Development and Single Laboratory Evaluation of a Refined and specific Real-time PCR Detection Method, Using Mitochondrial Primers (Mit1C), for the Detection of Cyclospora cayetanensis in Produce.

Regulatory methods for detection of the foodborne protozoan parasite Cyclospora cayetanensis must be specific and sensitive. To that end, we designed and evaluated (in a single laboratory validation) a novel and improved primer/probe combination (Mit1C) for real-time PCR detection of C. cayetanensis in produce. The newly developed primer/probe combination targets a conserved region of the mitochondrial genome of C. cayetanensis that varies in other closely related organisms. The primer/probe combination was evaluated both in silico and using several real-time PCR kits and polymerases against an inclusivity/exclusivity panel comprised of a variety of C. cayetanensis oocysts, as well as DNA from other related Cyclospora spp. and closely related parasites. The new primer/probe combination amplified only C. cayetanensis, thus demonstrating specificity. Sensitivity was evaluated by artificially contaminating cilantro, raspberries, and romaine lettuce with variable numbers (200 and 5) of C. cayetanensis oocysts. As few as 5 oocysts were detected in 75%, 67.7%, and 50% of the spiked produce samples (cilantro, raspberries, and romaine lettuce), respectively, all uninoculated samples and no-template real-time PCR controls were negative. The improved primer/probe combination should prove an effective analytical tool for the specific detection of C. cayetanensis in produce.

Multi-Laboratory Study of Five Methods for the Determination of Brevetoxins in Shellfish Tissue Extracts.

A thirteen-laboratory comparative study tested the performance of four methods as alternatives to mouse bioassay for the determination of brevetoxins in shellfish. The methods were N2a neuroblastoma cell assay, two variations of the sodium channel receptor binding assay, competitive ELISA, and LC/MS. Three to five laboratories independently performed each method using centrally prepared spiked and naturally incurred test samples. Competitive ELISA and receptor binding (96-well format) compared most favorably with mouse bioassay. Between-laboratory relative standard deviations (RSDR) ranged from 10 to 20% for ELISA and 14 to 31% for receptor binding. Within-laboratory (RSDr) ranged from 6 to 15% for ELISA, and 5 to 31% for receptor binding. Cell assay was extremely sensitive but data variation rendered it unsuitable for statistical treatment. LC/MS performed as well as ELISA on spiked test samples but was inordinately affected by lack of toxin-metabolite standards, uniform instrumental parameters, or both, on incurred test samples. The ELISA and receptor binding assay are good alternatives to mouse bioassay for the determination of brevetoxins in shellfish.