Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 8 de 8
Filter
1.
Int J Surg ; 20: 135-9, 2015 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26118604

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Patients with postoperative ileus (POI), a common post-surgical event, experience intense discomfort. Various treatments targeting prevention of POI have shown to have an unpredictable effect. We introduced a novel postoperative bowel management protocol in patients implanted with a continuous-flow left ventricular assist device (CF-LVAD). The effect of this protocol on POI was evaluated. METHODS: Patients receiving an old bowel management protocol (OBMP; 01/2007-03/2009) were compared with those receiving a new bowel management protocol (NBMP; 04/2009-12/2013). The OBMP consisted of advancing the diet as tolerated, bisacodyl suppositories and enemas with the goal of a bowel movement (BM) every 3 days. The NBMP consisted of clear liquids until first BM is achieved, then full liquids until the second BM, then advancing to goal diet. Docusate is given on postoperative day (POD) 1 and bisacodyl PR on POD2 with enemas if ileus develops. Enemas are added POD3 if no BM has occurred. Polyethylene glycol is considered daily for patients prone to constipation. The goal is a BM every 2 days. Patients were made nil per os (NPO) with any signs of ileus. RESULTS: One hundred eighteen patients were implanted with CF-LVADs during the study period. The incidence of ileus significantly decreased from 19% in the OBMP group to 4% percent in the NBMP group (p < 0.05). In-hospital mortality was not different between the two groups (6% vs. 2% p = 0.35). CONCLUSIONS: A novel postoperative bowel management protocol successfully decreased the incidence of POI following CF-LVAD implant surgery at our institution.


Subject(s)
Cardiac Surgical Procedures , Heart-Assist Devices , Ileus/prevention & control , Postoperative Care/methods , Postoperative Complications/prevention & control , Prosthesis Implantation , Adult , Aged , Female , Humans , Ileus/epidemiology , Ileus/etiology , Incidence , Male , Middle Aged , Postoperative Complications/epidemiology , Postoperative Complications/etiology , Retrospective Studies , Treatment Outcome
3.
J Pharm Pract ; 25(2): 232-49, 2012 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22392840

ABSTRACT

Advances in mechanical circulatory support, such as the use of ventricular assist devices (VADs), have become a means for prolonging survival in end-stage heart failure (HF). VADs decrease the symptoms of HF and improve quality of life by replacing some of the work of a failing heart. They unload the ventricle to provide improved cardiac output and end-organ perfusion, resulting in improvement in cardiorenal syndromes and New York Heart Association functional class rating. VADs are currently used asa bridge to heart transplantation, a bridge to recovery of cardiac function, or as destination therapy. Complications of VAD include bleeding, infections, arrhythmias, multiple organ failure, right ventricular failure, and neurological dysfunction. Patients with VAD have unique pharmacotherapeutic requirements in terms of anticoagulation, appropriate antibiotic selection, and continuation of HF medications. Pharmacists in acute care and community settings are well prepared to care for the patient with VAD. These patients require thorough counseling and follow-up with regard to prevention and treatment of infections, appropriate levels of anticoagulation, and maintenance of fluid balance. A basic understanding of this unique therapy can assist pharmacists in attending to the needs of patients with VAD.


Subject(s)
Community Pharmacy Services/standards , Heart Failure/therapy , Heart-Assist Devices/adverse effects , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Quality of Life , Ventricular Function/physiology , Humans , Pharmacists , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
4.
J Heart Lung Transplant ; 28(6): 591-7, 2009 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19481020

