Facility- and community-based delivery of micronutrient powders in Uganda: Opening the black box of implementation using mixed methods.

Micronutrient powders (MNP) have the potential to increase micronutrient intake, yet documentation of implementation lessons remains a gap. This paper presents results of a pilot in Uganda comparing community- and facility-based delivery of MNP and documenting experiences of caregivers and distributors. The pilot's mixed method evaluation included a cross-sectional endline survey, monthly household visits, and midline and endline interviews. Primary outcomes were ever-covered (received ≥1 MNP packet), repeat-coverage (received ≥2 MNP packets), and adherence (consumed no more than 1 MNP sachet per day, consumed MNP with food, and consumed MNP 3+ days in past week). An adjusted Wald chi-square test compared differences in programme outcomes between arms, and logit regression identified predictors to adherence. Key informant interviews were coded thematically. Most programme outcomes in the endline survey were statistically significantly higher in the community arm, although in both arms, adherence was lower than other outcomes (adherence 31.4% in facility vs. 58.3% in community arm). Counselling, receipt of communication materials, perceived positive effects, MNP knowledge, and child liking MNP were consistent predictors of adherence in both arms. Qualitative findings corroborated survey results, revealing that social encouragement and advocacy facilitated use and that forgetting to give MNP was a barrier. Facility arm caregivers also cited distance, time, and transportation cost as barriers. Distributors had positive experiences with training and supervision but experienced increased workloads in both arms. MNP programme design is context-specific but could benefit from strengthened community sensitization, continued and more effective counselling for caregivers, and increased support for distributors.

Understanding the process of strengthening multi-sectoral efforts for anemia reduction: Qualitative findings from Sierra Leone and Uganda.

Anemia is a significant global health problem, and progress to reduce it has been slow. A multi-sectoral, context-specific, and country-led approach is recommended to effectively address anemia, but there is limited documentation of how this has worked in practice. We present key findings and lessons learned from Sierra Leone and Uganda's experiences establishing national-level anemia coordination platforms. A longitudinal collective case study methodology was used, with in-depth interviews of National Anemia Working Group members in both countries; data was analyzed to distill the salient lessons learned across countries. Similar factors were identified in the 2 countries. Setting the agenda was an important first step, accomplished by using country-specific anemia-related data and obtaining multi-sectoral commitment. Establishment of a cohesive coordination structure provided an effective platform to prioritize and align anemia activities. Strong, committed leadership and representation of diverse stakeholders was essential to maintain the legitimacy of anemia efforts. The main barriers to the policy-making process included misalignment of sectoral mandates, differences in work cultures, as well as competing priorities and increased staff workload. Sierra Leone and Uganda's experiences contribute to the global evidence base for anemia coordination and planning at the national level, particularly around linking health and non-health sectors and developing multi-sectoral platforms. It remains to be seen how and to what extent resulting policies in Sierra Leone and Uganda will translate to implementation.