Leveraging a Clinical Phase Ib Proof-of-Concept Study for the GPR40 Agonist MK-8666 in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes for Model-Informed Phase II Dose Selection.

GPR40 mediates free fatty acid-induced insulin secretion in beta cells. We investigated the safety, pharmacokinetics, and glucose response of MK-8666, a partial GPR40 agonist, after once-daily multiple dosing in type 2 diabetes patients. This double-blind, multisite, parallel-group study randomized 63 patients (placebo, n = 18; 50 mg, n = 9; 150 mg, n = 18; 500 mg, n = 18) for 14-day treatment. The results showed no serious adverse effects or treatment-related hypoglycemia. One patient (150-mg group) showed mild-to-moderate transaminitis at the end of dosing. Median MK-8666 Tmax was 2.0-2.5 h and mean apparent terminal half-life was 22-32 h. On Day 15, MK-8666 reduced fasting plasma glucose by 54.1 mg/dL (500 mg), 36.0 mg/dL (150 mg), and 30.8 mg/dL (50 mg) more than placebo, consistent with translational pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic model predictions. Maximal efficacy for longer-term assessment is projected at 500 mg based on exposure-response analysis. In conclusion, MK-8666 was generally well tolerated with robust glucose-lowering efficacy.

The incidence of hypoglycaemia in Muslim patients with type 2 diabetes treated with sitagliptin or a sulphonylurea during Ramadan: a randomised trial.

AIMS: To compare the incidence of symptomatic hypoglycaemia in fasting Muslim patients with type 2 diabetes treated with sitagliptin or a sulphonylurea during Ramadan. METHODS: Patients with type 2 diabetes (age ≥ 18 years) who were treated with a stable dose of a sulphonylurea with or without metformin for at least 3 months prior to screening, who had an HbA(1c) < 10% and who expressed their intention to daytime fast during Ramadan were eligible for this open-label study. Patients were randomised in a 1 : 1 ratio to either switch to sitagliptin 100 mg qd or to remain on their prestudy sulphonylurea. Patients completed daily diary cards to document information on hypoglycaemic symptoms and complications. The primary end-point was the overall incidence of symptomatic hypoglycaemia recorded during Ramadan. RESULTS: Of the 1066 patients randomised, 1021 (n = 507 for sitagliptin and n = 514 for sulphonylurea) returned at least one completed diary card and were included in the analysis. The proportion of patients who recorded one or more symptomatic hypoglycaemic events during Ramadan was lower in the sitagliptin group (6.7%) compared with the sulphonylurea group (13.2%). The risk of symptomatic hypoglycaemia was significantly decreased with sitagliptin relative to sulphonylurea treatment (Mantel-Haenszel relative risk ratio [95% CI] = 0.51 [0.34, 0.75]; p < 0.001). There were no reported events that required medical assistance (i.e. visits to physician or emergency room or hospitalisations) or were considered severe (i.e. events that caused loss of consciousness, seizure, coma or physical injury) during Ramadan. CONCLUSIONS: In Muslim patients with type 2 diabetes who observed the fast during Ramadan, switching to a sitagliptin-based regimen decreased the risk of hypoglycaemia compared with remaining on a sulphonylurea-based regimen. The incidence of hypoglycaemia was lower with gliclazide relative to the other sulphonylurea agents and similar to that observed with sitagliptin.

The Biomarkers Consortium: practice and pitfalls of open-source precompetitive collaboration.

Precompetitive collaboration is a growing driver for innovation and increased productivity in biomedical science and drug development. The Biomarkers Consortium, a public-private platform for precompetitive collaboration specific to biomarkers, demonstrated that adiponectin has potential utility as a predictor of metabolic responses to peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPAR) agonists in individuals with type 2 diabetes. Despite the challenges overcome by this project, the most important lesson learned is that cross-company precompetitive collaboration is a feasible robust approach to biomarker qualification.

Utility of adiponectin as a biomarker predictive of glycemic efficacy is demonstrated by collaborative pooling of data from clinical trials conducted by multiple sponsors.

This study, conducted under the Metabolic Disorders Steering Committee of the Biomarkers Consortium (a public-private partnership managed by the Foundation for the National Institutes of Health (FNIH)), analyzed blinded data on 2,688 type 2 diabetes (T2D) patients from randomized clinical trials conducted by four pharmaceutical companies. An increase in the levels of adiponectin was observed after peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPAR)-agonist treatment (P < 0.0001), but not after treatment with non-PPAR drugs. This increase correlated with decreases in levels of glucose, hemoglobin A(1c) (Hb(A1c)), hematocrit, and triglycerides, and increases in levels of blood urea nitrogen, creatinine, and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C). Early (6-8 weeks) increases in levels of adiponectin after treatment with PPAR agonists showed a negative correlation (r = -0.21, P < 0.0001) with subsequent changes in levels of Hb(A1c). Changes in adiponectin level did not appear to be associated with baseline level of Hb(A1c). Logistic regression demonstrated that an increase in the level of adiponectin predicts a decrease in the level of Hb(A1c). These analyses confirm previously demonstrated relationships between adiponectin levels and metabolic parameters and support the robust predictive utility of adiponectin across the spectrum of glucose tolerance. Cross-company precompetitive collaboration is a feasible and powerful approach to biomarker qualification.