Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Sex Transm Infect ; 84(4): 259-64, 2008 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18256107

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: In 2004, the Ministry of Health adopted revised protocols for the syndromic management of sexually transmitted infections (STI) that included routine HIV testing. A training programme for providers was developed on the revised protocols that featured interactive case studies and training videos. An objective of the first phase of the training programme was to test its effect on four measures of clinical practice: (1) routine HIV testing; (2) performance of physical examination; (3) risk-reduction counselling and (4) patient education. METHODS: Clinical practice in a district where providers were trained was compared with a district without training. The measures of clinical practice were reported by 185 patients of providers who had been trained and compared with reports by 124 patients at comparison clinics. RESULTS: Relative to patients at comparison clinics, a higher percentage of patients of trainees reported that the provider: (1) offered an HIV test (87% versus 29%; p<0.001); (2) conducted a physical examination (98% versus 64%; p<0.001); (3) helped them to make a plan to avoid future STI acquisition (95% versus 76%; p<0.001) and (4) provided patient-specific information about HIV risk (65% versus 32%; p<0.001). Among patients offered HIV testing, the percentage who accepted did not differ between groups (38% of 161 patients of trainees versus 50% of 36 comparison patients; p = 0.260). Overall, 33% of patients of trainees and 14% of comparison patients were tested (p<0.001). CONCLUSION: A multifaceted training programme was associated with higher rates of HIV testing, physical examination, risk-reduction counselling and better HIV risk education.


Subject(s)
HIV Infections/diagnosis , Sexually Transmitted Diseases/therapy , Adolescent , Adult , Botswana/epidemiology , Female , HIV Infections/epidemiology , Humans , Male , Patient Education as Topic , Patient Satisfaction , Quality of Health Care , Risk Assessment , Sexually Transmitted Diseases/epidemiology , Treatment Outcome
2.
JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr ; 15(2): 189-93, 1991.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-2051557

ABSTRACT

Urinary urea nitrogen (UUN) has been used as an estimate of total urinary nitrogen (TUN) when calculating nitrogen output for nitrogen balance (NB) studies. UUN is assumed to constitute 80 to 90% of the total nitrogen output; when estimating TUN from UUN, UUN values are multiplied by 1.25 to correct for non-urea nitrogen components. In order to evaluate the validity of estimating total urinary nitrogen output from measured UUN in a clinical setting, 491 UUN:TUN paired studies were performed on 24-hour urine collections in general surgical/trauma patients who had measured TUN outputs ranging from 0.04 to 54.0 g/d. Assessment of 315 NB studies was done to compare NB values of those calculated by using UUN as an estimate of TUN with those calculated from measured TUN. Patients in both studies were subdivided into four stress categories, using TUN/day as the index: less than 5 g, 5-10 g, 10-15 g, and greater than 15 g. On average, 80 to 90% of TUN is represented by the UUN. However, in our patient population the variability ranged from 12 to 112%. If these UUN values are used as estimates for TUN in calculating NB, variations of up to 12 g/d would result. Application of the correction factor of 1.25 is not consistent in correcting for nonurea nitrogen components in this clinical setting. The use of actual rather than estimated TUN may be a more accurate and appropriate method than UUN when calculating NB.


Subject(s)
Nitrogen/urine , Nutritional Status , Surgical Procedures, Operative , Urea/urine , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Nitrogen/metabolism
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...