Automatic dose verification system for breast radiotherapy: Method validation, contour propagation and DVH parameters evaluation.

PURPOSE: Image guided radiotherapy (IGRT) strategies allow detecting and monitoring anatomical changes during external beam radiotherapy (EBRT). However, assessing the dosimetric impact of anatomical changes is not straightforward. In current IGRT strategies dose volume histograms (DVH) are not available due to lack of contours and dose recalculations on the cone-beam CT (CBCT) scan. This study investigates the feasibility of using automatically calculated DVH parameters in CBCTs using an independent dose calculation engine and propagated contours. METHOD: A prospective study (NCT03385031) of thirty-one breast cancer patients who received additional CBCT imaging (N = 70) was performed. Manual and automatically propagated contours were generated for all CBCTs and an automatic dose recalculation was performed. Differences between planned and CBCT-derived DVH parameters (mean and maximum dose to targets, 95% volume coverage to targets and mean heart dose (MHD)) were calculated using the dose verification system with manual and propagated contours and, in both cases, benchmarked against DVH differences quantified in the TPS using manually contoured CBCTs. RESULTS: Differences in DVH parameters between the TPS and dose verification system with propagated contours were -1.3% to 0.7% (95% CI) for mean dose to the target volume, -0.3 to 0.2 Gy (95% CI) in MHD and -3.9% to 2.9% (95% CI) in target volume coverage. CONCLUSION: The use of an independent fully automatic dose verification system with contour propagation showed to be feasible and sufficiently reliable to recalculate CBCT based DVHs during breast EBRT. Volume coverage parameters, i.e. V95%, proved to be especially sensitive to contouring differences.

Total Body Irradiation and Total Skin Irradiation Techniques in Belgium and the Netherlands: Current Clinical Practice.

PURPOSE: In 2014, a Belgian/Dutch Nederlandse Commissie voor Stralingsdosimetrie (NCS) task group was formed to develop guidelines on the clinical practice of total body irradiation (TBI) and total skin irradiation (TSI). METHODS AND MATERIALS: As a basis for these guidelines, a survey conducted among 17 Belgian and Dutch radiation oncology institutions measured the clinical practice of TBI. Four of these institutions also performed TSI. An update was performed in 2019 and 2020 because several institutions innovated their TBI techniques. RESULTS: As old and more recent studies have shown, clinical protocols for TBI and TSI still vary considerably between institutions. CONCLUSIONS: New radiation therapy technologies have been introduced relatively slowly for TBI purposes.

Three-dimensional dose evaluation in breast cancer patients to define decision criteria for adaptive radiotherapy.

BACKGROUND: Dose-guided adaptive radiation therapy (DGART) is the systematic evaluation and adaptation of the dose delivery during treatment for an individual patient. The aim of this study is to define quantitative action levels for DGART by evaluating changes in 3D dose metrics in breast cancer and correlate them with clinical expert evaluation. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Twenty-three breast cancer treatment plans were evaluated, that were clinically adapted based on institutional IGRT guidelines. Reasons for adaptation were variation in seroma, hematoma, edema, positioning or problems using voluntary deep inspiration breath hold. Sixteen patients received a uniform dose to the breast (clinical target volume 1; CTV1). Six patients were treated with a simultaneous integrated boost to CTV2. The original plan was copied to the CT during treatment (re-CT) or to the stitched cone-beam CT (CBCT). Clinical expert evaluation of the re-calculated dose distribution and extraction of dose-volume histogram (DVH) parameters were performed. The extreme scenarios were evaluated, assuming all treatment fractions were given to the original planning CT (pCT), re-CT or CBCT. Reported results are mean ± SD. RESULTS: DVH results showed a mean dose (Dmean) difference between pCT and re-CT of -0.4 ± 1.4% (CTV1) and -1.4 ± 2.1% (CTV2). The difference in V95% was -2.6 ± 4.4% (CTV1) and -9.8 ± 8.3% (CTV2). Clinical evaluation and DVH evaluation resulted in a recommended adaptation in 17/23 or 16/23 plans, respectively. Applying thresholds on the DVH parameters: Dmean CTV, V95% CTV, Dmax, mean lung dose, volume exceeding 107% (uniform dose) or 90% (SIB) of the prescribed dose enabled the identification of patients with an assumed clinically relevant dose difference, with a sensitivity of 0.89 and specificity of 1.0. Re-calculation on CBCT imaging identified the same plans for adaptation as re-CT imaging. CONCLUSIONS: Clinical expert evaluation can be related to quantitative DVH parameters on re-CT or CBCT imaging to select patients for DGART.

