Long-term Outcomes of Multiligament Knee Injuries in American Football Players.

BACKGROUND: Long-term outcomes for isolated anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstructions in competitive American football athletes are well reported in the literature, but little data currently exist regarding multiligament knee injury (MLKI) reconstruction outcomes. PURPOSE: To examine patient-reported and return-to-sport outcomes of competitive American football athletes who underwent primary, single-staged, multiligament knee reconstruction. STUDY DESIGN: Case series; Level of evidence, 4. METHODS: We identified patients from our institution's prospectively collected data repository between 2001 and 2020 who underwent single-staged surgical reconstruction of an MLKI sustained during competitive participation in American football. We assessed patient-reported outcomes at a minimum of 2 years after surgery using the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) Subjective Knee Form and questions regarding surgical satisfaction and return to sport. Successful return to sport was defined as a return to preinjury level of competition. We summarized all outcome data and compared outcomes between 2-ligament and >2-ligament groups and between ACL-only MLKI injury and bicruciate MLKI injury groups using independent t test for IKDC scores and chi-square test for return to sport. Additionally, we evaluated predictors of postoperative IKDC scores using linear regression and predictors of return to sport using logistic regression. RESULTS: Outcome data were successfully collected for 53 of 73 total eligible patients (73%; mean follow-up time, 7.7 ± 4.0 years; all male; mean age at surgery, 18.1 ± 2.7 years). The mean postoperative IKDC score was 84 ± 16. The most common level of preinjury competition was high school (n = 36; 68%), followed by college (n = 10; 19%). Seven patients did not return to sport competition at any level due to limitations from their knee surgery, and 82% of patients that attempted to return to preinjury level of sport were able to do so. A total of 50 patients (94%) were satisfied or very satisfied with their surgical outcome. The 2-ligament (n = 39) and >2-ligament (n = 14) groups did not significantly differ in IKDC scores (P = .96) or proportions with successful return to sport (P = .77). Similarly, the ACL-MLKI injury (n = 39) and bicruciate MLKI injury (n = 14) groups did not significantly differ in IKDC scores (P = .89) or proportions with successful return to sport (P = .77). Age and body mass index were not significantly associated with IKDC scores or successful return to sport at follow-up (all P > .05). CONCLUSION: This study may represent the largest cohort of competitive American football athletes evaluated for longitudinal outcomes after multiligament knee reconstruction. Despite the severity of these injuries, we found good knee-related function and that the large majority of athletes who attempted to return to sport were successful. The majority of athletes (94%) were satisfied with their operative treatment.

Outcomes and Proportions of Subsequent Contralateral Sports Hernia Repair Following Primary Unilateral Repair.

BACKGROUND: In the event that nonoperative treatment for sports hernia fails, surgical repair may be warranted. Bilateral repair can occur in up to 45% of surgically treated patients. PURPOSE: To investigate the clinical outcomes of athletes who underwent unilateral sports hernia repair and determine the proportion of patients who required contralateral sports hernia repair. STUDY DESIGN: Case series; Level of evidence, 4. METHODS: We identified patients at our institution who underwent primary unilateral sports hernia repair (rectus abdominis-adductor longus aponeurotic plate repair and adductor lengthening) with a single surgeon between 2015 and 2020. We assessed patient-reported outcomes using the Hip Outcome Score-Sport (HOS-Sport), the Numeric Pain Rating Scale, and an internally developed return-to-play questionnaire. We further collected data regarding subsequent sports hernia procedures on the ipsilateral or contralateral side. We calculated summary statistics for outcomes and examined the association between preinjury patient characteristics and the HOS-Sport score at follow-up or successful return to preinjury sport using linear and logistic regression, respectively. RESULTS: A total of 104 of 128 (81.3%) eligible patients (mean age at surgery, 23.0 ± 6.2 years; 94.2% male; 51.9% American football athletes) completed follow-up at a mean time of 4.4 ± 1.5 years. Overall, 79.8% of athletes (n = 83) were able to return to their preinjury sport/activity, but 90.2% (83/92) who attempted to return were able to do so. When examining reasons for not returning to preinjury sport, only 9 patients reported not returning to preinjury sport because of limitations or persistent symptoms from their original injury. Only 4 patients underwent subsequent sports hernia procedures (3 contralateral, 1 ipsilateral revision) after their index unilateral sports hernia repair. At follow-up, the mean HOS-Sport score was high (94.0 ± 10.8), and the mean Numeric Pain Rating Scale score was low (0.31 ± 1.26). There were no preinjury patient characteristics associated with either the HOS-Sport score at follow-up or the successful return to preinjury sport. CONCLUSION: Patients with unilateral sports hernia symptoms can undergo repair and return to sport at the preinjury level with little concern for injuries to the contralateral groin. In our cohort, patient-reported hip function and pain outcomes at follow-up were excellent.

