Autoantibodies in idiopathic inflammatory myopathies: Clinical associations and laboratory evaluation by mono- and multispecific immunoassays.

Idiopathic inflammatory myopathies (IIM) are a group of diseases characterized by immune-mediated muscular lesions that may be associated with extra-muscular manifestations involving skin, lungs, heart or joints. Four main groups of IIM can be distinguished: dermatomyositis (DM), overlap myositis including mainly anti-synthetase syndrome (ASS), immune mediated necrotizing myopathy (IMNM), and inclusion body myositis (IBM). Myositis-specific autoantibodies (MSA) are increasingly recognized as valuable tools for diagnosis, classification and prognosis of IIM. For example, ASS is associated with anti-aminoacyl tRNA synthetase antibodies (anti-Jo-1, PL-7, PL-12, …), IMNM with anti-SRP and anti-HMGCR; IBM with anti-cytosolic 5'nucleotidase 1A (cN1A), and DM with anti-Mi-2, anti-MDA-5, anti-TIF-1γ, anti-NXP-2 and anti-SAE. Moreover, anti-MDA-5 is associated with amyopathic myositis and interstitial lung disease and anti-TIF-1γ and anti-NXP-2 with juvenile DM as well as malignancy in patients >40 years. Most MSA have initially been discovered by immunoprecipitation. In routine laboratories, however, MSA are screened for by indirect immunofluorescence and identified by (automated) monospecific immunoassays or by multispecific immunoassays (mainly line/dot immunoassays). Validation of these (multispecific) assays is a challenge as the antibodies are rare and the assays diverse. In this review, we give an overview of the (clinical) performance characteristics of monospecific assays as well as of multispecific assays for detection of MSA. Although most assays are clinically useful, there are differences between techniques and between manufacturers. We discuss that efforts are needed to harmonize and standardize detection of MSA.

International recommendations for the assessment of autoantibodies to cellular antigens referred to as anti-nuclear antibodies.

Anti-nuclear antibodies (ANA) are fundamental for the diagnosis of autoimmune diseases, and have been determined by indirect immunofluorescence assay (IIFA) for decades. As the demand for ANA testing increased, alternative techniques were developed challenging the classic IIFA. These alternative platforms differ in their antigen profiles, sensitivity and specificity, raising uncertainties regarding standardisation and interpretation of incongruent results. Therefore, an international group of experts has created recommendations for ANA testing by different methods. Two groups of experts participated in this initiative. The European autoimmunity standardization initiative representing 15 European countries and the International Union of Immunologic Societies/World Health Organization/Arthritis Foundation/Centers for Disease Control and Prevention autoantibody standardising committee. A three-step process followed by a Delphi exercise with closed voting was applied. Twenty-five recommendations for determining ANA (1-13), anti-double stranded DNA antibodies (14-18), specific antibodies (19-23) and validation of methods (24-25) were created. Significant differences between experts were observed regarding recommendations 24-25 (p<0.03). Here, we formulated recommendations for the assessment and interpretation of ANA and associated antibodies. Notably, the roles of IIFA as a reference method, and the importance of defining nuclear and cytoplasmic staining, were emphasised, while the need to incorporate alternative automated methods was acknowledged. Various approaches to overcome discrepancies between methods were suggested of which an improved bench-to-bedside communication is of the utmost importance. These recommendations are based on current knowledge and can enable harmonisation of local algorithms for testing and evaluation of ANA and related autoantibodies. Last but not least, new more appropriate terminologies have been suggested.

Sensory chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy: an under-recognized entity?

INTRODUCTION: Sensory chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (CIDP) can be difficult to diagnose. METHODS: We report 22 patients with chronic sensory polyneuropathy with ≥1 clinical sign atypical for chronic idiopathic axonal polyneuropathy (CIAP) but no electrodiagnostic criteria for CIDP. RESULTS: Clinical signs atypical for CIAP were: sensory ataxia (59%), generalized areflexia (36%), cranial nerve involvement (32%), rapid upper limb involvement (40%), and age at onset ≤55 years (50%). Additional features were: normal sensory nerve action potentials (36%), abnormal radial/normal sural pattern (23%), abnormal somatosensory evoked potentials (SSEPs) (100%), elevated cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) protein (73%), and demyelinating features in 5/7 nerve biopsies. Over 90% of patients responded to immunotherapy. We conclude that all patients had sensory CIDP. CONCLUSIONS: Sensory CIDP patients can be misdiagnosed as having CIAP. If atypical clinical/electrophysiologic features are present, we recommend performing SSEPs and CSF examination. Nerve biopsy should be restricted to disabled patients if other examinations are inconclusive.

Effect of cryoglobulin and crystalcryoglobulin on TNF-alpha production by normal human monocytes.

OBJECTIVES: We recovered an IgG1-kappa cryocrystalglobulin in synovial fluid and membrane specimens from a patient with destructive arthropathy. In the present study, we investigated its proinflammatory properties by measuring its effects on TNF-alpha production by normal human monocytes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Normal human monocytes isolated by plastic adhesion were cultured in microtiter plates. Adherent monocytes were cultured for 6, 8, and 24 hours with sterile cryocrystalglobulin (150 microg/mL and 2 mg/mL), type I noncrystallised cryoglobulin (same concentrations), monosodium urate (MSU) crystals (2 mg/mL), LPS (10 microg/mL), or medium alone. Supernatant TNF-a concentrations were assayed using an ELISA. RESULTS: Cryocrystalglobulin had no effect on TNF-alpha production by normal human monocytes. Noncrystallised cryoglobulin increased TNF-alpha levels in supernatants in a time-dependent and concentration-dependent fashion. This increase was significantly less marked than the increases achieved with MSU crystals or LPS. CONCLUSION: IgG1kappa cryocrystalglobulin has no effect on TNF-alpha production by normal human monocytes. Fc region changes within the cryocrystalglobulin molecule may explain this finding.