Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 6 de 6
Filter
1.
Am J Cardiol ; 126: 16-22, 2020 07 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32345472

ABSTRACT

Identifying coronary artery disease (CAD) in atrial fibrillation (AF) patients improves risk stratification and defines clinical management. However, the value of screening for subclinical CAD with cardiac CT in AF patients is unknown. Between 2011 and 2015, 94 consecutive patients without known or suspected CAD (66 (57-73) years, 68% male), who were referred for AF evaluation, underwent a noncontrast-enhanced coronary calcium scan and a coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) at our center. We retrospectively evaluated the coronary calcium score, the prevalence of obstructive CAD (≥50% stenosis) determined by CCTA, compared clinical management and 5-year outcome in patients with and without obstructive CAD on CCTA, and examined the potential impact of a coronary calcium score and obstructive CAD on CCTA as a manifestation of vascular disease on the CHA2Ds2VASc score and for the cardiovascular risk stratification of AF patients. The median coronary calcium score was 57 (0-275) and 24 patients (26%) had obstructive CAD on CCTA. At baseline, patients with obstructive CAD more often used statins than those without obstructive CAD (54% vs 26%, p = 0.011). After a median clinical follow-up of 2.4 (0.5-4.5) years, patients with obstructive CAD more frequently used oral anticoagulant and/or antiplatelet drugs, statins, angiotensin-II-receptor blockers and/or angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibitors, and less often used class I antiarrhythmic drugs than patients without obstructive CAD (all p <0.050). After a median follow-up of 5.7 (4.8-6.8) years, mortality was higher in patients with obstructive CAD than in those without obstructive CAD (29% vs 11%, log-rank test: p = 0.034). Implementation of a coronary calcium score and/or obstructive CAD on CCTA elevated the CHA2Ds2VASc score and cardiovascular risk stratification in 42 patients (p <0.001) and 47 patients (p = 0.006), respectively. In conclusion, we observed a high prevalence of obstructive CAD on CCTA in AF patients without known or suspected CAD. AF patients with obstructive CAD were managed differently and had a worse prognosis than those without obstructive CAD. Cardiac CT could enhance cardiovascular risk stratification of AF patients.


Subject(s)
Atrial Fibrillation/epidemiology , Computed Tomography Angiography , Coronary Angiography/methods , Coronary Artery Disease/mortality , Coronary Stenosis/mortality , Risk Assessment , Vascular Calcification/diagnostic imaging , Aged , Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists/therapeutic use , Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Anticoagulants/therapeutic use , Atrial Fibrillation/therapy , Coronary Artery Disease/diagnostic imaging , Coronary Artery Disease/therapy , Coronary Stenosis/diagnostic imaging , Coronary Stenosis/therapy , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Male , Middle Aged , Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Prognosis , Retrospective Studies , Vascular Calcification/mortality , Vascular Calcification/therapy
2.
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging ; 11(11): 1625-1636, 2018 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29248657

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: This study sought to assess the effectiveness, efficiency, and safety of a tiered, comprehensive cardiac computed tomography (CT) protocol in comparison with functional testing. BACKGROUND: Although CT angiography accurately rules out coronary artery disease (CAD), incorporation of CT myocardial perfusion imaging as part of a tiered diagnostic approach could improve the clinical value and efficiency of cardiac CT in the diagnostic work-up of patients with angina pectoris. METHODS: Between July 2013 and November 2015, 268 patients (mean age 58 years; 49% female) with stable angina (mean pre-test probability 54%) were prospectively randomized between cardiac CT and standard guideline-directed functional testing (95% exercise electrocardiography). The tiered cardiac CT protocol included a calcium scan, followed by CT angiography if calcium was detected. Patients with ≥50% stenosis on CT angiography underwent CT myocardial perfusion imaging. RESULTS: By 6 months, the primary endpoint, the rate of invasive coronary angiograms without a European Society of Cardiology class I indication for revascularization, was lower in the CT group than in the functional testing group (2 of 130 [1.5%] vs. 10 of 138 [7.2%]; p = 0.035), whereas the proportion of invasive angiograms with a revascularization indication was higher (88% vs. 50%; p = 0.017). The median duration until the final diagnosis was 0 (0 of 0) days in the CT group and 0 (0 of 17) in the functional testing group (p < 0.001). Overall, 13% of patients randomized to CT required further testing, compared with 37% in the functional testing group (p < 0.001). The adverse event rate was similar (3% vs. 3%; p = 1.000), although the median cumulative radiation dose was higher for the CT group (3.1 mSv [interquartile range: 1.6 to 7.8] vs. 0 mSv [interquartile range: 0.0 to 7.1]; p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with suspected stable CAD, a tiered cardiac CT protocol with dynamic perfusion imaging offers a fast and efficient alternative to functional testing. (Comprehensive Cardiac CT Versus Exercise Testing in Suspected Coronary Artery Disease 2 [CRESCENT2]; NCT02291484).


