Implementation of Bedaquiline, Pretomanid, and Linezolid in the United States: Experience Using a Novel All-Oral Treatment Regimen for Treatment of Rifampin-Resistant or Rifampin-Intolerant Tuberculosis Disease.

BACKGROUND: Rifampin-resistant tuberculosis is a leading cause of morbidity worldwide; only one-third of persons start treatment, and outcomes are often inadequate. Several trials demonstrate 90% efficacy using an all-oral, 6-month regimen of bedaquiline, pretomanid, and linezolid (BPaL), but significant toxicity occurred using 1200-mg linezolid. After US Food and Drug Administration approval in 2019, some US clinicians rapidly implemented BPaL using an initial 600-mg linezolid dose adjusted by serum drug concentrations and clinical monitoring. METHODS: Data from US patients treated with BPaL between 14 October 2019 and 30 April 2022 were compiled and analyzed by the BPaL Implementation Group (BIG), including baseline examination and laboratory, electrocardiographic, and clinical monitoring throughout treatment and follow-up. Linezolid dosing and clinical management was provider driven, and most patients had linezolid adjusted by therapeutic drug monitoring. RESULTS: Of 70 patients starting BPaL, 2 changed to rifampin-based therapy, 68 (97.1%) completed BPaL, and 2 of the 68 (2.9%) experienced relapse after completion. Using an initial 600-mg linezolid dose daily adjusted by therapeutic drug monitoring and careful clinical and laboratory monitoring for adverse effects, supportive care, and expert consultation throughout BPaL treatment, 3 patients (4.4%) with hematologic toxicity and 4 (5.9%) with neurotoxicity required a change in linezolid dose or frequency. The median BPaL duration was 6 months. CONCLUSIONS: BPaL has transformed treatment for rifampin-resistant or intolerant tuberculosis. In this cohort, effective treatment required less than half the duration recommended in 2019 US guidelines for drug-resistant tuberculosis. Use of individualized linezolid dosing and monitoring likely enhanced safety and treatment completion. The BIG cohort demonstrates that early implementation of new tuberculosis treatments in the United States is feasible.

Tendon Healing in a Mouse Model of Loeys-Dietz Syndrome: Controlled Study Using a Patellar Tendon Transection Model.

BACKGROUND: Loeys-Dietz syndrome (LDS) is a rare autosomal-dominant connective tissue disorder caused by genetic mutations in the transforming growth factor-ß (TGFß) signaling pathway. In addition to vascular malformations, patients with LDS commonly present with bone and tendon abnormalities, including joint laxity. While TGFß signaling dysregulation has been implicated in many of these clinical manifestations, the degree to which it influences the tendinopathy and tendon healing issues in LDS has not been determined. METHODS: Wound healing after patellar tendon transection was compared between wild-type (WT) and Tgfbr2-mutant (LDS) mice (7 mice per group). In all mice, the right patellar tendon was transected at midsubstance, while the left was untouched to serve as a control. Mice were euthanized 6 weeks after surgery. Tendon specimens were harvested for histopathologic grading according to a previously validated scoring metric, and gene expression levels of Mmp2, Tgfb2, and other TGFß-signaling genes were assayed. Between-group comparisons were made using 1-way analysis of variance with post hoc Tukey honestly significant difference testing. RESULTS: Expression levels of assayed genes were similar between LDS and WT tendons at baseline; however, at 6 weeks after patellar tendon transection, LDS tendons showed sustained elevations in Mmp2 and Tgfb2 compared with baseline values; these elevations were not seen in normal tendons undergoing the same treatments. Histologically, untreated LDS tendons had significantly greater cellularity and cell rounding compared with untreated WT tendons, and both WT and LDS tendons had significantly worse histologic scores after surgery. CONCLUSION: We present the first mechanistic insight into the effect of LDS on tendons and tendon healing. The morphologic differences between LDS and WT tendons at baseline may help explain the increased risk of tendon/ligament dysfunction in patients with LDS, and the differential healing response to injury in LDS may account for the delayed healing and weaker repair tissue. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level V.