Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 7 de 7
Filter
1.
J Pharm Pract ; 36(3): 620-627, 2023 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35200055

ABSTRACT

Background: Health literacy is defined as the degree to which individuals have the capacity to obtain, process and understand basic health information needed to make appropriate health decisions. A review of literature revealed few studies that examined pharmacist's knowledge of health literacy. Methods: The Pharmacist Professional Health Literacy Survey was distributed to a convenience sampling of community pharmacists in medically underserved counties of Southwest Georgia. Results: Of 75 pharmacists contacted, 39 completed the survey and were used in the evaluation. Most respondents reported no health literacy training and had never assessed health literacy with a validated questionnaire. More than half of the participants cited lack of knowledge about low health literacy as a major barrier to implementing health literacy screening for their patients. Time and cost were identified as major barriers to participating in health literacy training programs. Conclusion: Most pharmacists from this area had little exposure to evaluating health literacy. Pharmacy education postgraduate programs and continuing education training programs around this topic will heighten health literacy knowledge for the pharmacy profession. There is a need for a quick, easy to use, and effective tool for pharmacists to recognize and assess health literacy in patients.


Subject(s)
Community Pharmacy Services , Pharmaceutical Services , Pharmacies , Pharmacy , Humans , Pharmacists , Literacy , Surveys and Questionnaires , Attitude of Health Personnel , Professional Role
2.
Innov Pharm ; 12(2)2021.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34345504

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Budd Chiari Syndrome (BCS) is a very rare disease affecting approximately 1 in 100,000 people in the general population. It is caused by an obstruction of the hepatic veins leading to blood backing up in the liver. Treatment options to improve hepatic blood flow and relieve ascites are well documented. However, there are no established guidelines or treatment preferences for pain associated with BCS while patients are awaiting other treatment options. CASE: A 22-year-old African American female was diagnosed with Budd Chiari Syndrome. The initial attempt at a transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) procedure failed. While awaiting a second attempt at the procedure, the patient presented to her primary care provider complaining of abdominal and right upper quadrant pain. Treatment guidelines were searched for acute pain management options; however, no BCS pain management guidelines exist. DISCUSSION: Individuals with BCS often present with abdominal pain, however, no guidelines outlining analgesic options in BCS exists. Acetaminophen, NSAIDs, and opioids are commonly used prescription medications for moderate to severe pain. Acetaminophen use was not considered due to acute liver injury and portal venous thrombosis. Anticoagulation with apixaban prevented concurrent use with NSAIDs. Opioid medications combined with acetaminophen were excluded to minimize exacerbating the liver injury. Tramadol 25 mg was chosen due to its lower abuse profile than other opioid analgesics, and was initiated for pain management. CONCLUSION: The patient reported adequate pain control with tramadol, tolerated the medication with no complications, and underwent a successful TIPS procedure one month later.  Abdominal pain is a common symptom of BCS and needs to be effectively managed. Guidelines on treating pain associated with BCS in the outpatient setting would improve quality of life for patients and provide guidance to primary care providers requiring direction on how to address pain associated with Budd Chiari Syndrome safely and adequately.

4.
Consult Pharm ; 33(7): 365-375, 2018 Jul 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29996965

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To review and summarize studies on the changes in bone mineral density (BMD) and fracture risk following discontinuation of teriparatide therapy. DATA SOURCES: A search of PubMed (1966-May 2016) and International Pharmaceutical Abstracts (1970-May 2016) was conducted using the Medical Subject Headings terms teriparatide, osteoporosis, and withholding treatment. Free text searches included drug holiday, discontinuation, and drug discontinuation. STUDY SELECTION AND DATA EXTRACTION: These searches yielded 79 articles. There were 7 articles reviewed that addressed the effects of teriparatide discontinuation on markers of overall bone health and fracture risk. DATA SYNTHESIS: Teriparatide is a recombinant human parathyroid hormone that is indicated for a lifetime maximum of 24 months in the United States for the treatment of osteoporosis in men and women at high fracture risk. There is inconsistent evidence regarding retained skeletal integrity resulting from increased bone resorption. Study analyses have shown that female patients seem to have more reduction in BMD upon teriparatide discontinuation. Several studies evaluating teriparatide discontinuation were follow-up studies with small patient populations, limiting the generalizability and statistical rigor associated with assessing these outcomes. In addition, the majority of patients were receiving bisphosphonate therapy, and the true effect of discontinuing teriparatide remains unknown. CONCLUSION: Independent patient risk factors should be taken into consideration when weighing the risk-vs.-benefit of initiating and discontinuing teriparatide therapy. Additional randomized control trials should be conducted to determine long-term effects of discontinuing teriparatide in the presence and absence of other bone-strengthening agents.