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Ventricular assist device (VAD) implantation as a bridge to transplant (BTT) has become an important approach for heart transplant candidates. In this study we document our institutional long-term results and recent improvements in BTT therapy. METHODS: We retrospectively studied 531 consecutive heart transplant recipients between January 1990 and August 2007. The cohort was divided into old orthotopic heart transplant (OHT) without device (oOHT; n = 399, January 1990 to July 2003), old BTT (oBTT; n = 41, January 1990 to July 2003), new OHT without device (nOHT; n = 58, August 2003 to August 2007) and new BTT (nBTT; n = 33, August 2003 to August 2007) groups. Demographics and post-transplant outcomes were assessed. RESULTS: Post-transplant survival in the nBTT group improved significantly compared with the oBTT group (log-rank test, p = 0.01) and survival in the nOHT group tended to be higher than in the oOHT group (p = 0.19). Survival in the oBTT group was significantly worse than in the oOHT group (p < 0.01). However, there was no difference between the nBTT and nOHT groups. The mean period of BTT support was 113 (range 5 to 524) days in the oBTT group and 148 (range 38 to 503) days in the nBTT group. Multivariate analysis revealed diabetes (p < 0.01) and biventricular support (p = 0.04) as significant independent predictors of post-transplant mortality. CONCLUSIONS: Post-transplant survival has improved in recent BTT patients. Indeed, recent outcome for OHT after BTT has become equivalent to that for OHT without VAD. These data suggest that advances in device technology and our institutional multidisciplinary program have improved survival and allow BTT candidates to have an outcome equivalent to that of non-VAD patients in the recent era.


Subject(s)
Heart Failure/surgery , Heart Transplantation/mortality , Heart Transplantation/trends , Heart-Assist Devices/trends , Adolescent , Adult , Cohort Studies , Female , Graft Rejection/complications , Humans , Length of Stay , Male , Middle Aged , Multivariate Analysis , Outcome Assessment, Health Care , Patient Selection , Retrospective Studies , Survival Rate , Young Adult
5.
Congest Heart Fail ; 15(2): 58-62, 2009.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19385118

ABSTRACT

Predictors of myocardial recovery after ventricular assist device (VAD) implantation are not well defined. The authors report their current VAD weaning protocol. Between 2003 and 2006, 38 patients received VAD implants. The authors performed 5 tests in 4 patients in whom echocardiography findings suggested myocardial recovery after implant. The protocol consists of assessing symptoms, electrocardiographic findings, hemodynamics, and cardiac function at baseline and as VAD support is weaned. As a result, 3 patients passed the weaning protocol and were explanted. There has been no recurrence of heart failure 667, 752, and 1007 days after explant, respectively. One patient failed the protocol after 151 days of support because of low cardiac index during the protocol. This patient was transplanted. This current experience of VAD weaning protocol is a novel tool to identify candidates for successful VAD explantation.


Subject(s)
Device Removal , Heart Failure/rehabilitation , Heart-Assist Devices , Recovery of Function/physiology , Ventricular Dysfunction, Left/rehabilitation , Adult , Cardiotonic Agents/administration & dosage , Dobutamine/administration & dosage , Echocardiography , Female , Heart Failure/diagnostic imaging , Heart Failure/physiopathology , Hemodynamics/drug effects , Hemodynamics/physiology , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Milrinone/administration & dosage , Myocardial Contraction/physiology , Recovery of Function/drug effects , Ventricular Dysfunction, Left/diagnostic imaging , Ventricular Dysfunction, Left/physiopathology , Ventricular Function, Left/physiology
6.
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg ; 8(1): 84-8, 2009 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18940829

ABSTRACT

High implantation costs and long postoperative length of stay (LOS) in debilitated patients complicate ventricular assist device (VAD) therapy. Between July 2000 and February 2005, 30 patients received a VAD at our institution. Of those, 20 patients were successfully discharged from the hospital with VADs. In August 2003, a multidisciplinary team was formed consisting of all services for VAD patients to replace a single-discipline (cardiac surgery) system. This team evaluated potential VAD candidates and identified optimal timing for implantation. These 20 VAD patients were divided into two groups according to the initiation of multidisciplinary team; the traditional group (n=7, July 2000-July 2003) and the multidisciplinary group (n=13, August 2003-February 2005). Patient demographics were not different. The LOS decreased from 61 to 15 days (P<0.01), especially LOS on the floor decreased from 35 to 7 days (P=0.03). The floor cost was significantly reduced ($47,111 vs. $8742, P<0.01), leading to a decrease in total postoperative cost ($202,238 vs. $161,744, P<0.01). The 30-day readmission rate decreased (5/7 patients vs. 1/13 patients, P<0.01). A multidisciplinary approach significantly decreased LOS and cost after VAD therapy, mostly by decreasing the cost of routine non-ICU care, without increasing the readmission rate.