Set-up verification and 2-dimensional electronic portal imaging device dosimetry during breath hold compared with free breathing in breast cancer radiation therapy.

PURPOSE: To compare set-up and 2-dimensional (2D) electronic portal imaging device (EPID) dosimetry data of breast cancer patients treated during voluntary moderately deep inspiration breath hold (vmDIBH) and free breathing (FB). METHODS AND MATERIALS: Set-up data were analyzed for 29 and 51 consecutively treated patients, irradiated during FB and vmDIBH, respectively. Of the 51 vmDIBH patients, the first 25 had undergone an extra trained computed tomography (CT) scan and used an additional "breathing stick" (vmDIBH_trained). The last 26 patients did not use the breathing stick and did not undergo a trained CT (vmDIBH_untrained). The delivered 2D transit dose was measured with EPID in 15 FB and 28 vmDIBH patients and compared with a 2D predicted dose by calculating global gamma values γ using 5% and 5 mm as dose difference and distance-to-agreement criteria, respectively. Measurements with a percentage of pixels with an absolute gamma value > 1 (|γ| > 1) greater than 10% were classified as deviating. RESULTS: Only small, sub-millimeter differences were seen in the set-up data between the different patient groups. The mean of means, systematic error, and random error ranged from - 0.6 mm to 3.3 mm. The percentage of pixels with |γ| > 1 for all patients was 9.8% (2-25.8). No statistically significant differences were observed between the patient groups. In total, 38% of the gamma images were classified as deviating: 43.6% in vmDIBH_untrained patients compared with 38.0% in vmDIBH_trained patients and 33.3% in FB patients (P > .05). CONCLUSION: Both set-up and 2D EPID dosimetry data indicate that reproducibility of radiation therapy for patients treated during FB and vmDIBH is similar. Small but not significant differences in 2D EPID dosimetry were observed. Further investigation with 3-dimensional EPID dosimetry is recommended to investigate the clinical relevance of deviant gamma images.

In vivo dosimetry with a linear MOSFET array to evaluate the urethra dose during permanent implant brachytherapy using iodine-125.

PURPOSE: To develop a technique to monitor the dose rate in the urethra during permanent implant brachytherapy using a linear MOSFET array, with sufficient accuracy and without significantly extending the implantation time. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Phantom measurements were performed to determine the optimal conditions for clinical measurements. In vivo measurements were performed in 5 patients during the (125)I brachytherapy implant procedure. To evaluate if the urethra dose obtained in the operating room with the ultrasound transducer in the rectum and the patient in treatment position is a reference for the total accumulated dose; additional measurements were performed after the implantation procedure, in the recovery room. RESULTS: In vivo measurements during and after the implantation procedure agree very well, illustrating that the ultrasound transducer in the rectum and patient positioning do not influence the measured dose in the urethra. In vivo dose values obtained during the implantation are therefore representative for the total accumulated dose in the urethra. In 5 patients, the dose rates during and after the implantation were below the maximum dose rate of the urethra, using the planned seed distribution. CONCLUSION: In vivo dosimetry during the implantation, using a MOSFET array, is a feasible technique to evaluate the dose in the urethra during the implantation of (125)I seeds for prostate brachytherapy.

