Addressing Differences in Knowledge and Experience in Trauma Care Capabilities Among an International Team of Military Medical Care Providers in a Deployed Setting.

Military medical personnel are crucial in providing life-saving care at the point of injury (POI) in challenging environments such as combat zones and disaster areas. This article examines the specialized training US Military medical personnel undergo before deployment and the increasing trend of deploying as part of multinational forces in operations like those in Afghanistan with NATO and non-NATO countries. Integrating medical teams from diverse backgrounds poses significant challenges in maintaining a cohesive and efficient team due to varying trauma management training standards and medical practices among the allied forces. Tactical Combat Casualty Care (TCCC) training and the development of clinical practice guidelines (CPG) by the US Joint Trauma Service have been key strategies by the US Military to standardize care. However, the variation in trauma management training among NATO allies and the differences in medical subspecialties and approaches can lead to inefficiencies and reduced effectiveness in a multinational trauma center setting. For instance, the approach to trauma care can significantly differ between the US and European countries, impacting the interoperability and teamwork in multinational medical teams. To address these challenges, the article highlights the importance of standardized medical training programs that include cultural awareness to enhance the effectiveness of multidisciplinary, multinational medical teams. It also underscores the necessity for standardized international trauma training in the face of increasing global conflicts and the potential for large-scale combat operations. The article discusses the "Trauma Tuesday" program implemented in Kabul, Afghanistan, as an example of how intensive training and simulation exercises can improve team dynamics, knowledge, and skills in trauma management among a diverse team from various nations. The need for ongoing education and developing a standard for managing trauma patients in international teams is emphasized to ensure effective communication and coordination. The article suggests that multinational trauma training can significantly improve team cohesion and critical life-saving skills, essential for future battlefields where access to definitive care may be delayed. Further research is recommended to explore the best methods for achieving effective multinational medical team integration and training standardization.

Access to, Experience with, and Attitudes towards Take Home Naloxone: An Online Survey.

The opioid public health crisis continues to burden individuals, communities, and economies. Public health opinion has emphasized the need for increased access to harm reduction services, but there is a dearth of information on the views and experiences of people who use opioids. Our study aimed to investigate the prevalence of naloxone use, attitudes, and experiences with naloxone among an online community of people who use drugs. We performed a cross-sectional survey looking at experiences with and attitudes towards take-home naloxone. Data is presented descriptively, with analysis of the differences between people who do and do not use opioids using the χ2 and Fisher's exact tests. There were 1,143 respondents, of whom 70% were from the United States. Only 38% of participants who use opioids had received naloxone training, but 56% of these individuals said that they felt comfortable using a naloxone kit. Nearly all respondents (95%) said they would be willing to use naloxone on someone who had overdosed and approximately 90% would want naloxone used on them in case of an overdose. Regarding harm reduction, 24% of respondents said they had access to safe use programs, and 33% said they had access to clean needle exchange programs. A majority of the participants who use opioids were in favor of having naloxone with them when using drugs and believed naloxone should be freely available. This study demonstrates the receptiveness of take-home naloxone and highlights the need for better implementation of naloxone within communities that use opioids.

Hydrofluoric acid ingestions: Retrospective evaluations from cases reported to the National Poison Data System 2007-2017.

Background: Hydrofluoric acid (HF) is associated with systemic toxicity, particularly with high-concentration formulations. However, most existing data describe dermal exposures; there is a paucity of data related to outcomes after ingestions. Objective: To determine the morbidity and mortality associated with HF ingestions as reported to the National Poison Data System (NPDS). A secondary objective is to assess for clinical criteria that are associated with serious outcomes after HF ingestion. Methods: We performed a retrospective review of HF ingestions reported to the NPDS from 2007 to 2017. Data including patient demographics, exposure and caller sites, electrolyte abnormalities, treatments, and serious (moderate or major effect or death as documented in NPDS) and non-serious outcomes were abstracted from case narratives. Cases meeting the criteria for a qualifiable HF ingestion were included in the study. Results: During the study period, there were 653 HF ingestions reported to NPDS, of which 142 were included in the final data analysis. Most HF exposures occurred in men (68.3%), and the most common exposure site was at the exposed individual's own residence (78.2%). Nearly half of all exposures (46.5%) were due to transfer into a non-labeled secondary storage container. Total of 45.8% of the cases resulted in a serious outcome. Electrolyte disturbances were associated with an increased risk of a serious outcome. Hypocalcemia was the most frequently reported electrolyte abnormality, occurring in 24.6% of cases. Nine (6.3%) individuals died. Conclusions: Mortality after HF ingestion is low. However, a large cohort of exposures occurred after the transfer of HF to secondary containers. Targeted interventions to reduce this practice are necessary to decrease hazardous chemical exposures.