Clinical outcomes of osteochondritis dissecans lesions of the capitellum treated with arthroscopy with a mean follow-up period of 8.3 years.

BACKGROUND AND HYPOTHESIS: Although numerous studies exist evaluating the short-term clinical outcomes of patients who have undergone elbow arthroscopy for osteochondritis dissecans (OCD) of the capitellum, the literature on minimum 2-year clinical outcomes in a large cohort of patients is limited. We hypothesized that the clinical outcomes of patients treated arthroscopically for OCD of the capitellum would be favorable, with improved postoperative subjective functional and pain scores and with an acceptable return-to-play rate. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of a prospectively collected surgical database was performed to identify all patients treated surgically for OCD of the capitellum at our institution from January 2001 to August 2018. The inclusion criteria for this study included a diagnosis of OCD of the capitellum treated arthroscopically with a minimum 2-year follow-up period. The exclusion criteria included any prior surgical treatment on the ipsilateral elbow, missing operative reports, and cases in which any portion of the surgical procedure was performed in an open manner. Follow-up was performed by telephone using multiple patient-reported outcome questionnaires: American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons-Elbow (ASES-e), Andrews-Carson, and Kerlan-Jobe Orthopaedic Clinic Shoulder and Elbow Score (KJOC) questionnaires and our institution-specific return-to-play questionnaire. RESULTS: After the inclusion and exclusion criteria were applied to our surgical database, 107 eligible patients were identified. Of these, 90 were successfully contacted, for a follow-up rate of 84%. The mean age was 15.2 years, and the mean follow-up time was 8.3 years. A subsequent revision procedure was performed in 11 patients, for a 12% failure rate in these patients. The ASES-e pain score was an average of 4.0 on a maximum pain scale of 100, the ASES-e function score was an average of 34.5 of a maximum of 36, and the surgical satisfaction score was an average of 9.1 of 10. The average Andrews-Carson score was 87.1 of 100, and the average KJOC score for overhead athletes was 83.5 of 100. Additionally, of the 87 patients evaluated who played sports at the time of their arthroscopy, 81 (93%) returned to play. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrated an excellent return-to-play rate and satisfactory subjective questionnaire scores with a 12% failure rate following arthroscopy for OCD of the capitellum with a minimum 2-year follow-up period.

Clinical outcomes and return to play in softball players following SLAP repair or biceps tenodesis.