Subject(s)
Coronary Artery Disease/diagnostic imaging , Coronary Circulation , Coronary Stenosis/diagnostic imaging , Coronary Vessels/diagnostic imaging , Myocardial Perfusion Imaging/methods , Tomography, X-Ray Computed , Aged , Computed Tomography Angiography , Coronary Angiography , Coronary Artery Disease/physiopathology , Coronary Artery Disease/therapy , Coronary Stenosis/physiopathology , Coronary Stenosis/therapy , Coronary Vessels/physiopathology , Electrocardiography , Exercise Test , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Myocardial Revascularization , Netherlands , Predictive Value of Tests , Prognosis , Prospective Studies , Severity of Illness Index
3.
Circ Cardiovasc Imaging ; 10(2)2017 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28174196

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Cardiac computed tomography (CT) represents an alternative diagnostic strategy for women with suspected coronary artery disease, with potential benefits in terms of effectiveness and cost-efficiency. METHODS AND RESULTS: The CRESCENT trial (Calcium Imaging and Selective CT Angiography in Comparison to Functional Testing for Suspected Coronary Artery Disease) prospectively randomized 350 patients with stable angina (55% women; aged 55±10 years), mostly with an intermediate coronary artery disease probability, between cardiac CT and functional testing. The tiered cardiac CT protocol included a calcium scan followed by CT angiography if the Agatston calcium score was between 1 and 400. Patients with test-specific contraindications were not excluded from study participation. Sex differences were studied as a prespecified subanalysis. Enrolled women presented more frequently with atypical chest pain and had a lower pretest probability of coronary artery disease compared with men. Independently of these differences, cardiac CT led in both sexes to a fast final diagnosis when compared with functional testing, although the effect was larger in women (P interaction=0.01). The reduced need for further testing after CT, compared with functional testing, was most evident in women (P interaction=0.009). However, no sex interaction was observed with respect to changes in angina and quality of life, cumulative diagnostic costs, and applied radiation dose (all P interactions≥0.097). CONCLUSIONS: Cardiac CT is more efficient in women than in men in terms of time to reach the final diagnosis and downstream testing. However, overall clinical outcome showed no significant difference between women and men after 1 year. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT01393028.


Subject(s)
Angina, Stable/etiology , Computed Tomography Angiography/statistics & numerical data , Coronary Angiography/statistics & numerical data , Coronary Artery Disease/diagnostic imaging , Coronary Vessels/diagnostic imaging , Healthcare Disparities , Vascular Calcification/diagnostic imaging , Aged , Coronary Angiography/methods , Coronary Artery Disease/complications , Disease-Free Survival , Female , Humans , Kaplan-Meier Estimate , Male , Middle Aged , Netherlands , Predictive Value of Tests , Prospective Studies , Radiation Dosage , Radiation Exposure , Reproducibility of Results , Severity of Illness Index , Sex Factors , Time Factors , Vascular Calcification/complications
4.
Eur Heart J ; 37(15): 1232-43, 2016 Apr 14.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26746631

ABSTRACT

AIMS: To compare the effectiveness and safety of a cardiac computed tomography (CT) algorithm with functional testing in patients with symptoms suggestive of coronary artery disease (CAD). METHODS AND RESULTS: Between April 2011 and July 2013, 350 patients with stable angina, referred to the outpatient clinic of four Dutch hospitals, were prospectively randomized between cardiac CT and functional testing (2 : 1 ratio). The tiered cardiac CT protocol included a calcium scan followed by CT angiography if the Agatston calcium score was between 1 and 400. Patients with test-specific contraindications were not excluded from study participation. By 1 year, fewer patients randomized to cardiac CT reported anginal complaints (P = 0.012). The cumulative radiation dose was slightly higher in the CT group (6.6 ± 8.7 vs. 6.1 ± 9.3 mSv; P < 0.0001). After 1.2 years, event-free survival was 96.7% for patients randomized to CT and 89.8% for patients randomized to functional testing (P = 0.011). After CT, the final diagnosis was established sooner (P < 0.0001), and additional downstream testing was required less frequently (25 vs. 53%, P < 0.0001), resulting in lower cumulative diagnostic costs (€369 vs. €440; P < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: For patients with suspected stable CAD, a tiered cardiac CT protocol offers an effective and safe alternative to functional testing. Incorporating the calcium scan into the diagnostic workup was safe and lowered diagnostic expenses and radiation exposure.


