Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 5 de 5
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Rev Med Virol ; 34(3): e2537, 2024 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38666757

ABSTRACT

Human papillomavirus (HPV) infection is one of the most common sexually transmitted infections worldwide. It is caused by the HPV, a DNA virus that infects epithelial cells in various mucous membranes and skin surfaces. HPV can be categorised into high-risk and low-risk types based on their association with the development of certain cancers. High-risk HPV types, such as HPV-16 and HPV-18, are known to be oncogenic and are strongly associated with the development of cervical, anal, vaginal, vulvar, penile, and oropharyngeal cancers. These types of HPV can persist in the body for an extended period and, in some cases, lead to the formation of precancerous lesions that may progress to cancer if left untreated. Low-risk HPV types, such as HPV-6 and HPV-11, are not typically associated with cancer but can cause benign conditions like genital warts. Genital warts are characterised by the growth of small, cauliflower-like bumps on the genital and anal areas. Although not life-threatening, they can cause discomfort and psychological distress. HPV is primarily transmitted through sexual contact, including vaginal, anal, and oral sex. It can also be transmitted through non-penetrative sexual activities that involve skin-to-skin contact. In addition to sexual transmission, vertical transmission from mother to child during childbirth is possible but relatively rare. Prevention of HPV infection includes vaccination and safe sexual practices. HPV vaccines, such as Gardasil and Cervarix, are highly effective in preventing infection with the most common high-risk HPV types. These vaccines are typically administered to adolescents and young adults before they become sexually active. Safe sexual practices, such as consistent and correct condom use and limiting the number of sexual partners, can also reduce the risk of HPV transmission. Diagnosis of HPV infection can be challenging because the infection is often asymptomatic, especially in men. In women, HPV testing can be done through cervical screening programs, which involve the collection of cervical cells for analysis. Abnormal results may lead to further diagnostic procedures, such as colposcopy or biopsy, to detect precancerous or cancerous changes. Overall, HPV infection is a prevalent sexually transmitted infection with significant implications for public health. Vaccination, regular screening, and early treatment of precancerous lesions are key strategies to reduce the burden of HPV-related diseases and their associated complications. Education and awareness about HPV and its prevention are crucial in promoting optimal sexual health. This study aimed to carry out a literature review considering several aspects involving HPV infection: Global distribution, prevalence, biology, host interactions, cancer development, prevention, therapeutics, coinfection with other viruses, coinfection with bacteria, association with head and neck squamous cell carcinomas, and association with anal cancer.


Subject(s)
Neoplasms , Papillomavirus Infections , Humans , Papillomavirus Infections/epidemiology , Papillomavirus Infections/virology , Papillomavirus Infections/prevention & control , Papillomavirus Infections/transmission , Neoplasms/virology , Neoplasms/epidemiology , Neoplasms/prevention & control , Papillomaviridae/physiology , Papillomaviridae/genetics , Papillomaviridae/pathogenicity , Papillomavirus Vaccines/administration & dosage , Papillomavirus Vaccines/immunology , Host Microbial Interactions , Female , Male
2.
Arch Virol ; 168(8): 202, 2023 Jul 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37410187

ABSTRACT

Dengue is a viral disease transmitted by mosquitoes that has spread rapidly across all continents in recent years. There are four distinct but closely related serotypes of the virus that causes dengue (DENV-1, DENV-2, DENV-3, and DENV-4). In the present study, we evaluated temporal spreading and molecular evolution of dengue virus (DENV) serotypes. Bayesian coalescent analysis was performed to study viral evolution, and it was estimated that the most recent common ancestor of DENV-1 was present in 1884 in Southeast Asia, that of DENV-2 was present in 1723 in Europe, that of DENV-3 was present in 1921 in Southeast Asia, and that of DENV-4 was present in 1876 in Southeast Asia. DENV appears to have originated in Spain in approximately 1682, and it was disseminated in Asia and Oceania in approximately 1847. After this period, the virus was introduced into North America in approximately 1890. In South America, it was first disseminated to Ecuador in approximately 1897 and then to Brazil in approximately 1910. Dengue has had a significant impact on global health worldwide, and the present study provides an overview of the molecular evolution of DENV serotypes.


Subject(s)
Dengue Virus , Dengue , Animals , Humans , Bayes Theorem , Brazil , Dengue Virus/genetics , Evolution, Molecular , Phylogeny
4.
BMC Musculoskelet Disord ; 23(1): 501, 2022 May 27.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35624507

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: To describe success and failure (S&F) after lumbar spine surgery in terms equally understandable across the entire health ecosystem. METHODS: Back and leg pain and disability were prospectively recorded before and up to 12 months after the procedure. Satisfaction was recorded using a Likert scale. Initially, patients were classified as satisfied or unsatisfied. Optimal satisfaction/unsatisfaction cutoff values for disability and pain were estimated with ROC curves. Satisfied and unsatisfied groups underwent a second subdivision into four subcategories: success (satisfied AND pain and disability concordant with cutoff values), incomplete success (satisfied AND pain and disability nonconformant with cutoff values), incomplete failure (unsatisfied AND pain and disability nonconformant with cutoff values), and failure (unsatisfied AND pain and disability concordant with cutoff values). RESULTS: A total of 486 consecutive patients were recruited from 2019-2021. The mean values of preoperative PROMs were ODI 42.2 (+ 16.4), NPRS back 6.6 (+ 2.6) and NPRS leg 6.2 points (+ 2.9). Of the total, 80.7% were classified as satisfied, and 19.3% were classified as unsatisfactory. The optimal disability and pain cutoff values for satisfaction/unsatisfaction (NPRS = 6, AND ODI = 27) defined a subdivision: 59.6% were classified as success, 20.4% as incomplete success, 7.1% as incomplete failure and 12.4% as failure. The descriptions of each group were translated to the following: success-all patients were satisfied and presented no or only mild to tolerable pain and no or borderline disability; incomplete success - all patients were satisfied despite levels of pain and/or disability worse than ideal for success; incomplete failure - all patients were not satisfied despite levels of pain and/or disability better than expected for failure; failure - all patients were unsatisfied and presented moderate to severe pain and disability. CONCLUSION: It is possible to report S&F after surgery for DDL with precise and meaningful operational definitions focused on the experience of the patient.


Subject(s)
Ecosystem , Personal Satisfaction , Disability Evaluation , Humans , Pain , Pain Measurement/methods , Prospective Studies
5.
J Public Health Policy ; 42(3): 359-372, 2021 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34341478

ABSTRACT

We conducted a cross-sectional study to assess how the top 3 highest circulation newspapers from 25 countries are comparing and presenting COVID-19 epidemiological data to their readers. Of 75 newspapers evaluated, 51(68%) presented at their websites at least one comparison of cases and/or deaths between regions of their country and/or between countries. Quality assessment of the comparisons showed that only a minority of newspapers adjusted the data for population size in case comparisons between regions (37.2%) and between countries (25.6%), and the same was true for death comparisons between regions (27.3%) and between countries (27%). Of those making comparisons, only 13.7% explained the difference in the interpretation of cases and deaths. Of 17 that presented a logarithmic curve, only 29.4% explained its meaning. Although the press plays a key role in conveying correct medical information to the general public, we identified inconsistencies in the reporting of COVID-19 epidemiological data.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Global Health , Newspapers as Topic , COVID-19/epidemiology , Cross-Sectional Studies , Global Health/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Newspapers as Topic/standards , Newspapers as Topic/statistics & numerical data
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...