ABSTRACT
The resonance quality factor Q is a key parameter that describes the performance of magnetoelastic sensors. Its value can be easily quantified from the width and the peak position of the resonance curve but, when the resonance signals are small, for instance when a lot of damping is present (low quality factor), this and other simple methods to determine this parameter are highly inaccurate. In these cases, numerical fittings of the resonance curves allow to accurately obtain the value of the quality factor. We present a study of the use of different expressions to numerically fit the resonance curves of a magnetoelastic sensor that is designed to monitor the precipitation reaction of calcium oxalate. The study compares the performance of both fittings and the equivalence of the parameters obtained in each of them. Through these numerical fittings, the evolution of the different parameters that define the resonance curve of these sensors is studied, and their accuracy in determining the quality factor is compared.
ABSTRACT
The main parameters of magnetoelastic resonators in the detection of chemical (i.e., salts, gases, etc.) or biological (i.e., bacteria, phages, etc.) agents are the sensitivity S (or external agent change magnitude per Hz change in the resonance frequency) and the quality factor Q of the resonance. We present an extensive study on the experimental determination of the Q factor in such magnetoelastic resonant platforms, using three different strategies: (a) analyzing the real and imaginary components of the susceptibility at resonance; (b) numerical fitting of the modulus of the susceptibility; (c) using an exact mathematical expression for the real part of the susceptibility. Q values obtained by the three methods are analyzed and discussed, aiming to establish the most adequate one to accurately determine the quality factor of the magnetoelastic resonance.
