Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Am J Public Health ; 107(S2): S126-S133, 2017 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28892444

ABSTRACT

The health impacts of recent global infectious disease outbreaks and other disasters have demonstrated the importance of strengthening public health systems to better protect communities from naturally occurring and human-caused threats. Public health emergency management (PHEM) is an emergent field of practice that draws on specific sets of knowledge, techniques, and organizing principles necessary for the effective management of complex health events. We highlight how the nascent field of PHEM has evolved in recent years. We explore this development by first examining multiple sites of intersection between the fields of public health and emergency management. We then analyze 2 of the principal pillars on which PHEM was built: organizational and programmatic (i.e., industry) standards and the incident management system. This is followed by a sketch of the key domains, or functional areas, of PHEM and their application to the emergency management cycle. We conclude with some observations about PHEM in a global context and discuss how the field might continue to evolve.


Subject(s)
Disaster Planning/organization & administration , Disasters/prevention & control , Disease Outbreaks/prevention & control , Emergency Medical Services/organization & administration , Public Health Administration/methods , Humans , Organizational Objectives , United States
2.
MMWR Suppl ; 65(3): 28-34, 2016 Jul 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27389463

ABSTRACT

Establishing a functional incident management system (IMS) is important in the management of public health emergencies. In response to the 2014-2016 Ebola virus disease (Ebola) epidemic in West Africa, CDC established the Emergency Management Development Team (EMDT) to coordinate technical assistance for developing emergency management capacity in Guinea, Liberia, and Sierra Leone. EMDT staff, deployed staff, and partners supported each country to develop response goals and objectives, identify gaps in response capabilities, and determine strategies for coordinating response activities. To monitor key programmatic milestones and assess changes in emergency management and response capacities over time, EMDT implemented three data collection methods in country: coordination calls, weekly written situation reports, and an emergency management dashboard tool. On the basis of the information collected, EMDT observed improvements in emergency management capacity over time in all three countries. The collaborations in each country yielded IMS structures that streamlined response and laid the foundation for long-term emergency management programs.The activities summarized in this report would not have been possible without collaboration with many U.S and international partners (http://www.cdc.gov/vhf/ebola/outbreaks/2014-west-africa/partners.html).


Subject(s)
Capacity Building/organization & administration , Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, U.S./organization & administration , Epidemics/prevention & control , Hemorrhagic Fever, Ebola/prevention & control , Guinea/epidemiology , Hemorrhagic Fever, Ebola/epidemiology , Humans , International Cooperation , Liberia/epidemiology , Professional Role , Sierra Leone/epidemiology , United States
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...