Requirements of propofol at different end-points without adjuvant and during two different steady infusions of remifentanil.

BACKGROUND: Some reports show no interaction between propofol and opioids, whereas others state such interactions. We evaluated the influence of remifentanil on propofol requirements at certain anesthesia end-points. METHODS: Elective surgical patients were randomly assigned to three groups of 15 patients each. Premedication was with oral diazepam 0.1 mg kg(-1). Patients were blindly given equal volumes of saline or remifentanil (7.5 or 30 microg kg(-1). h(-1)) 1 min before induction of anesthesia with infusion of propofol, 30 mg kg(-1). h(-1). We recorded times to, propofol requirements, and bispectral index at loss of counting (LC), loss of verbal command (LVC), loss of reaction to tetanic stimulation (LRT), and onset of burst suppression pattern (BSP) of electroencephalography. RESULTS: In the remifentanil groups end-points were attained significantly faster and with lower doses of propofol than in the saline group. BIS-values were significantly different at LRT and BSP end-points. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that remifentanil infusion started before induction of propofol anesthesia significantly reduces propofol requirements at all end-points. The results suggest that remifentanil accelerates the hypnotic onset of propofol.

Potency of propofol, thiopentone and ketamine at various endpoints in New Zealand White rabbits.

Effective plasma concentrations of propofol, thiopentone and ketamine were determined at different endpoints in a study with randomized, crossover design in nine New Zealand White rabbits. A continuous infusion was used (30 ml/h) with concentrations of 10 mg/ml for propofol, 25 mg/ml for thiopentone and 20 mg/ml for ketamine. The endpoints were loss of the righting reflex, loss of purposeful reactions to tail clamping (as an example of a peripheral pain stimulus) or to intranostril insufflation of ammonia vapour (as an example of a central reflex stimulus), and the recovery of these reflexes and reactions. According to the ED50 values the potency ratios of propofol, thiopentone and ketamine were at the loss of righting reflex 1:1.8:1.2, at the loss of reaction to ammonia vapour 1:1.5:1.6, and at the loss of reaction to tail clamping 1:1.5:3.9, respectively. Recovery was significantly faster after propofol than after thiopentone and ketamine. Measuring the effective plasma concentrations of intravenous anaesthetics provides a method of relating dose to effect, but there still remains a variable gap between plasma concentration and effect.

Haemodynamic and plasma catecholamine responses during total intravenous anaesthesia for laryngomicroscopy. Thiopentone compared with propofol.

We compared the haemodynamic responses to endolaryngeal procedures during anaesthesia with propofol or thiopentone. Two minutes after administration of glycopyrronium 4 micrograms.kg-1 and alfentanil 17.5 micrograms.kg-1 anaesthesia was induced with either propofol 2.0 mg.kg-1 (n = 8) or thiopentone 5.0 mg.kg-1.min-1, respectively. Muscle relaxation was induced and maintained with suxamethonium. Intratracheal jet-ventilation (rate: 20 breath.min-1) was with 100% oxygen. Blood samples for later determination of plasma catecholamines were drawn and haemodynamic responses were recorded at tracheal intubation, after insertion of the operating laryngoscope, during the endolaryngeal procedure and after extubation. With both anaesthetic agents the only statistically significant haemodynamic response to intubation was a rise of heart rate. With propofol, plasma adrenaline concentrations decreased significantly after induction and remained below baseline values throughout the procedure. After insertion of the operating laryngoscope the haemodynamic response was more pronounced with thiopentone than with propofol. Propofol blocks the catecholamine and haemodynamic responses to endolaryngeal procedures more effectively than thiopentone.