In vivo dosimetry using a linear Mosfet-array dosimeter to determine the urethra dose in 125I permanent prostate implants.

PURPOSE: In vivo dosimetry during brachytherapy of the prostate with (125)I seeds is challenging because of the high dose gradients and low photon energies involved. We present the results of a study using metal-oxide-semiconductor field-effect transistor (MOSFET) dosimeters to evaluate the dose in the urethra after a permanent prostate implantation procedure. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Phantom measurements were made to validate the measurement technique, determine the measurement accuracy, and define action levels for clinical measurements. Patient measurements were performed with a MOSFET array in the urinary catheter immediately after the implantation procedure. A CT scan was performed, and dose values, calculated by the treatment planning system, were compared to in vivo dose values measured with MOSFET dosimeters. RESULTS: Corrections for temperature dependence of the MOSFET array response and photon attenuation in the catheter on the in vivo dose values are necessary. The overall uncertainty in the measurement procedure, determined in a simulation experiment, is 8.0% (1 SD). In vivo dose values were obtained for 17 patients. In the high-dose region (> 100 Gy), calculated and measured dose values agreed within 1.7% +/- 10.7% (1 SD). In the low-dose region outside the prostate (< 100 Gy), larger deviations occurred. CONCLUSIONS: MOSFET detectors are suitable for in vivo dosimetry during (125)I brachytherapy of prostate cancer. An action level of +/- 16% (2 SD) for detection of errors in the implantation procedure is achievable after validation of the detector system and measurement conditions.

Evaluation of three different CT simulation and planning procedures for the preoperative irradiation of operable rectal cancer.

PURPOSE: To find the best procedure regarding quality and work load for treatment planning in operable non-locally advanced rectal cancer using 3D CT-based information. METHODS: The study population consisted of 62 patients with non-locally advanced tumours, as defined by MRI in the lower (N=16), middle (N=25) and upper (N=21) rectum referred for preoperative short-course radiotherapy. In procedure 1 (Pr1), planning in one central plane was performed (field borders/shielding based on bony anatomy). In procedure 2 (Pr2), field borders were determined by 2 markers for the extension of the CTV in the cranial and ventral direction. Dose optimization was performed in one central and two border planes. In procedure 3(Pr3) the PTV volume (CTV was contoured on CT) received conformal treatment (3D dose optimization). RESULTS: Conformity index reached 1.6 for Pr3 vs. 2.2 for Pr2 (p<0.001). PTV coverage was 87%, 94%, 99% in Pr1, Pr2, Pr3, respectively (p=0.001). In Pr2 target coverage was below 95% for low/middle tumours. PTV coverage was reduced by narrow field borders (18-23%) and shielding (28%). A total of 43.5% (1-100) of the bladder volume was treated in Pr2 in contrast to 16% (0-68) in Pr3 (p<0.001). The maximum dose was exceeded in 10 patients (26-298 cc) and 2 patients (21-36 cc) in procedures 1 and 2, respectively. The overall time spent by technologists was 86 min for Pr3 vs 17 min in Pr2 and Pr1 (p<0.001), for radiation oncologists this difference was 24 vs 4 min (p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Pr1 does not fulfill todays quality requirements. Pr3 provides the best quality at the cost of working time. Pr2 is less time consuming, however, the PTV coverage was insufficient, with also much larger treatment volumes. An optimization of the PTV coverage in Pr2 even further enlarged the treatment volume.

Prone breast irradiation for pendulous breasts.

The purpose of this study was to quantify the differences in doses in the organs at risk and to compare the PTV coverage and dose homogeneity of patients with pendulous breasts between prone and supine position. In 10 patients a CT-based treatment plan was made in prone and supine position. Data about dose homogeneity and doses to organs at risk were collected. Dose homogeneity turned out to be better in prone position and doses in organs at risk were lower, but with the current technique, this occurred at the cost of a reduced PTV coverage.