/therapy , Prognosis , Resuscitation/methods , Rural Population , Survival Analysis , Urban Population
11.
Ir Med J ; 107(7): 210-2, 2014.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25226716

ABSTRACT

Multiple Mini Interview (MMI) is a new selection tool for medical school applicants. Developed at McMaster University in 2004 it comprises a series of interview stations designed to measure performance across a range of competencies including communication skills, team work, and ethical reasoning. In September 2012, 109 First Year Medical students underwent the MMI. It consisted of 10 stations. The median total score, out of 150, was 100 (min 63, max 129). Cronbach Alphas for the 10 individual stations range from 0.74 to 0.80. Overall Cronbach Alpha of MMI items was 0.78. Staff and student feedback was positive. The outline cost per student was estimated at Euro 145. This study demonstrates that it is feasible to hold a MMI with acceptable levels of reliability and stakeholder approval in an Irish setting. Further work is ongoing to establish the concurrent and predictive validity of MMI in this cohort of medica students.


Subject(s)
Educational Measurement/methods , Interviews as Topic/methods , School Admission Criteria , Schools, Medical/organization & administration , Schools, Medical/standards , Feasibility Studies , Female , Humans , Ireland , Male
13.
Fam Pract ; 30(1): 105-12, 2013 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22850249

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: National policies are being developed, which may limit access to patients' records for health research. This could reduce the ability of health research to benefit society as a whole. It is important to develop an in-depth understanding of people's views across demographic groups to inform such policy development. Aims. To explore patients' views about the use of their general practice records in health research with attention to gender and age. Design of study. Qualitative study using focus groups. SETTING: Six General Practices in the west of Ireland. METHOD: Focus Group interviews with 35 people who were patients at the practices. RESULTS: Overall, participants were positively inclined towards the idea of information from their records (anonymous and identifiable) being used in research for the 'greater good' although there were some concerns about personal information being 'leaked'. Males emphasized risks in relation to employment and finances, whereas females emphasized risks in relation to social discomfort and embarrassment. Participants were supportive of consent models that enable patients to give prior ongoing consent for specific agreed 'levels' of data use, affording patients self-determination without the need for consent request on study-by-study basis. CONCLUSION: Overall male and female patients of different ages are supportive of the use of their general practice records in health research and of general practitioners as data protectors.


Subject(s)
Attitude , Biomedical Research , Confidentiality , Health Records, Personal , Patients/psychology , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Female , Focus Groups , General Practice , Humans , Ireland , Male , Middle Aged , Qualitative Research , Records , Young Adult
14.
Ir Med J ; 106(10): 302-5, 2013.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24579409

ABSTRACT

We established a national audit to assess the thromboprophylaxis rate for venous thromoembolism (VTE) in at risk medical patients in acute hospitals in the Republic of Ireland and to determine whether the use of stickers to alert physicians regarding thromboprophylaxis would double the rate prophylaxis in a follow-up audit. 651 acute medical admission patients in the first audit and 524 in the second re-audit were recruited. The mean age was 66.5 yrs with similar numbers of male and female patients and 265 (22.6%) patients were active smokers. The first and second audits identified 549 (84%) and 487 (93%) of patients at-risk for VTE respectively. Of the at-risk patients, 163 (29.7%) and 132 (27.1%) received LMWH in the first and second audit respectively. Mechanical thromboprophylaxis was instigated in 75 (13.6%) patients in the first and 86 (17.7%) patients in the second audit. The placement of stickers in patient charts didn't produce a significant increase in the number of at risk patients treated in the second audit. There is unacceptably low adherence to the ACCP guidelines in Ireland and more complex intervention than chart reminders are required to improve compliance.


Subject(s)
Venous Thromboembolism/prevention & control , Aged , Female , Guideline Adherence , Humans , Ireland/epidemiology , Male , Medical Audit , Medical Staff, Hospital , Middle Aged , Practice Patterns, Physicians'/standards , Reminder Systems , Risk Assessment , Venous Thromboembolism/epidemiology
15.
Eur J Cardiovasc Nurs ; 10(2): 101-7, 2011 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20684891

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: While a healthy sexual life is regarded as an important aspect of quality of life, sexual counselling from healthcare providers for cardiac patients has received little attention in the literature. AIM: To document current practice and assess the needs of cardiac rehabilitation service providers in Ireland with regard to sexual assessment and management for patients. METHODS: Cardiac rehabilitation staff in all relevant centres in Ireland responded to a postal questionnaire. Sexual health management was assessed by a series of questions on current practice, staff attitudes, beliefs and perceived barriers to discussing sexual problems. RESULTS: Staff (N=60; 61% response rate) reported a lack of assessment and counselling protocols for addressing sexual health problems, with little or no onward referral system available. Results also suggest staff believe that patients do not expect them to ask about their sexual concerns. Barriers reported included an overall lack of confidence (45%), knowledge (58%) and training (85%). CONCLUSION: Development of guidelines, assessment protocols and training for cardiac rehabilitation staff are essential in the area of sexual health problems in order to improve the quality of services for patients with coronary heart disease.