Emergency Department Presentation of Life-threatening Symptomatic Hyperkalemia From an Angiotensin Receptor Blocker in a Low-risk Individual.

Hyperkalemia is a common electrolyte abnormality with characteristic electrocardiogram changes. Both angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) and angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) increase the risk of developing hyperkalemia. This case highlights a rare life-threatening episode of hyperkalemia in an individual whose only risk factor was an ARB. A 58-year-old female presented with sudden-onset chest pressure, light-headedness, and diaphoresis. Her initial electrocardiogram showed a nearly sinusoidal rhythm with a widened ventricular depolarization (QRS) and prolonged QT-interval (QTc). Life-threatening hyperkalemia of 9.1 mmol/L was confirmed with a rapid point-of-care electrolyte panel. She was rapidly treated with calcium, potassium-shifting and eliminating medications, and emergent hemodialysis. After stabilization, a thorough workup found that the patient's only risk factor for hyperkalemia was her use of an ARB. While both ARBs and ACEIs are commonly associated with mild hyperkalemia, life-threatening hyperkalemia is rare, particularly in patients without concomitant renal failure, diabetes mellitus, adrenal disease, or potassium-sparing diuretic use. However, this case illustrates that life-threatening hyperkalemia is possible in patients solely taking an ARB without prior significant risk factors. Despite normal renal function in an individual without heart failure or diabetes, this patient developed life-threatening hyperkalemia.

Elevated methemoglobin levels in patients treated with hydroxocobalamin: a case series and in-vitro analysis.

BACKGROUND: Historically, the first step in treating cyanide (CN-) toxicity utilized antidotes to induce methemoglobinemia. This is concerning in patients who are already hypoxemic or have elevated carboxyhemoglobin. Hydroxocobalamin (OHCbl) is now the first-line antidote for CN- toxicity and is not known to induce methemoglobinemia. We observed elevated methemoglobin (MetHb) levels in several patients treated with OHCbl and sought to investigate the incidence of MetHb formation following administration of OHCbl. METHODS: Chart review: A single-center, retrospective case series of patients who received 5 or 10 g of hydroxocobalamin from 01/01/2011 through 04/30/2019. Data was analyzed using descriptive statistics. In-vitro study: Discarded blood was separated into whole blood and plasma samples. OHCbl and normal saline was added to reach 0×, 1×, 2×, and 4× peak therapeutic concentrations and analyzed at times 0, 2, and 4 h after administration. RESULTS: Chart review: Twenty-seven cases of OHCbl administration were identified. The median age was 53 years (IQR 38 - 64) and 20 (74.1%) were male. Exposure to a house fire or smoke inhalation was the reason for OHCbl administration in 21 (77.8%) patients. Five (18.5%) patients received 10 g of OHCbl while the rest received 5 g. Six (22.2%) patients developed methemoglobinemia, all after 5 g OHCbl administration; four had been exposed to fire and smoke, two received the medication for severe acidosis of unknown etiology not related to fire or smoke. The median peak level was 7.1% (IQR 2.2 - 16.4%) at a median time of 11.4 h post-administration. Two patients received methylene blue (MB), neither responded. Death occurred in 17 (63%) cases. In-vitro study: We observed a dose dependent elevation in total hemoglobin but did not detect any increase in MetHb. CONCLUSION: We observed a noteworthy temporal association between the formation of methemoglobinemia and the administration of hydroxocobalamin. This does not appear to be an artifact of the CO-oximeters. This could have profound implications for patients who are already hypoxemic or have impaired oxygen carrying capacity from carboxyhemoglobin.

Poisonings due to storage in a secondary container reported to the National Poison Data System, 2007-2017.