Subject(s)
Bone Density Conservation Agents/therapeutic use , Fractures, Bone/prevention & control , Teriparatide/therapeutic use , Bone Density/drug effects , Fractures, Bone/etiology , Humans , Risk Factors , Teriparatide/adverse effects
5.
Consult Pharm ; 33(3): 142-151, 2018 Mar 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29720299

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To review and summarize studies on the effects of denosumab on bone mineral density following the discontinuation of therapy. DATA SOURCES: A search of PubMed (1966-July 2017) and International Pharmaceutical Abstracts (1970-July 2017) was conducted using the Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) terms denosumab, osteoporosis, and withholding treatment in combination with free term searches including the words drug holiday, discontinue, discontin*, and drug discontinuation. STUDY SELECTION AND DATA EXTRACTION: An initial review yielded 10 articles. Four articles that addressed the effects of denosumab discontinuation on markers of overall bone health, fracture risk, or bone histology were included in the final review. DATA SYNTHESIS: Denosumab is a monoclonal antibody indicated for the treatment of osteoporosis in men and postmenopausal women. Denosumab has proven beneficial effects on bone remodeling and bone mineral density, and these effects have been noted to be reversed upon treatment discontinuation because of the agent's lack of incorporation into bone matrix. After 12 to 24 months off denosumab therapy, BMD, BTMs levels, as well as histologic and histomorphometric analyses, were reflective of baseline values. The number of studies evaluating the residual skeletal effects of denosumab is limited, and the sample sizes in the articles reviewed were relatively small. CONCLUSION: An evaluation of studies showed that the discontinuation of denosumab results in loss of bone mineral density and a decline to near baseline values within 12 months of discontinuing therapy. Larger extension studies in a more diverse population need to be conducted to extrapolate the data to other patient groups.


Subject(s)
Bone Density Conservation Agents/administration & dosage , Denosumab/administration & dosage , Osteoporosis/drug therapy , Biomarkers/metabolism , Bone Density/drug effects , Bone Density Conservation Agents/pharmacology , Bone Remodeling/drug effects , Denosumab/pharmacology , Female , Humans , Male , Osteoporotic Fractures/prevention & control , Time Factors
6.
Consult Pharm ; 32(3): 144-155, 2017 Mar 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28270269

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effects on bone mineral density (BMD), bone turnover markers (BTMs), and fracture incidence following zoledronic acid (ZOL) discontinuation. DATA SOURCES: A search of PubMed (1966-May 2016) and International Pharmaceutical Abstracts (1970-May 2016) was conducted using the MeSH terms zoledronic acid, osteoporosis, and withholding treatment. Free text searches included drug holiday and drug discontinuation. STUDY SELECTION AND DATA EXTRACTION: An initial review yielded 87 articles. Six articles, which addressed the skeletal effects of ZOL after discontinuation of treatment, were included in the final review. DATA SYNTHESIS: ZOL is a widely prescribed bisphosphonate agent. Studies have shown that discontinuation of ZOL may have lasting skeletal benefits. However, there is inconsistent evidence regarding the duration of the residual skeletal effects of ZOL after treatment discontinuation, or the continued length of therapy required for the prolonged protective benefits on BMD and BTMs. Sample sizes have been small, and studies were not adequately powered to evaluate fracture incidence. CONCLUSION: A single ZOL infusion has been shown to decrease BTMs and improve BMD for at least 12 months after infusion. Patients may experience continued benefit beyond this period, but there is concern that this long-term effect may lead to severe bone-turnover suppression, increased bone fragility, and increased risk of fractures. Additional extension studies should be conducted to determine the long-term effects of discontinuing ZOL therapy on bone health as well as the length of preserved bone strength after last administration.


Subject(s)
Bone Density Conservation Agents/therapeutic use , Diphosphonates/therapeutic use , Imidazoles/therapeutic use , Osteoporosis/drug therapy , Osteoporotic Fractures/epidemiology , Biomarkers , Bone Density/drug effects , Bone Density Conservation Agents/administration & dosage , Bone Density Conservation Agents/adverse effects , Bone Remodeling/drug effects , Diphosphonates/administration & dosage , Diphosphonates/adverse effects , Humans , Imidazoles/administration & dosage , Imidazoles/adverse effects , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Zoledronic Acid
7.
Int J Chronic Dis ; 2016: 4304761, 2016.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27525302

ABSTRACT

Background. The Cardiovascular Risk Reduction Clinic (CRRC) in Perry County, Alabama, provides free pharmacist-led services. Clinic goals include improving health outcomes and reducing cardiovascular risk factors. Objective. To investigate the effectiveness of the CRRC in rural Perry County, Alabama. The reduction of the modifiable cardiovascular risk factors, blood pressure and body mass index, was evaluated to measure a decrease from baseline to last clinic date. Methods. This retrospective chart review identified 130 patients with at least two blood pressure and BMI measurements from baseline to June 30, 2010. The patients' paper files were used to collect baseline data and most recent measurements, which were recorded on a data collection sheet. Results. There was a statistically significant reduction in systolic blood pressure of 4.08 mmHg, 3.25 mmHg reduction in diastolic blood pressure, and 0.42 kg/m(2) reduction in mean BMI. At their last visit prior to June 30, 2010, 59% of hypertensive patients and 35% of diabetic patients were meeting their blood pressure goals. Conclusion. Pharmacist-led management of patients with cardiovascular risk factors significantly reduced blood pressure and allowed more patients to meet their hypertension treatment goals. Despite being modest, reductions in blood pressure and BMI help reduce overall cardiovascular risks.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...