Subject(s)
Attitude of Health Personnel , Coronary Disease/rehabilitation , Sex Counseling , Adult , Aged , Clinical Competence , Coronary Disease/complications , Coronary Disease/psychology , Female , Health Care Surveys , Humans , Ireland , Male , Middle Aged , Practice Patterns, Physicians' , Sexuality
16.
Vaccine ; 28(38): 6338-43, 2010 Aug 31.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20637302

ABSTRACT

The aim of this study was to investigate the uptake of the first dose of measles, mumps and rubella (MMR) vaccine and factors associated with not receiving this vaccine. A cross-generation cohort study was conducted with prospective linkage to primary care and hospital health records in urban and rural settings in Ireland 2001-2004. Seven hundred and forty-nine singleton children were included, with an MMR uptake of 88.7% by the age of 5 years. These data confirm prospectively for the first time that in addition to factors associated with disadvantage, other health practices and beliefs, particularly mother's complementary and alternative medicine use, are associated with decreased MMR uptake (adjusted OR 2.65 (1.76-3.98)). This information suggests that parental attitudes and beliefs regarding vaccines must be considered when developing programmes to improve immunisation uptake.


Subject(s)
Life Style , Measles-Mumps-Rubella Vaccine/administration & dosage , Mothers/psychology , Patient Acceptance of Health Care/statistics & numerical data , Vaccination/psychology , Adolescent , Adult , Child, Preschool , Cohort Studies , Female , Humans , Infant , Ireland , Male , Surveys and Questionnaires , Young Adult
17.
Arch Dis Child ; 95(8): 603-5, 2010 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20515962

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To determine if different factors affect children having full, partial or no primary immunisations. METHODS: This was a crossgenerational cohort study with linkage to primary care and hospital records conducted in urban and rural settings in Ireland, recruiting in 2001-2003 with 5-year follow-up. A total of 749 children with immunisation information took part. RESULTS: The uptake of reported primary immunisations was 92.8% full, 4.9% partial and 2.3% no primary immunisations. Adjusted relative risk ratios for children receiving no primary immunisations were significant for: having a mother who had ever visited an alternative practitioner 3.69 (1.05 to 12.9), a mother with means tested full general medical services eligibility 8.11 (1.58 to 41.65), a mother who scored <50 for the World Health Organization Quality of Life (WHO-QOL) scale psychological domain 8.82 (1.79 to 43.6) or living in the west of Ireland (rural) 3.64 (1.0 to 13.2). Being born prematurely was associated with partial primary immunisation, adjusted OR 4.63 (1.24 to 17.3). CONCLUSIONS: Knowledge of these differences will help target campaigns to increase full uptake of primary immunisations.


Subject(s)
Immunization/statistics & numerical data , Patient Acceptance of Health Care/statistics & numerical data , Adult , Complementary Therapies/statistics & numerical data , Educational Status , Family Characteristics , Female , Humans , Infant, Newborn , Infant, Premature , Ireland , Male , Medical Record Linkage , Rural Health/statistics & numerical data , Urban Health/statistics & numerical data
18.
Ir Med J ; 102(9): 285-8, 2009 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19902646

ABSTRACT

There is little prevalence data for chronic kidney disease (CKD) in Ireland and it has been suggested that rates of diagnosis of CKD in primary care are low. The aim of this cross sectional study was to examine the prevalence, diagnosis and standards of care for CKD. All patient records in three general practices in the West of Ireland were reviewed. In 2602 patients > 50 years in the community, 435 (16.7%) had chronic kidney disease defined as eGFR <60 ml/min/1.73 m2. Of these 435 individuals, only 58 (13.3%) had a diagnosis of CKD documented in their patient record. Among all patients with an eGFR <60 ml/min/1.73 m2, those with a documented diagnosis of CKD were significantly more likely to be prescribed an ACE/ARB and a lipid-lowering agent and were more likely to have had an ACR/PCR checked in the previous twelve months. Blood pressure was being appropriately monitored in the majority of patients but irrespective of eGFR level or a documented diagnosis of CKD, less than a fifth of patients had achieved a target of <130/80 mmHg. CKD is common in primary care but remains largely undiagnosed and blood pressure control remains suboptimal. A key step in improving care appears to be documenting the diagnosis which in turn appears to lead to improved standards of care and risk factor management.