BACKGROUND: Transfer of xenobiotics from their original container to an unlabeled or secondary container is a well-identified risk factor for poisoning. Nonetheless, recent large-scale data on the practice are unavailable. The objective of this study is to describe the incidence and features of poisonings in the United States due to xenobiotics stored in a secondary container. METHODS: This was a retrospective review of the National Poison Data System (NPDS) from 2007 to 2017. Non-suicidal exposures associated with the scenario "container transfer involved (product transferred from original container to unlabeled container, incorrectly labeled container, or food container for use or storage and patient accessed product from second container)" were included. RESULTS: Forty-five thousand five hundred and twelve cases were included. The median age of subjects was 30 years (interquartile range: 6-53); 52% were female. Cleaning products (38.2%), disinfectants (17.3%), and hydrocarbons (5.0%) were the most common xenobiotics reported. The annual incidence of cases increased over the study period. There were 9369 (20.6%) ED visits and 1856 (4.1%) hospital admissions. Most cases (72%) were deemed nontoxic or resulted in no effects; 4.4% resulted in serious outcomes (moderate effects, major effects, or death), including 23 deaths. Morbidity was highest for pesticides, prescription medications, and herbicides, with 10.3%, 9.8%, and 7.6% of cases resulting in serious outcomes, respectively. Hydrofluoric acid and herbicides were associated with the most deaths (13/23 [57%]). CONCLUSIONS: Transfer of xenobiotics to a secondary container is a scenario increasingly reported to U.S. poison centers. Although most exposures do not result in significant toxicity, ED visits are common and substantial morbidity can occur. This represents an opportunity for public health intervention to curb the practice.

Elevated Methemoglobin Levels in a Patient Treated with Hydroxocobalamin After Suspected Cyanide Exposure.

BACKGROUND: Cyanide (CN) toxicity commonly occurs during enclosed-space fires. Historically, the first step in treating CN toxicity utilized amyl nitrite and sodium nitrite to induce methemoglobinemia, which can be dangerous in this population. Hydroxocobalamin (OHCob), which binds to CN to form the nontoxic metabolite cyanocobalamin, is now the first-line antidote for CN toxicity, and has the advantage of not inducing methemoglobinemia. CASE REPORT: A 62-year-old man presented to the Emergency Department (ED) after a house fire. He was intubated for respiratory distress and hypoxia with an initial carboxyhemoglobin of 1.3%, methemoglobin 0.3%, and anion gap 19. Eleven hours after presentation, his serum lactic acid was 9 mmol/L. Given his continued deterioration, 14 h after arrival he received OHCob 5 g i.v. for presumed CN toxicity. Methemoglobin concentration 4 min prior to OHCob administration was 0.7%, and 2 h after administration was 4.2%. This subsequently increased to 14.3% (16 h after OHCob administration) and peaked at 16.3% (47 h after OHCob administration), at which time he was administered a dose of methylene blue 50 mg i.v., 60 h after ED arrival. His methemoglobin concentrations fluctuated until a consistent downward trend starting at 92 h from ED arrival. He continued to deteriorate and expired on hospital day 5 with a methemoglobin concentration of approximately 6.0%. WHY SHOULD AN EMERGENCY PHYSICIAN BE AWARE OF THIS?: CN toxicity requires immediate recognition and treatment. The antidote, OHCob, is believed to not induce methemoglobinemia. However, this potential side effect must be considered by emergency physicians when treating suspected CN toxicity, especially if the patient does not improve after antidotal therapy.

Naloxone Dosing After Opioid Overdose in the Era of Illicitly Manufactured Fentanyl.

INTRODUCTION: Illicitly manufactured fentanyl (IMF) is responsible for a growing number of deaths. Some case series have suggested that IMF overdoses require significantly higher naloxone doses than heroin overdoses. Our objective was to determine if the naloxone dose required to treat an opioid overdose is associated with the finding of fentanyl, opiates, or both on urine drug screen (UDS). METHODS: A retrospective chart review was conducted at a single emergency department and its affiliated emergency medical services (EMS) agency. The charts of all patients who received naloxone through this EMS from 1/1/2017 to 6/15/2018 were reviewed. The study included patients diagnosed with a non-suicidal opioid overdose whose UDS was positive for opiates, fentanyl, or both. Data collected included demographics, vital signs, initial GCS, EMS and ED naloxone administrations, response to treatment, laboratory findings, and ED disposition. The fentanyl-only and fentanyl + opiate groups were compared to the opiate-only group using the stratified (by ED provider) variant of the Mann-Whitney U test. RESULTS: Eight hundred and thirty-seven charts were reviewed, and 121 subjects were included in the final analysis. The median age of included subjects was 38 years and 75% were male. In the naloxone dose analysis, neither the fentanyl-only (median 0.8 mg, IQR 0.4-1.6; p = 0.68) nor the fentanyl + opiate (median 0.8 mg, IQR 0.4-1.2; p = 0.56) groups differed from the opiate-only group (median 0.58 mg, IQR 0.4-1.6). CONCLUSION: Our findings refute the notion that high potency synthetic opioids like illicitly manufactured fentanyl require increased doses of naloxone to successfully treat an overdose. There were no significant differences in the dose of naloxone required to treat opioid overdose patients with UDS evidence of exposure to fentanyl, opiates, or both. Further evaluation of naloxone stocking and dosing protocols is needed.

