Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Contraception ; 70(5): 359-63, 2004 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15504373

ABSTRACT

The United States Food and Drug Administration approved a dedicated extended regimen of oral contraceptive (OC) pill in the fall of 2003. Few studies have explored how women or providers feel about menstrual suppression. This study describes women's and providers' attitudes toward menstrual suppression. A national sample of 1470 women and 512 providers responded to surveys asking about attitudes toward menstrual suppression. Seventy-eight percent of the women sample had never heard of menstrual suppression with OCs. Fifty-nine percent of women would be interested in not menstruating every month and one third would choose never to have a period. Only 7% of the providers thought it was physically necessary to have a period every month and 44% thought that menstrual suppression is a good idea. While 57% of providers said that their patients do not ask about extended use of OCs, 52% do prescribe them; patient request was the most common reason. Both samples thought that more research should be conducted and that the factors that would influence their decisions included long-term health effects, side effects, future fertility and cost. Results demonstrate that providers need to discuss this option with their patients.


Subject(s)
Attitude of Health Personnel , Attitude , Contraceptives, Oral, Combined/administration & dosage , Menstruation/psychology , Ovulation Inhibition/psychology , Adolescent , Adult , Drug Administration Schedule , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Surveys and Questionnaires , United States
2.
Contraception ; 69(4): 267-70, 2004 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15033399

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To compare, by conducting a randomized trial, Filshie clip and Pomeroy techniques for postpartum and intrapartum cesarean sterilizations in a United States teaching hospital with respect to surgeon preference and perioperative outcomes. METHOD: Thirty-two obstetric patients consented for sterilization were randomized to Pomeroy technique or Filshie clip placement. Following the surgical procedure, surgeons and operating room technicians completed a survey regarding their experience with the procedures and preference. Patient demographic data, time for procedure and follow-up visits were obtained by chart review. RESULTS: For most postpartum sterilizations, the mean duration of the procedure was almost 7 min faster for the Filshie clip technique (p = 0.08); perioperative outcomes were equivalent (p = 0.05). Application of the Filshie clip was rated easier than Pomeroy suture application and, overall, the Filshie clip sterilization procedure was rated less difficult (p = 0.03). Seventy percent of surgeons preferred the Filshie clip technique and would choose it if only one postpartum sterilization method was available. CONCLUSION: For obstetric sterilization, surgeons preferred the Filshie clip over the Pomeroy technique. In addition, operating time was shorter for the Filshie clip. This pilot study suggests that use of the Filshie clip technique has the potential to establish a new standard of care for postpartum and intrapartum cesarean sterilization.


Subject(s)
Cesarean Section/methods , Sterilization, Tubal/instrumentation , Sterilization, Tubal/methods , Adult , Female , Humans , Intraoperative Period , Pilot Projects , Postpartum Period , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...