Subject(s)
Coronary Artery Disease/diagnostic imaging , Vascular Calcification/diagnostic imaging , Computed Tomography Angiography/methods , Coronary Artery Disease/physiopathology , Coronary Artery Disease/therapy , Electrocardiography , Exercise Test/methods , Female , Humans , Kaplan-Meier Estimate , Male , Middle Aged , Myocardial Revascularization/statistics & numerical data , Radiation Dosage , Risk Factors , Surveys and Questionnaires , Treatment Outcome , Vascular Calcification/physiopathology , Vascular Calcification/therapy
5.
Acta Cardiol ; 68(6): 559-67, 2013 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24579433

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Ablation of atrioventricular nodal re-entrant tachycardia (AVNRT) is a highly effective procedure both with radiofrequency (RF) and cryoenergy (CE). Conventionally, it requires several diagnostic catheters and hospital admission. This study assessed the safety and efficacy of a highly simplified approach using the magnetic navigation system (MNS) compared to CE and manual RF ablation (MAN). METHODS AND RESULTS: In the MNS group a single magnetic-guided quadripolar catheter was inserted through the internal jugular vein to perform ablation. In the CE group cryomapping preceded ablation and for MAN procedures conventional ablation was performed. The following parameters were analysed: success- and recurrence rate, procedure-, fluoroscopy- and total application time. In total 69 eligible patients were treated with MNS (n = 26), CE (n = 25) and MAN (n = 16). The success rates were 100%, 100% and 94%, respectively (p = ns). The mean procedural time was 83 +/- 25 min for MNS, 117 +/- 47 min for CE and 117 +/- 55 min for MAN (P < 0.01). Total radiation time was significantly lower for MNS [0.0 min (IQR 0.0-0.0)] compared to CE [15.1 min (IQR 9.1-23.8), P < 0.001] and MAN [17.5 min (IQR 7.0-31.3), P < 0.001]. The total application time was comparable for both RF groups: 357 +/- 315 s (MNS) vs 204 +/- 177 s (MAN) (P = 0.14). No major adverse events occurred. After 3 months follow-up similar PR intervals were recorded for all patients. During a follow-up of 26 +/- 5 months recurrence rates were 3.8%, 4.0% and 6.3%, respectively, for each group. CONCLUSIONS: The MNS-guided single-catheter approach is a feasible and safe technique for the treatment of patients with typical AVNRT.


Subject(s)
Catheter Ablation/instrumentation , Magnetics/instrumentation , Magnets , Tachycardia, Atrioventricular Nodal Reentry/surgery , Electrocardiography , Feasibility Studies , Female , Fluoroscopy/methods , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Prospective Studies , Tachycardia, Atrioventricular Nodal Reentry/physiopathology , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome
6.
Am J Cardiol ; 104(11): 1499-504, 2009 Dec 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19932782

ABSTRACT

The aim of this study was to investigate the value of coronary calcium detection by computed tomography compared to computed tomographic angiography (CTA) and exercise testing to detect obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD) in patients with stable chest pain. A total of 471 consecutive patients with new stable chest complaints were scheduled to undergo dual-source multislice computed tomography (Siemens, Germany; coronary calcium score [CCS] and coronary CTA) and exercise electrocardiography (XECG). Clinically driven invasive quantitative angiography was performed in 98 patients. Only 3 of 175 patients (2%) with a negative CCS had significant CAD on CT angiogram, with only 1 confirmed by quantitative angiography. In patients with a high calcium score (Agatston score >400), CTA could exclude significant CAD in no more than 4 of 65 patients (6%). In patients with a low-intermediate CCS, CTA more often yielded diagnostic results compared to XECG and could rule out obstructive CAD in 56% of patients. For patients with CAD on CT angiogram, those with abnormal exercise electrocardiographic results more often showed severe CAD (p <0.034). In patients with diagnostic results for all tests, the sensitivity and specificity to detect >50% quantitative angiographic diameter stenosis were 100% and 15% for CCS >0, 82% and 64% for CCS >100, 97% and 36% for CTA, and 70% and 76% for XECG, respectively. In conclusion, nonenhanced computed tomography for calcium detection is a reliable means to exclude obstructive CAD in stable, symptomatic patients. Contrast-enhanced CTA can exclude significant CAD in patients with a low-intermediate CCS but is of limited value in patients with a high CCS.


Subject(s)
Calcinosis/diagnostic imaging , Chest Pain/diagnostic imaging , Coronary Angiography/methods , Coronary Artery Disease/diagnostic imaging , Exercise Test , Tomography, X-Ray Computed , Adult , Aged , Calcinosis/complications , Calcinosis/diagnosis , Chest Pain/diagnosis , Chest Pain/etiology , Coronary Artery Disease/complications , Coronary Artery Disease/diagnosis , Electrocardiography , Female , Humans , Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted , Male , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies , Risk Assessment , Sensitivity and Specificity , Severity of Illness Index
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...