Leadership Roles in Opioid Stewardship and the Treatment of Patients with Opioid Use Disorder Among Medical Toxicologists.

BACKGROUND: Despite significant efforts, deaths due to drug overdose remain at near record levels. In efforts combat this crisis, the Joint Commission now requires that accredited hospitals implement safe opioid prescribing practices. Emergency department visits and hospitalizations related to opioid use disorder (OUD) provide an opportunity to initiate evidence-based treatment. However, both situations require the presence of qualified physician leaders and clinicians, which many facilities lack. Medical toxicologists have the expertise needed to fill these voids, but the scope and prevalence of their involvement are unknown. We sought to determine the engagement of medical toxicologists in leading opioid stewardship initiatives and the treatment of patients with OUD. METHODS: Members of the American College of Medical Toxicology (ACMT) were surveyed about their leadership roles in opioid stewardship and clinical practices regarding OUD from March-June 2019. ACMT represents more than 80% of the nation's board-certified medical toxicologists. The electronic survey utilized branching logic and results are presented descriptively; thus, responses are presented as a percentage of the number of respondents to individual questions rather than the total number of participants. RESULTS: One hundred and thirty-one out of 382 eligible individuals from at least 76 institutions responded to the survey. A majority (60%) had a DATA 2000 X-waiver, 21% were board-certified in addiction medicine (AM), and an additional 22% were definitely or possibly planning to pursue board certification in AM. Sixteen percent of respondents reported having a formal leadership role to address opioid pain management and stewardship, and 17% had a formal leadership role that specifically addresses clinical treatment for OUD within their institution. Fifty-seven respondents prescribed buprenorphine in emergency medicine practice, 41 as inpatient consultants, and 23 in an outpatient clinic. CONCLUSIONS: Medical toxicologists can serve as leaders to promote safe opioid prescribing practices through both institutional and governmental opioid task forces and opioid stewardship programs. They also provide important addiction-related clinical care to patients with OUD.

Successful Treatment of Antihypertensive Overdose Using Intravenous Angiotensin II.

BACKGROUND: Despite multiple treatment options, antihypertensive overdose remains a cause of significant morbidity and mortality. Intravenous angiotensin II (AG II) is approved for use in vasodilatory shock. We describe 2 cases of refractory shock from antihypertensive overdose that were successfully treated using AG II. CASE REPORTS: A 24-year-old female presented after an overdose of multiple antihypertensive medications, including an angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor (ACEI). She developed hypotension that was refractory to norepinephrine, epinephrine, and vasopressin, with a mean arterial pressure (MAP) of 57 mm Hg 9 h after emergency department arrival. Fifteen minutes after starting AG II at 10 ng/kg/min, her heart rate and MAP rose by 7 beats/min and 12 mm Hg, respectively. Her hemodynamic parameters continued to improve thereafter. She developed acute kidney injury, which resolved prior to discharge. The second patient, a 65-year-old male, presented after an overdose of multiple antihypertensive medications, including an ACEI. Despite norepinephrine, epinephrine, and hyperinsulinemia-euglycemia, he remained bradycardic and hypotensive, with a heart rate of 47 beats/min and MAP of 59 mm Hg. Thirty minutes after starting AG II at 10 ng/kg/min, his heart rate was 61 beats/min and MAP was 66 mm Hg. He recovered without apparent sequelae. WHY SHOULD AN EMERGENCY PHYSICIAN BE AWARE OF THIS?: Antihypertensive overdose can lead to shock refractory to catecholamine and vasopressin therapy. Our experience suggests that AG II is efficacious in antihypertensive overdose and may be particularly efficacious in instances of ACEI overdose. However, further study is required to confirm the appropriate indication(s).

Does Lidocaine Cause False Positive Results on Cocaine Urine Drug Screen?