Subject(s)
Kidney Failure, Chronic/epidemiology , Primary Health Care , Age Factors , Aged , Analysis of Variance , Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers/therapeutic use , Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Antihypertensive Agents/therapeutic use , Benchmarking , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Glomerular Filtration Rate , Humans , Ireland/epidemiology , Kidney Failure, Chronic/diagnosis , Male , Prevalence , Risk Factors
19.
BMJ ; 339: b4220, 2009 Oct 29.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19875426

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To test the effectiveness of a complex intervention designed, within a theoretical framework, to improve outcomes for patients with coronary heart disease. DESIGN: Cluster randomised controlled multicentre trial. SETTING: General practices in Northern Ireland and the Republic of Ireland, regions with different healthcare systems. PARTICIPANTS: 903 patients with established coronary heart disease registered with one of 48 practices. INTERVENTION: Tailored care plans for practices (practice based training in prescribing and behaviour change, administrative support, quarterly newsletter), and tailored care plans for patients (motivational interviewing, goal identification, and target setting for lifestyle change) with reviews every four months at the practices. Control practices provided usual care. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The proportion of patients at 18 month follow-up above target levels for blood pressure and total cholesterol concentration, and those admitted to hospital, and changes in physical and mental health status (SF-12). RESULTS: At baseline the numbers (proportions) of patients above the recommended limits were: systolic blood pressure greater than 140 mm Hg (305/899; 33.9%, 95% confidence interval 30.8% to 33.9%), diastolic blood pressure greater than 90 mm Hg (111/901; 12.3%, 10.2% to 14.5%), and total cholesterol concentration greater than 5 mmol/l (188/860; 20.8%, 19.1% to 24.6%). At the 18 month follow-up there were no significant differences between intervention and control groups in the numbers (proportions) of patients above the recommended limits: systolic blood pressure, intervention 98/360 (27.2%) v control, 133/405 (32.8%), odds ratio 1.51 (95% confidence interval 0.99 to 2.30; P=0.06); diastolic blood pressure, intervention 32/360 (8.9%) v control, 40/405 (9.9%), 1.40 (0.75 to 2.64; P=0.29); and total cholesterol concentration, intervention 52/342 (15.2%) v control, 64/391 (16.4%), 1.13 (0.63 to 2.03; P=0.65). The number of patients admitted to hospital over the 18 month study period significantly decreased in the intervention group compared with the control group: 107/415 (25.8%) v 148/435 (34.0%), 1.56 (1.53 to 2.60; P=0.03). CONCLUSIONS: Admissions to hospital were significantly reduced after an intensive 18 month intervention to improve outcomes for patients with coronary heart disease, but no other clinical benefits were shown, possibly because of a ceiling effect related to improved management of the disease. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN24081411.


Subject(s)
Coronary Disease/prevention & control , Family Practice/organization & administration , Patient Care Planning/organization & administration , Aged , Blood Pressure/physiology , Cholesterol/blood , Coronary Disease/blood , Coronary Disease/physiopathology , Family Practice/statistics & numerical data , Female , Health Status , Hospitalization/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Hypercholesterolemia/prevention & control , Hypertension/prevention & control , Ireland , Life Style , Male , Mental Health , Northern Ireland , Patient Care Planning/statistics & numerical data
20.
Health Educ Res ; 24(3): 357-68, 2009 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18515814

ABSTRACT

Qualitative theories of illness experience are about the individual interpretations of the psychosocial and cultural aspects of living with illness. Thus, they contribute to a better understanding of health and health care provision. In this paper, we examine how a grounded theory (GT) of heart disease experience can inform secondary prevention. In-depth interviews of individual experience of heart disease were conducted with 26 patients, using GT iterative data collection and analysis framework. A GT was compiled from data and examined within a sociocultural framework to ascertain how experience influenced health behaviour. Despite individual contextual variations, the theory of 'keeping it going' describes the study sample's common attitude to living with heart disease. The theory was adequate in explaining secondary cardiac behaviour, because it identified the aspects of patients' beliefs and attitudes which are key to effective secondary prevention. The assessment of the impact of illness experience on health behaviour within a sociocultural framework helped to articulate the strong influence of social and contextual factors. The study offers an appropriate explanatory framework for encouraging health behaviour change. It emphasizes the importance of interventions being relevant to individual perceptions and interpretations. It provides a framework for designing and evaluating cardiac interventions and the theoretical principles which underpin them.


Subject(s)
Health Behavior , Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice , Heart Diseases/prevention & control , Heart Diseases/psychology , Models, Psychological , Aged , Female , Humans , Interviews as Topic , Male , Observer Variation , Qualitative Research , Socioeconomic Factors
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...