Subject(s)
Cost Savings , Heart Failure/economics , Heart Failure/therapy , Heart-Assist Devices/economics , Hospital Costs , Length of Stay/economics , Patient Care Team/economics , Postoperative Care/economics , Adult , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Patient Discharge/economics , Patient Readmission/economics , Program Evaluation , Retrospective Studies , Treatment Outcome
7.
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg ; 34(2): 281-8, 2008 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18513988

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Ventricular assist devices (VADs) have been implanted since 1990 in our institution, becoming an increasingly common treatment for end-stage heart failure. Beginning in 1997, VAD patients were discharged home when feasible. In August 2003, a dedicated multidisciplinary VAD team (cardiac surgeons, cardiologists, VAD coordinators, nurses, rehabilitation specialists, nutrition experts, psychologists, pharmacists, social workers, and administrators) was created to optimize the management of VAD patients. The purpose of this study is to analyze the impact of these changes in care at our center over the last 17 years. METHODS: We retrospectively studied 107 consecutive VAD recipients between June 1990 and August 2006. VADs were implanted as bridge to recovery, bridge to transplant and destination therapy. The cohort was divided by care plans into early (n=37, June 1990-1996), mid (n=32, 1997-July 2003), and late groups (n=38, August 2003-August 2006). Demographic profile, survival and complications were assessed. RESULTS: Patient demographics tended to show an increased severity of illness over time. Post-VAD survival rate significantly improved in the late group (post-VAD 1- and 3-year survival rates; early: 54.1% and 40.5%; mid: 51.6% and 41.9%; late: 86.8% and 82.5%, p<0.001, respectively). The incidence of complications including re-operation, major bleeding and major infection, significantly decreased in the late group (p<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Outcomes have improved dramatically in recent VAD patients, despite an increasingly high-risk patient population. These data suggest that advances in device technology and medical therapies, as well as a multidisciplinary approach, have improved survival on VAD therapy.


Subject(s)
Heart Failure/therapy , Heart-Assist Devices , Adult , Aged , Antibiotic Prophylaxis , Epidemiologic Methods , Female , Heart Failure/mortality , Hemodynamics , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Patient Care Team/organization & administration , Patient Selection , Postoperative Complications , Prognosis , Reoperation , Treatment Outcome
8.
J Heart Lung Transplant ; 27(3): 353-6, 2008 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18342761

ABSTRACT

Refractory ventricular tachycardia (VT) can be a potentially life-threatening rhythm in the presence of non-ischemic dilated cardiomyopathy, particularly when it results in hemodynamic compromise. A 65-year-old man with non-ischemic cardiomyopathy was referred for multiple episodes of VT. A HeartMate left ventricular assist device (LVAD) was implanted to stabilize and control the VT. However, he had multiple episodes of VT and the frequency of ventricular arrhythmias did not improve after LVAD implantation. He required electrical cardioversion to treat each episode. On Day 41 post-operatively, radiofrequency ablation was performed. Two significant areas of scarring were identified and were successfully ablated. After ablation, he did not have significant sustained VT episodes and was discharged.


Subject(s)
Catheter Ablation/methods , Heart-Assist Devices , Tachycardia, Ventricular/surgery , Aged , Electrocardiography , Heart Rate/physiology , Heart Ventricles/physiopathology , Heart Ventricles/surgery , Humans , Male , Tachycardia, Ventricular/physiopathology , Treatment Outcome
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...