BACKGROUND: Individuals who have tested positive for cocaine have claimed that lidocaine, or its primary metabolite, norlidocaine (monoethylglycinexylidide (MEGX)), have caused false positive results for the cocaine metabolite benzoylecgonine (BE) on urinary immunoassay testing. OBJECTIVE: The goal of the study was to determine if lidocaine exposure from routine medical procedures can result in false positives on a commercially available cocaine immunoassay urine drug screen (UDS). METHODS: We performed a cross-sectional observational study of patients receiving lidocaine as part of their regular care. Standard immunoassay drug screens and confirmatory liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS) were performed on all urine samples to assess for MEGX and BE. RESULTS: In total, 168 subjects were enrolled; 121 samples positive for lidocaine were ultimately included for analysis. One hundred fourteen of the 121 were also positive for MEGX. None of the 121 were positive for cocaine/BE on the UDS (95% CI), 0-3.7% for the full sample and 0-3.9% for the 114 who tested positive for MEGX. CONCLUSION: The present study found no evidence that lidocaine or norlidocaine are capable of producing false positive results on standard cocaine urine immunoassays.

Seizures in tramadol overdoses reported in the ToxIC registry: predisposing factors and the role of naloxone.

Importance: Tramadol prescriptions have increased as fewer schedule II and III drugs are prescribed. There has been a concomitant increase in overdoses and adverse events recorded in the National Poison Data System. Seizure activity after tramadol overdose or therapeutic use is a well-documented adverse event. The primary objective is to evaluate the characteristics associated with seizures following single agent tramadol ingestion. Secondarily we aim to compare the rate of seizures in individuals treated, and not treated, with naloxone. Methods: We searched the Toxicology Investigators Consortium data registry for all cases of single agent tramadol ingestions from 01/01/2014 through 12/31/2017. Descriptive statistics were used to evaluate characteristics associated with increased risk of seizures. Binary logistic regressions were used to evaluate the associations between seizures and age, race, acuity, intent, toxidromes, symptoms, and treatments. Results: There were 80 single ingestion tramadol cases entered into the registry. Seizures developed in 42 (52.5%) patients. Asian patients (OR = 7.2, 95% CI: 1.9-27.3, p = .004) and patients abusing or misusing tramadol (OR = 3.2, 95% CI: 1.2-8.3, p = .02) more likely to develop seizures. Patients exhibiting an opioid toxidrome were significantly less likely to develop seizures (OR = 0.12, 95% CI: 0.03-0.60). Ingestion of tramadol as a means of self-harm and age were not associated with an increased risk of seizures. There was no significant association between naloxone administration and seizures (OR = 0.30, 95% CI 0.07-1.25). Conclusions: Based on data from the ToxIC registry, tramadol induced seizures are more likely in Asian patients and those abusing or misusing the medication. There was no association found between the development of seizures and the use of naloxone.

Designer benzodiazepines: a report of exposures recorded in the National Poison Data System, 2014-2017.

IMPORTANCE: Exposures to novel psychoactive substances are reported with increasing frequency in both the medical literature and the lay press. While the majority of reports describe synthetic cannabinoids and cathinones, a lesser understood family is the "designer benzodiazepines". The current literature describing human exposures to these compounds is comprised of case reports and small case series. OBJECTIVE: The primary objectives of this study are to describe epidemiologic trends and clinical effects of designer benzodiazepine use. METHODS: Data regarding single agent exposures to designer benzodiazepines between 1 January 2014 and 31 December 2017 was obtained from the National Poison Data System. Substances queried include: adinazolam, clonazolam, cloniprazepam, diclazepam, etizolam, flubromazepam, flubromazolam, meclonazepam, nifoxipam, norflurazepam, and pyrazolam. Data was summarized descriptively. RESULTS: 234 single agent exposures in 40 states were reported during the study period. The annual number of exposures increased each year, from 26 in 2014 to 112 in 2017, amounting to a 330% increase. The most common exposures were etizolam (n = 162) and clonazolam (n = 50). The most common clinical effects were drowsiness/lethargy (65%), and slurred speech (17%). 3% required intubation, 36% of cases required hospital admission, 22% to the intensive care unit. There was 1 death in the study population. CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of exposures to designer benzodiazepines is rising. Clinical effects are generally consistent with a sedative-hypnotic toxidrome. Severe effects, including death, seemed relatively uncommon in the study population.