Performance studies of Bifacial solar photovoltaic module installed at different orientations: Energy, Exergy, Enviroeconomic, and Exergo-Enviroeconomic analysis.

One method for exploiting albedo-based power generation is the bifacial solar module (BFSM). It includes information on the bifacial solar module's energy, electrical and exergy efficiency, thermal exergy, and environmental analysis. The study contrasted the outcomes of the BFSM's east/west and north/south orientations. BFSM has been applied on both orientations with equal to latitude and equal to 30 degrees. The outcomes of all the aforementioned cases were compared and analyzed after outdoor experiments for the climatic condition were carried out in Minjur, Tamil Nadu. Under the specific climatic conditions, the 13-degree east/west module offers a shorter energy payback period, a better energy production factor (EPF), and a higher life cycle conversion efficiency (LCCE) when the life time of the system is considered as 10, 15, and 20 years. The environmental and economic analyses show that the most carbon credits from 13 degrees were earned with Rs. 14,925 and Rs. 192.89 from east/west module when the system's life was taken into account.

Experimental investigation of 4E performance studies of a vertical bifacial solar module during summer and winter.

The proposed research work presents the performance analysis of the vertically mounted bifacial module (VBFM) with and without tracking during the summer and winter seasons. Also, various parameters like energy efficiency, electrical efficiency, electrical exergy, thermal exergy, exergy efficiency, environmental analysis, economic analysis, exergoeconomic analysis, enviroeconomic analysis, and exergoenviroeconomic analysis of the VBFM were studied and presented. The comparative analysis was carried out between two bifacial solar modules installed in two different orientations (east-west and south-north). The experiments were conducted in the real climatic condition of Minjur, Tamil Nadu, India. Under the summer and winter climatic conditions, when the lifetime period of 10, 15, and 20 years are considered higher energy production factor and higher life cycle conversion efficiency was obtained from the vertically mounted bifacial module-east-west (VBFM-EW) with tracking during summer and vertically mounted bifacial module-north-south (VBFM-SN) module without tracking during the winter season. Exergetic cost was calculated by considering 15, 20, 25, and 30 years of the system with 2%, 5%, and 10% interest rates. The maximum exergetic cost was obtained from 30 years of the system under a 2% interest rate. The enviroeconomic and exergoenviroeconomic analysis provides the carbon credits earned from the E-W module was a maximum of Rs 11,036.18 during the summer season and Rs 12,413.48 from the VBFM-SN module during the winter season, considering the life of the system as 15 years.

Experimental investigation of an active inclined solar panel absorber solar still-energy and exergy analysis.

The objective of the current study is to investigate the performance of the inclined solar panel basin still (ISPBS) incorporated with a spiral tube collector (STC) for various mass flow rates of water (mf). The maximum potable water yield of 8.1, 6.9, and 6.1 kg is obtained for different mass flow rates of 1.8, 3.2, and 4.7 kg/h in each instance. Also, for mf of 1.8, 3.2, and 4.7 kg per hour, the daily average energy and exergy efficiency of the ISPBS is recorded to be 47.9, 39.3, and 31.02 % and 9.8, 7.9, and 5.6 %, in each instance. The average electrical, thermal, and exergy efficiency of the PV panel is noted to be 6.5, 7.1, and 7.5 %; 15.67, 17.1, and 18.04 %; and 20.03, 22.21, and 23.36 % for mf of 1.8, 3.2, and 4.7 kg/h in each instance. The rise in mf causes a drop in the fresh water production yield; thermal, exergy, and overall thermal effectiveness; and an enhancement in the power production of the panel, electrical, thermal, exergy, and overall exergy efficiency of the system. Also, the cost of yield production is noted to be low-cost in AISS at minimum mf of 1.8 kg per hour (0.019 $/l) when compared to the other two mf of 3.2 and 4.7 kg per hour (0.022 and 0.025 $/l).

Energy and exergy analysis of conventional acrylic solar still with and without copper fins.

A detailed exergy analysis of a conventional and copper finned acrylic solar still has been presented in this manuscript. The evaporative, convective, and radiative heat transfer coefficient of water-glass has been calculated. Also energy efficiency, exergy destruction of basin, water, and glass has been determined. Conventional acrylic solar still with fins produced maximum hourly output of 1.24 kg and it produced daily output of 5.08 kg. The conventional acrylic solar still without fins produced maximum hourly output of 0.94 kg and it produced daily output of 3.75 kg. The maximum exergy destruction of the basin, water, and glass for the conventional acrylic solar still with fins are 655.206, 83.35, and 90.48 W/m2, respectively, and conventional acrylic solar still without fins are 616.28, 122.34, and 48.64 W/m2, respectively. The energy and exergy effectiveness of the conventional acrylic solar still with fins are 32 and 2.81%, respectively, and without fins are 24.93 and 1.69%, respectively. The study reveals that exergy destruction of water in the case of still with fins is minimum as related to the exergy destruction of water in the case of still without fins.