BACKGROUND: Shoulder pain due to labral tears and biceps tendonitis is commonly found in softball players. Surgical options include labral repair and biceps tenodesis. Although past studies are limited by heterogeneous study groups from multiple sports, this is the first study that assesses clinical outcomes and return to play rates for fast-pitch softball players. PURPOSE/HYPOTHESIS: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical outcomes and return to play for fast-pitch softball players treated for a superior labrum anterior posterior (SLAP) tear and recalcitrant biceps tendonitis with a biceps tenodesis compared with a traditional SLAP repair. We hypothesized that the biceps tenodesis would have comparable outcomes with a faster return to play compared with SLAP repair. METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis on fast-pitch softball players treated surgically for SLAP tear, recalcitrant biceps tendonitis, or a combination between 2001 and 2019 at our institution. Inclusion criteria were fast-pitch softball players who underwent biceps tenodesis or a SLAP repair with greater than 2-year follow-up. Exclusion criteria involved slow-pitch softball players, patients with less than 2-year follow-up, and patients who had undergone concomitant procedures on the ipsilateral shoulder at the time of SLAP repair or biceps tenodesis. Follow-up was either self-reported through OBERD, a patient-reported outcomes (PRO)-managing software, or achieved over the phone. Follow-up data included American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Standardized Shoulder Assessment Form score, Andrews Carson Score, Kerlan-Jobe Orthopaedic Clinic Shoulder and Elbow Score, Numeric Rating Scale for Pain, and our institution-specific return-to-play questionnaire. We statistically compared players who underwent biceps tenodesis or a SLAP repair, and compared pitchers with position players using Student t tests and Fisher exact test with statistical significance determined to be P < .05. RESULTS: From 60 eligible patients identified, follow-up outcome data were successfully captured for 47 (78%). Of the 18 SLAP repair patients, 17 (94%) returned to full competition at an average of 7.9 months. Of the 29 patients who underwent biceps tenodesis, 27 (93%) returned to full competition at an average of 7.1 months. Statistical analysis of PRO scores for each group found no significant differences between any of the measures used to evaluate patient outcomes, including no statistical difference in pitchers compared with position players. CONCLUSION: In conclusion, this study demonstrated comparable outcomes between SLAP repairs and biceps tenodesis procedures among our study group of fast-pitch softball players. There was no significant difference between RTP times between the 2 groups.

Clinical Outcomes of Ulnar Collateral Ligament Surgery in Nonthrowing Athletes.

BACKGROUND: Ulnar collateral ligament (UCL) surgery continues to demonstrate excellent clinical outcomes and a high return-to-play (RTP) rate with a low complication rate. Recent studies have demonstrated similar clinical outcomes for baseball players who have undergone either UCL reconstruction or UCL repair. In comparison, few studies have assessed the clinical outcomes of UCL surgery for nonthrowing athletes. PURPOSE/HYPOTHESIS: The primary objective of this study is to provide clinical outcomes of UCL surgery performed in nonthrowing athletes at a single institution with a minimum 2-year follow-up. Our hypothesis was that these patients would have similar clinical outcomes, complication rates, and RTP rates when compared with throwing athletes. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Case series; Level of evidence, 4. METHODS: From our longitudinal elbow registry, 40 nonthrowing athletes were identified who underwent UCL surgery (repair or reconstruction) between 2011 and 2019. Participant characteristics were recorded: age, sex, laterality, arm dominance, sport, level of competition, and type of surgery (UCL repair or reconstruction). Outcomes included RTP rate and average time, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) scores, and complications. RESULTS: From the 40 patients eligible for inclusion in this study with a minimum 2-year follow-up, 37 (93%) were successfully contacted: 16 male (43%) and 21 female (57%). Mean ± standard deviation age at the time of surgery was 18.0 ± 3.7 years. From the 37 technical procedures, 28 (76%) were UCL repairs and 9 (24%) were UCL reconstructions. For these patients, 15 (41%) had partial tears, 20 (54%) had complete tears, 1 (3%) had a medial epicondyle avulsion, and 1 (3%) had an unspecified pathology. Sports included football (n = 11), gymnastics (11), cheerleading (7), wrestling (4), volleyball (2), basketball (1), and acrobatics (1). Quarterbacks were excluded from the football patients, as quarterbacks are throwing athletes. Level of competition included high school (n = 26), college (8), professional (2), and youth sports (1). The RTP rate was 93% (26/28) at a mean 7.4 months for UCL repair and 100% (9/9) at a mean 10.0 months for UCL reconstruction. Mean ASES scores were 94.4 and 98.7 for UCL repair and reconstruction, respectively. Complications were low, with 2 patients in the UCL repair group requiring ulnar nerve transposition for ulnar nerve paresthesia. CONCLUSION: In nonthrowing athletes, patients undergoing UCL repair and UCL reconstruction show favorable outcomes at minimum 2-year follow-up. RTP and clinical outcomes are consistent with previous studies in baseball players as well as a parallel ongoing study conducted on non-baseball throwing athletes.