Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 1 de 1
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Dig Surg ; 34(3): 180-185, 2017.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27931029

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Until recently, a diagnosis of infected pancreatic necrosis (IPN) warranted necrosectomy, which was associated with high morbidity and mortality rates greater than 20%. Preoperative percutaneous drainage delayed the need for necrosectomy with improved outcomes. METHODS: In 2008, this institution changed its approach to the management of such cases opting instead for percutaneous drainage with selective deferred necrosectomy. A total of 38 consecutive patients with IPN from January 2008 to December 2014 were included. RESULTS: All 38 underwent percutaneous radiological drainage, and selective necrosectomy was performed on 15 where the infected necrosis did not completely resolve. Twenty-three patients did not require surgery and were managed with pancreatic drain insertion, optimal nutritional support and critical care interventions. Median peak Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation and Sequential Organ Failure Assessment scores were 10 (range 0-18) and 3 (range 0-10) prior to radiological intervention. Overall mortality was 5% (n = 2). CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates that radiological-guided drainage of infected pancreatic collections can, in most cases, prove curative and, if not, facilitates delayed surgical intervention with improved outcomes.


Subject(s)
Drainage , Pancreatitis, Acute Necrotizing/surgery , Patient Selection , APACHE , Adult , Aged , Drainage/adverse effects , Drainage/methods , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Necrosis/surgery , Pancreatitis, Acute Necrotizing/diagnosis , Pancreatitis, Acute Necrotizing/microbiology , Radiology, Interventional , Reoperation , Tomography, X-Ray Computed , Young Adult
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...