How liquid biopsies can change clinical practice in oncology.

Cell-free DNA fragments are shed into the bloodstream by tumor cells. The analysis of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA), commonly known as liquid biopsy, can be exploited for a variety of clinical applications. ctDNA is being used to genotype solid cancers non-invasively, to track tumor dynamics and to detect the emergence of drug resistance. In a few settings, liquid biopsies have already entered clinical practice. For example, ctDNA is used to guide treatment in a subset of lung cancers. In this review, we discuss how recent improvements in the sensitivity and accuracy of ctDNA analyses have led to unprecedented advances in this research field. We further consider what is required for the routine deployment of liquid biopsies in the clinical diagnostic space. We pinpoint technical hurdles that liquid biopsies have yet to overcome, including preanalytical and analytical challenges. We foresee how liquid biopsies will transform clinical practice: by complementing (or replacing) imaging to monitor treatment response and by detecting minimal residual disease after surgery with curative intent.

Tracking a CAD-ALK gene rearrangement in urine and blood of a colorectal cancer patient treated with an ALK inhibitor.

BACKGROUND: Monitoring response and resistance to kinase inhibitors is essential to precision cancer medicine, and is usually investigated by molecular profiling of a tissue biopsy obtained at progression. However, tumor heterogeneity and tissue sampling bias limit the effectiveness of this strategy. In addition, tissue biopsies are not always feasible and are associated with risks due to the invasiveness of the procedure. To overcome these limitations, blood-based liquid biopsy analysis has proven effective to non-invasively follow tumor clonal evolution. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We exploited urine cell-free, trans-renal DNA (tr-DNA) and matched plasma circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) to monitor a metastatic colorectal cancer patient carrying a CAD-ALK translocation during treatment with an ALK inhibitor. RESULTS: Using a custom next generation sequencing panel we identified the genomic CAD-ALK rearrangement and a TP53 mutation in plasma ctDNA. Sensitive assays were developed to detect both alterations in urine tr-DNA. The dynamics of the CAD-ALK rearrangement in plasma and urine were concordant and paralleled the patient's clinical course. Detection of the CAD-ALK gene fusion in urine tr-DNA anticipated radiological confirmation of disease progression. Analysis of plasma ctDNA identified ALK kinase mutations that emerged during treatment with the ALK inhibitor entrectinib. CONCLUSION: We find that urine-based genetic testing allows tracing of tumor-specific oncogenic rearrangements. This strategy could be effectively applied to non-invasively monitor tumor evolution during therapy. The same approach could be exploited to monitor minimal residual disease after surgery with curative intent in patients whose tumors carry gene fusions. The latter could be implemented without the need of patient hospitalization since urine tr-DNA can be self-collected, is stable over time and can be shipped at specified time-points to central labs for testing.